If they were present, I'm sure you would be creative enough to find *other* so
called flaws. They aren't flaws in my opinion. They are *choices* that have been
made for whatever reason. You cant' expect to have everything. (I'm not talking
about the link here, as I haven't tested that)
If something is *good* and worth the price, I value it accordingly instead of
concentrating on things that could possibly be better. You have a rather sad
life if you can't help but doing the latter.........
Well, as far as I'm concerned GP2 IS the best. I have the impression that you
only settle for the *perfect*. Make that "perfect in *your* opinion". That is
not reasonable. Nothing will ever be perfect, so there's always something to
whine about. And whining is the last thing that will inspire the programmers to
improve a follow-up. Why don't you try to ballance positive and negative
comments?
People wouldn't even TRY to invent anything any more if they knew that the
slightest imperfection would be blown up to the size of an african elephant. We
need a POSITIVE approach.
(sigh)
Nothing is perfect. There's always *something* left to desire (luckily there
is). Be happy with what you get: definitely the most realistic simulation on the
market. And not even an expensive one.
Anyway. I just sent my reply because I think you have HAD your chance to
complain. We know it by now, you don't have to KEEP hammering it in. Put a
webpage together! Open your own forum alt.complaining.with.david.gary or
something....
Jo
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The most civilized civilizations are as close to barba-
rism as polished iron is to rust.
Rivarol
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=