rec.autos.simulators

Nascar2 computer

Phili

Nascar2 computer

by Phili » Wed, 11 Dec 1996 04:00:00

I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ machine.
What do you find works the best with nascar2?

T. Fraustei

Nascar2 computer

by T. Fraustei » Thu, 12 Dec 1996 04:00:00

200 Pentium, 32 mg ram, 4 mg Rendition 3D video card, 17 inch monitor.  At
least that's what I want!


B Morph

Nascar2 computer

by B Morph » Thu, 12 Dec 1996 04:00:00


A P133 with 32 meg ram and a Verite 3d board would make anybody happy.

Q.B.M.

Bill Osborn

Nascar2 computer

by Bill Osborn » Thu, 12 Dec 1996 04:00:00


> I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ machine.
> What do you find works the best with nascar2?

A cray
Wayne William

Nascar2 computer

by Wayne William » Thu, 12 Dec 1996 04:00:00

I just bought a computer specifically for NRO and N2.

It is a Pentium Pro 200mhz, 64 meg edo memory, Intel VX motherboard,
Intergraph Reactor,
Viewsonic 17PS (1600x1200) , 33.6 fax modem, 12x CD rom, 3.5gig HD, NE2000
network card.

Cost $3100 delivered.

I run N2 with all detail on and 12 cars ahead with 30fps. It looks totally
awesome!

My backup machine is a amd 133 with SoundBlaster 3D and 32meg. There is a
BIG
difference between the two.

Regards,
        ---Wayne.




> > I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ machine.
> > What do you find works the best with nascar2?

> A cray

Mike Schreine

Nascar2 computer

by Mike Schreine » Thu, 12 Dec 1996 04:00:00


> I just bought a computer specifically for NRO and N2.

> It is a Pentium Pro 200mhz, 64 meg edo memory, Intel VX motherboard,
> Intergraph Reactor,
> Viewsonic 17PS (1600x1200) , 33.6 fax modem, 12x CD rom, 3.5gig HD, NE2000
> network card.

> Cost $3100 delivered.

> I run N2 with all detail on and 12 cars ahead with 30fps. It looks totally
> awesome!

> My backup machine is a amd 133 with SoundBlaster 3D and 32meg. There is a
> BIG
> difference between the two.

> Regards,
>         ---Wayne.




> > > I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ machine.
> > > What do you find works the best with nascar2?

> > A cray

I am in the process of deciding on what buy for my next system, and am
waiting for the MMX Pentiums. How does your PPro do in other app's?

I am under the impression that that the MMX Pentiums will be better
suited for what I will it for as the PPro's are not supposed to be real
good with 16bit apps. Had any problems??
Mick in Tampa
--
 ______________________________________________________________________
|                               |                 |       ____  ___ ___|
| Mike Schreiner                |CNSRL ADMIN.     |  ---\    / /   /__ |
|http://pages.prodigy.com/CNSRL |                 |    --\  / /---/_   |
| "Mick" on Hawaii              |Earnhardt Rules!!|      -\/ /   /     |
| "Mick_S" on Ten               |                 |             /      |
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

DaMa

Nascar2 computer

by DaMa » Fri, 13 Dec 1996 04:00:00

Your freakin backup machine is better than mine. Must be nice.

DaMan

>I just bought a computer specifically for NRO and N2.

>It is a Pentium Pro 200mhz, 64 meg edo memory, Intel VX motherboard,
>Intergraph Reactor,
>Viewsonic 17PS (1600x1200) , 33.6 fax modem, 12x CD rom, 3.5gig HD, NE2000
>network card.

>Cost $3100 delivered.

>I run N2 with all detail on and 12 cars ahead with 30fps. It looks totally
>awesome!

>My backup machine is a amd 133 with SoundBlaster 3D and 32meg. There is a
>BIG
>difference between the two.

>Regards,
>        ---Wayne.




>> > I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ machine.
>> > What do you find works the best with nascar2?

>> A cray

Jeff Vince

Nascar2 computer

by Jeff Vince » Fri, 13 Dec 1996 04:00:00



>>I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ
>machine.    
>>What do you find works the best with nascar2?

>A P133 with 32 meg ram and a Verite 3d board would make anybody happy.

   I might up that to a P166 (to make *everybody* happy), but I'm
pretty happy with one month old PC with the same config as you
mentioned (not to say it may not get a CPU upgrade in a year or so,
but right now the 133 was a lot of HP for few $$$ ;).

PS - B. Morphin, sounds like a way cool setup you've got.  What part
of the country do you live in -- any chance you need a new friend to
stop by and play sometime?  :)


Pick one or more: Model Rockets (competition-NERCB) / PCs (even Atari!) /
Papyrus ICR-ICR2-NCR / Who needs a life when you have multiple non-lives?

Eric T. Busc

Nascar2 computer

by Eric T. Busc » Fri, 13 Dec 1996 04:00:00

Perhaps, but most games are 32-bit.  On the PPros, Win95 runs slower
than NT because it is a mix of 16-bit and 32-bit code.

--

Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative
Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/



Greg Cis

Nascar2 computer

by Greg Cis » Fri, 13 Dec 1996 04:00:00


Just one question. Have you actually tried this? Or are you relying on old
PPro hype.

> --

> Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
> The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative
> Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/



> > I am under the impression that that the MMX Pentiums will be better
> > suited for what I will it for as the PPro's are not supposed to be
> real
> > good with 16bit apps. Had any problems??

The *ONLY* reason MMX P5's *MIGHT* make a difference is because the chips have
a 64K internal cache. BTW, A poorly written P5 MMX application will stall in
a similar manner to the way the old PPro did with 16-bit apps. So there :-)
Wayne William

Nascar2 computer

by Wayne William » Fri, 13 Dec 1996 04:00:00

I would not have got this setup if not for Nascar and the
new NRO. Since there is going to be real competition I
think that demands a premium configuration.

I had to really push myself to spend the money but you can't
take it with you so what the heck.

Regards,
        ---Wayne.



> Your freakin backup machine is better than mine. Must be nice.

> DaMan

> >I just bought a computer specifically for NRO and N2.

> >It is a Pentium Pro 200mhz, 64 meg edo memory, Intel VX motherboard,
> >Intergraph Reactor,
> >Viewsonic 17PS (1600x1200) , 33.6 fax modem, 12x CD rom, 3.5gig HD,
NE2000
> >network card.

> >Cost $3100 delivered.

> >I run N2 with all detail on and 12 cars ahead with 30fps. It looks
totally
> >awesome!

> >My backup machine is a amd 133 with SoundBlaster 3D and 32meg. There is
a
> >BIG
> >difference between the two.

> >Regards,
> >        ---Wayne.




> >> > I need a new computer to run nascar2. I presently have a 66MHZ
machine.
> >> > What do you find works the best with nascar2?

> >> A cray

Eric T. Busc

Nascar2 computer

by Eric T. Busc » Fri, 13 Dec 1996 04:00:00



Yes I've seen a PPro duel boot to NT and 95, and it was slower in the
95 sessions.  There have been plenty of benchmarks done by computer
magazines that quantify what I saw.

there :-)

There's also a few other enhancements over the current Pentiums:
(Taken from Tom's Hardware and Performance Guide:
http://sysdoc.pair.com/cpu.html)

?doubling of the L1 caches, 16kB data and 16 kB instruction cache
?doubling of the Write Buffers, now 4 instead of 2
?new branch prediction unit, taken from the Pentium Pro
?implementation of a Return Stack, as known from the Cyrix/IBM 6x86
?increase of the Pipelines by one step
?improvement of the Parallel Processing Ability of the two pipelines
?ability to pair up two MMX instructions in one go, hence 2 SIMD
instructions can be processed with 16 byte data in one clock cycle

Early reports with normal (non-MMX) applications that the MMX CPU's are
about 20% faster than a Pentium Classic of the same clock speed.

--

Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative
Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/

Wayne William

Nascar2 computer

by Wayne William » Fri, 13 Dec 1996 04:00:00

Mick,

I have heard some good things and bad things about the MMX so I decided I
could
not wait. THe way I figure it the Pro should last me until end of next year
and
then I will get whatever the new standard is then.

This machine runs everything fast. It is the quickest computer I have ever
used.
It seems to make the most difference with NT as that is all 32bit but WIN95
has quite
a bit of 32bit in the OS and it really screams.

Regards,
        ---Wayne.

Greg Cis

Nascar2 computer

by Greg Cis » Fri, 13 Dec 1996 04:00:00


And that is why I would get one. Not for it's MMX capability :-)

> --

> Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
> The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative
> Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/

Eric T. Busc

Nascar2 computer

by Eric T. Busc » Fri, 13 Dec 1996 04:00:00

That's partially my point as well.  After you throw in the larger
improvement with MMX-enabled applications (24-bit color at 8-bit speeds
for example), it really looks to be a good upgrade: for not much more
money, it's quite a better CPU.  I can't understand why anyone would
buy a Pentium Classic right now.

--

Emory University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative
Nascar Setups Page: http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/




rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.