And now for the 1million dollar question...
<drum roll>
"How did the closest car resembling a 1967 Formula 1 acted on the track ?
Was it sliding much as the cars in 1967 ? If not, was it due to the
modifications made after on those cars?"
--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard/Nas-Frank>
-- NROS Nascar sanctioned Guide http://www.nros.com/
-- SimRacing Online http://www.simracing.com/
-- Official mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
-- May the Downforce be with you...
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
But the cars were good.. V12 BRM's and Ferraris.. wow.. sweet sound
James
> And now for the 1million dollar question...
> <drum roll>
> "How did the closest car resembling a 1967 Formula 1 acted on the track ?
> Was it sliding much as the cars in 1967 ? If not, was it due to the
> modifications made after on those cars?"
> --
> -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard/Nas-Frank>
> -- NROS Nascar sanctioned Guide http://www.nros.com/
> -- SimRacing Online http://www.simracing.com/
> -- Official mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
> -- May the Downforce be with you...
> "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
Isnt it like that with all F1?
.
Yes I have the tape of this :)
I saw many slides at Mexico (it's when I saw that the half-tyres are not
hard like in GPL but actually just normal tyres that can flex when a car
pass on them). But they always show a 3-4seconds portion, not a full race
with the camera zooming on 1 car for a full lap or so. That's why I wanted
to know about that race. Oh yes there's a nice drift of a car in N.D.I.S.
at the Ring and I guess it was exiting Ex M?hle (sp?). I drooled :)
--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard/Nas-Frank>
-- NROS Nascar sanctioned Guide http://www.nros.com/
-- SimRacing Online http://www.simracing.com/
-- Official mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
-- May the Downforce be with you...
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
In Holland that's is available. Canal+ via satalite disc offers 6
different channels, with in car views and the data channel. I love to
have it, but allas, no satalite disc allowed where I live. :-(
Remco
--
all opinions expressed while drunk, stoned and flying through clouds.
I'm not paranoid. That's just a rumour started by people out to get me.
I don't think the drivers were really trying too hard. They were doing 1:32 laps
and the V8 touring cars were down to 1:26. After all, some of the cars are
insured for over $1,000,000 US and the leading 3 or 4 drivers were in their
early 70's.
Also I assume the tyres are not going to be circa 1967. but modern replica's
that inherit some of the extra grip and stability of 32 years of science.
> And now for the 1million dollar question...
> <drum roll>
> "How did the closest car resembling a 1967 Formula 1 acted on the track ?
> Was it sliding much as the cars in 1967 ? If not, was it due to the
> modifications made after on those cars?"
> --
> -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard/Nas-Frank>
> -- NROS Nascar sanctioned Guide http://www.nros.com/
> -- SimRacing Online http://www.simracing.com/
> -- Official mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
> -- May the Downforce be with you...
> "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
> >I WISH they had allowed us to listen to the cars screaming down the
> straights
> >instead of the b***commentary spoiling it.
> .
> > And now for the 1million dollar question...
> > <drum roll>
> > "How did the closest car resembling a 1967 Formula 1 acted on the track ?
> > Was it sliding much as the cars in 1967 ? If not, was it due to the
> > modifications made after on those cars?"
> > --
> > -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard/Nas-Frank>
> > -- NROS Nascar sanctioned Guide http://www.nros.com/
> > -- SimRacing Online http://www.simracing.com/
> > -- Official mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
> > -- May the Downforce be with you...
> > "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
> > how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
The suspensions of these 1960s cars were designed around a hard compound on
a bias construction with a lot smaller footprint than current tyres.
--
Best regards,
Bruce.
======
The Stunned Mullet........seriously satirical stuff!
http://www2.tpg.com.au/users/brucek/mullet/index.htm
===============================================
>I don't think the drivers were really trying too hard. They were doing 1:32
laps
>and the V8 touring cars were down to 1:26. After all, some of the cars are
>insured for over $1,000,000 US and the leading 3 or 4 drivers were in their
>early 70's.
>Also I assume the tyres are not going to be circa 1967. but modern
replica's
>that inherit some of the extra grip and stability of 32 years of science.
>> > We just had the 2nd of 4 races televised in Australia with the 1966 to
>> 1969
>> > F1 cars. One of the Lotus 49B's boiled on the line then stripped 3rd
gear
>> > taking off. The other (Pete Lovely driving) led for most of the race,
then
>> > the Ferrari 312/69 passed a few laps from the end. Finally finishing
0.01s
>> > infront of the Lotus.
>> > There were also a couple of BRM's, a Lotus 32, a McLaren (driven by Sir
>> Jack
>> > Brabham), a Brabham (2.5 litre motor) and a few others.
>> > Sir Jack had some trouble and pulled into the pits. Then he was out
doing
>> > some "adjustments" with a 3 foot long crowbar, but didn't rejoin.
>> > The last race will be televised on tomorrow.
>> And now for the 1million dollar question...
>> <drum roll>
>> "How did the closest car resembling a 1967 Formula 1 acted on the track ?
>> Was it sliding much as the cars in 1967 ? If not, was it due to the
>> modifications made after on those cars?"
>> --
>> -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard/Nas-Frank>
>> -- NROS Nascar sanctioned Guide http://www.nros.com/
>> -- SimRacing Online http://www.simracing.com/
>> -- Official mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
>> -- May the Downforce be with you...
>> "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
>> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
For Melbourne, I was amazed at the commentary proferred by the so-called
'experts'. If yellow journalism ever had a place in this world, it certainly
wouldn't be at a motorsport event! Especially at Irvine's first victory.
Gads!
If it weren't for the occasional (and rare) silence of the hams in which you
can hear the beautiful 10-cylinder music of the flats, I'd just as soon turn
the sound down.
I really like Bob Varsha. Even though he isn't a race driver (correct me if
I'm wrong) his commentary was always on the spot, and when you put him and
Derek Bell into the same booth, then you've got something to listen to! They
even respectfully shut up for the in-car views to enjoy the ride.
Naturally, he was sacked.
At least the video is un-butchered.
I last watched Champ Cars two years ago. Maybe three. In Surfer's Paradise,
there was roughly 1/3 of the screen devoted to the cars. the bottom third
was adverti***ts, and the left-hand third was pictures of the
man-in-the-pits as he wandered around fishing for sound bites. I didn't last
the whole race, and I haven't checked out a CART race since. Can anyone tell
me if they've changed their ways?
Mikey
> The suspensions of these 1960s cars were designed around a hard compound on
> a bias construction with a lot smaller footprint than current tyres.
> --
> Best regards,
> Bruce.
> ======
> The Stunned Mullet........seriously satirical stuff!
> http://www2.tpg.com.au/users/brucek/mullet/index.htm
> ===============================================
> >From what the drivers were saying and what I have read in the motorsport
> mags
> >the cars are as close to original as possible. The cars wern't sliding too
> much
> >but there seemed to be a few instances of severe understeer.
> >I don't think the drivers were really trying too hard. They were doing 1:32
> laps
> >and the V8 touring cars were down to 1:26. After all, some of the cars are
> >insured for over $1,000,000 US and the leading 3 or 4 drivers were in their
> >early 70's.
> >Also I assume the tyres are not going to be circa 1967. but modern
> replica's
> >that inherit some of the extra grip and stability of 32 years of science.
> >> > We just had the 2nd of 4 races televised in Australia with the 1966 to
> >> 1969
> >> > F1 cars. One of the Lotus 49B's boiled on the line then stripped 3rd
> gear
> >> > taking off. The other (Pete Lovely driving) led for most of the race,
> then
> >> > the Ferrari 312/69 passed a few laps from the end. Finally finishing
> 0.01s
> >> > infront of the Lotus.
> >> > There were also a couple of BRM's, a Lotus 32, a McLaren (driven by Sir
> >> Jack
> >> > Brabham), a Brabham (2.5 litre motor) and a few others.
> >> > Sir Jack had some trouble and pulled into the pits. Then he was out
> doing
> >> > some "adjustments" with a 3 foot long crowbar, but didn't rejoin.
> >> > The last race will be televised on tomorrow.
> >> And now for the 1million dollar question...
> >> <drum roll>
> >> "How did the closest car resembling a 1967 Formula 1 acted on the track ?
> >> Was it sliding much as the cars in 1967 ? If not, was it due to the
> >> modifications made after on those cars?"
> >> --
> >> -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard/Nas-Frank>
> >> -- NROS Nascar sanctioned Guide http://www.nros.com/
> >> -- SimRacing Online http://www.simracing.com/
> >> -- Official mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
> >> -- May the Downforce be with you...
> >> "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
> >> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."