rec.autos.simulators

Rfactor graphics performance

Larr

Rfactor graphics performance

by Larr » Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:44:12

Definitely something wrong.  I've got a similar system, but with a 3500, and
I don't have any FR issues unless I put everything on the absolute max.  I
have one or two things down one notch and it's fine.

-Larry


Larr

Rfactor graphics performance

by Larr » Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:44:52

Well, to reduce heat it slows the system down :)

-Larry



>> I had similar frame rates with a slightly lesser system (A64/3200).
>> Tryed for months to get a decent frame rate. Turned out the culprit
>> was the Cool'n'Quiet utility that comes with the ASUS motherboard
>> setup package. You have to turn it off in the BIOS. Frame rate went
>> from the high ***s -mid 20's to 100-120 fps. huge difference
>> Dave Erb
> Anybody else care to verify the Cool'nQuiet theory ? Running ASUS mobo
> here as well and not about to fiddle with something that's supposed to
> assist with :
> Reduces heat output from your PC
> Quiet PCs for a quiet home
> Can reduce PC power consumption

Larr

Rfactor graphics performance

by Larr » Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:49:44

I have proper cooling.  I have NO need for something that artificially slows
my machine down.

I can understand it for some, but I have no need for such things.

-Larry





>>> I had similar frame rates with a slightly lesser system (A64/3200).
>>> Tryed for months to get a decent frame rate. Turned out the culprit
>>> was the Cool'n'Quiet utility that comes with the ASUS motherboard
>>> setup package. You have to turn it off in the BIOS. Frame rate went
>>> from the high ***s -mid 20's to 100-120 fps. huge difference
>>> Dave Erb
>> Anybody else care to verify the Cool'nQuiet theory ? Running ASUS mobo
>> here as well and not about to fiddle with something that's supposed to
>> assist with :
>> Reduces heat output from your PC
>> Quiet PCs for a quiet home
>> Can reduce PC power consumption

> Oh there's no doubt that Cool'n'quiet is a good thing sometimes. However
> why not try it yourself? After all its easy enough to turn on and off and
> if it is the source of your slowdown it'll be immediatly apparent when you
> check CTRL + F for the framerate in game. As far as I can tell all CnQ is
> is a throttling device for your powersupply thats matches PS output to
> your powerneeds of the moment and switches fans to match heat output. With
> it off the PC PS cooling fan runs at full speed all the time thus creating
> somewhat more noise and putting more heat into the room. Mine has been
> totally reliable since switching it off.
> BTW I originally got the tip from some thread in either the GTR or rFactor
> forums in RSC. No idea now which of the thousands that it was but its
> there if you care to look :)
> Dave

RodP

Rfactor graphics performance

by RodP » Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:22:37


Deon says...


> > I had similar frame rates with a slightly lesser system (A64/3200).
> > Tryed for months to get a decent frame rate. Turned out the culprit
> > was the Cool'n'Quiet utility that comes with the ASUS motherboard
> > setup package. You have to turn it off in the BIOS. Frame rate went
> > from the high ***s -mid 20's to 100-120 fps. huge difference
> > Dave Erb
> Anybody else care to verify the Cool'nQuiet theory ? Running ASUS mobo here
> as well and not about to fiddle with something that's supposed to assist
> with :
> Reduces heat output from your PC
> Quiet PCs for a quiet home
> Can reduce PC power consumption

It does that by running components at less than optimal speeds. Less
heat generated by IC's, less rpm on moving parts like drives and fans.
The way a PC keeps things cool and quiet is to restrict its ability
to generate heat.

It does so on a needs basis. So that when you're running an intensive
process (i.e a game) you're putting more demands on the components in
the system causing them to heat up and use more voltage to cope with
the processing demand. A processor at 100% utilisation runs
significantly hotter than one running at 0% utilisation. A heatsink
fan will also then be required to spin at less rpm making it quieter,
etc.

A real performance killer if cool'n'quiet takes over.

--
Cheers,
Rod.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.