rec.autos.simulators

GRAND PRIX 2 - '94 cars

Tommi Pajar

GRAND PRIX 2 - '94 cars

by Tommi Pajar » Fri, 17 Nov 1995 04:00:00


> Mike Carrothers writes:
> |> The thing with both Indy and F1GP racing. is the are both computer
> |> races. The team who can set their computer to control the car the best,
> |> will win. With NASCAR, the DRIVER controls the shifting, the throttle,
> |> the brakes...A REAL driver/team series!!

> Huh? Are we talking about the same thing? How can someone compare real
> NASCAR series with Indycar, and real Formula One? I thought NASCAR only
> run around in circles and only use the brakes when they need to avoid
> hitting somebody and to make pit stops. Do NASCAR drivers change gears
> a lot? I suppose not... I thought they use the same gear throughout most
> of the race... Perhaps the driver is there to put his right foot on the
> throttle and his two hands on the steering wheel, and sit there for a couple
> of hours driving around in circles...

> Have you ever seen wet races in F1 BTW? It is the ultimate test of drivers'
> guts and skills.

Hmmm... Isaac, I'm sorry to point this out but it would appear that if
someone on this planet is clueless about Nascar, then it is you.. your
claim about Nascar drivers not shifting gears and not using brakes is,
to be honest, completely ridiculous. After I got Nascar Racing, my eyes
were opened; Nascar is, possibly, the most challenging and competitive sport
on the planet. Obviously you have never raced on an oval, or at least have
not raced enough ---> Nascar racing seems stupid to many people because it
is so different, but I tell you: there is no sport in my knowledge which
demands as much skill, cunning, and pure _ability_ if you want to win.
Money, unlike in so many other sports, won't make much a difference, since
the rules force the cars to be almost equal.. I once saw a Nascar race
where the winner started 44th on the grid. That tell you something? Would
this be possible in F1?

Tommi Pajari

Dave 'Gizmo' Gym

GRAND PRIX 2 - '94 cars

by Dave 'Gizmo' Gym » Sat, 18 Nov 1995 04:00:00



>HH> Ah well, at least GP Motorcycle races still hold my interest.
[...]
>I was right - another fan of _REAL_ racing!!! All this gob about ovals

[...]

As I understand it, Crammond was working on a "Superbike Grand Prix"
game to use the same basic engine as F1GP2. It is no longer listed on
their web site so perhaps they gave up the idea. Bombard

--

Isaac Wo

GRAND PRIX 2 - '94 cars

by Isaac Wo » Sat, 18 Nov 1995 04:00:00


|>
|> [snip]
|> > F1 demands the most physical strength from the drivers,
|> >if you know how much g-force they suffer throughout the 2 hour race. F1 also
|> >demands the most concentration from the drivers, if you know they don't have
|> >caution laps very often (maybe once or twice in a year?). All the drivers
|> >go flat out and try to gain split seconds in every corner.
|>   You mean that Nascar drivers dont go through all of this!  Give me a
|> break all racing requires alot of concentration from the drivers.  All
|> racing puts G forcer on their drivers,  you obviously dont realise how
|> much g-forces are put on a driver in a high bank race track.

Ha! I wasn't saying NASCAR drivers don't suffer from g-forces. For certain
they don't suffer as much. How many times do they have to brake from 200mph
to 50mph and accelerate back up to 180mph every lap? Remember, not only
the cornering g-forces that count, drivers also suffer braking/accelerating
g-forces. You obviously don't realize this.

|>   You are saying Nascar drivers dont go flat out!  Nascar drivers go
|> flat out all the time just like F1 drivers do.  Just because there are
|> yellow in Nascar doesnt mean Nascar drivers dont go through what F1
|> drivers have to.  I am sure both forms of racing require just as much
|> from the driver.

What's the point of going flat out during the caution laps??? Do they gain
any advantages of doing so? I thought there might be a few caution laps
every ~20 laps or so. I am sure during the caution laps, the drivers must
be in a more relaxed condition. Compared to F1, the drivers are concentrating
throughout the whole race.

|>>If you think that the richest team in F1 wins the most races, then I again
|>>point it out to you, you are wrong again. McLaren is among one of the richest
|>>team in the sport, however they are not winning for two seasons.
|>   Does a team with half the money of McLaren, or any other big buck
|> team in F1, ever win a race?  Enough said!
               ^^^^
Obviously you don't watch F1 races very often. I am sure Michael Schumacher
and Nelson Piquet both won races for Bennetton when it was still a "small
team" compared to the "big boys" several years back.

|>   What kind of experience do you have to say F1 is the ultimate
|> challenge?  Nascar and F1 are totally two different sports and each of
|> them are a challenge to who ever drives in them.  According to you,
|> any F1 driver can jump right in to a Nascar car and blow away
|> everyone.  I really doubt that this would happen, maybe after they get
|> the experience but not right at first.  But then again if you are a
|> great driver then you could go from Nascar to F1 or F1 to Nascar and
|> be a champion.
|>  Instead of putting down a sport you obviously dont know much about,
|> try and understand it first!  A real race fan can watch any form of
|> racing and atleast respect the fact the it is a challenge in its on
|> respect.   You just cant say one is more demanding thant the other
|> because you dont have any experience in neither.  You do have the
|> right though to enjoy one over the other and respect they fact that
|> someone else might enjoy something different!

Ok, what kind of experience (or theory) do you have to prove that NASCAR
is _as_ demanding _as_ F1?

--
Isaac Wong      (613) 763-6127 | Protel Compiler Group (Helpline ESN 395-4009)


http://chat.carleton.ca/~iwong | Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada

Graeme Weston-Lewi

GRAND PRIX 2 - '94 cars

by Graeme Weston-Lewi » Sat, 18 Nov 1995 04:00:00

snip>

At last, some more people with a taste for *exciting* racing. C'mon
Papyrus or Crammond, lets see a decent Motorcycle Sim. They are everywhen
in the arcades, why not at home ?
--

+--------------------------------------------------------+
| Graeme Weston-Lewis             Symbios Logic          |
| KE6HUH              snail mail: 2001 Danfield Court,   |
|                                 Fort Collins, CO 80525 |

| voice:  (970) 226 9629             Fax: (970) 226 9686 |
| "If its got more than 2 wheels - it isn't fast enough" |
+--------------------------------------------------------+

Hunter Have

GRAND PRIX 2 - '94 cars

by Hunter Have » Sun, 19 Nov 1995 04:00:00



Yes, add me to the list of one who wants a GP moto sim,
Accolades "The Cycles" is getting old in the tooth. While
I do love open wheel racing, I do believe it takes far
more cajones to race a 500cc GP bike than any open wheeled
racing car.  Hunter

Dave Bower

GRAND PRIX 2 - '94 cars

by Dave Bower » Sun, 19 Nov 1995 04:00:00


writes:

> As I understand it, Crammond was working on a "Superbike Grand Prix"
> game to use the same basic engine as F1GP2. It is no longer listed on
> their web site so perhaps they gave up the idea. Bombard


Aye, MPS were working on a superbikes game. Last news (about a month ago) was that they
were having problems with design - falling off the bike etc. The problem was, did the
rider actually depart from his bike as in real biking or did he stay on as in No Second
Prize, the old motorbike game from Thalion. Or at least those were the rumours.

Dave Bowers

Ty Auv

GRAND PRIX 2 - '94 cars

by Ty Auv » Sun, 19 Nov 1995 04:00:00

        Nope except a great game I like (not a sim but cool) is Road Rash

Stuart Boo

GRAND PRIX 2 - '94 cars

by Stuart Boo » Sun, 19 Nov 1995 04:00:00


>Yeah, I find ovals a total bore and snore which is
>one of the reasons I dont play Papryus games. And when
>you get to the road courses, the AI stinks in them.

That doesn't leave you much choice then!

Stuart.

--
From the bedroom of Stuart Booth,  
Somewhere in Guildford, England...  

TOBY BRANFO

GRAND PRIX 2 - '94 cars

by TOBY BRANFO » Sun, 19 Nov 1995 04:00:00

DG> As I understand it, Crammond was working on a "Superbike Grand Prix"
DG> game to use the same basic engine as F1GP2. It is no longer listed
DG> on their web site so perhaps they gave up the idea. Bombard

Were they? Oh WOW! Full coventional/nuclear *** launched as advised!

B-)

Cheers!

---
 * RM 1.3 U0414 * In DoubleSpace, no one can hear you scream !

Craig Hopki

GRAND PRIX 2 - '94 cars

by Craig Hopki » Sun, 19 Nov 1995 04:00:00



>I was right - another fan of _REAL_ racing!!! All this gob about ovals
>vs tracks, NASCAR vs ICR vs F1 misses the point. For a genuine racing
>sim we need a 250cc GP simulator.....very close racing, skill
>predominating, clean riding, exciting viewing......it's got everything
>except the sim!

>Papyrus? Crammond?

I am interested in almost all forms of autosport (motorcycles
included) and would love a 500cc World Championship Simulation.   One
of the problems I envisage is the controller.  

My T1 really gives me the realism (without VR or g forces ofcourse)
but how would we get the need to lean into the corners etc.   Back to
my Quick Shot Joystick I suppose.   I even built my own 'car' out of
wood.   It allows me to sit in a reclining angle for better control.
I could post a photo if anyone is interested.   Anyone else could
build one (I am no handyman) and it only cost me A$70 in materials
(not including T1).

A knowledgable friend says that the 500cc is not so popular in USA (is
he right?) so that might preclude Papryus.

Cheers,

Craig
**************************************************************

* Canberra, Australia                                        *
* IWCC #2 Marker Bindings Pontiac - Rick Higbee Motorsports  *
**************************************************************


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.