http://www.racesimcentral.net/,12269,1187599,00.html
Since Hockenheim is so much in the news these days (surprised it didn't make
it here, those German pics ...).
rms
Can't forget the picture of the crash :-(
http://eis.net.au/~bramwell/hockenheimcrash.htm
Probably pretty standard for the era, driver deaths were a fairly
regular event. If it was some unknown rookie it probably wouldn't have
made the national papers...
>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/fromthearchive/story/0,12269,1187599,00.html
>> Since Hockenheim is so much in the news these days (surprised it didn't
>> make it here, those German pics ...).
> Can't forget the picture of the crash :-(
> http://eis.net.au/~bramwell/hockenheimcrash.htm
How pleasant it would be to see such habits reintroduced.
Bruce
An other myth busted.
Although, I guess Senna died a few feet in front of Schumacher, live on TV
and still nobdy knows what happened.
Rudeboy
The alleged goal of "objectivity" of the press has been watered down into oblivion.
It is also interesting to see how a totally neutral text speaks to you between
the lines ("... (he) was evidently unhappy, according to a race official") and
carries it's own set of emotions.
---A---
> How pleasant it would be to see such habits reintroduced.
> Bruce
>>Gotta say it seems a very dry, emotionless account.
> An other myth busted.
> Although, I guess Senna died a few feet in front of Schumacher, live
on TV
> and still nobdy knows what happened.
> Rudeboy
There would be no mention at all that it was observed by a race official
that Clark appeared to be unhappy.
There-in lies the difference, I think, between objective (then) and
subjective (now) reporting.
All the best to you.
Bruce
Not the picture. The story talks about a Policeman and a competitor behind
him seeing the leadup to and the actual accident.