rec.autos.simulators

Starforce again

mike

Starforce again

by mike » Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:15:21


> http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> posted by I3thHouR

> Let me start by saying I am a developer and a Webmaster of a number of
> major Game related sites.

> I have 25 years experience in the Business thus I make very sure that
> I have fully researched what I comment about. My credentials precede
> me, I do not agree with or endorse software piracy. However to play my
> existing Starforce games I have had to crack them.

> Issues concerning Starforce.

> 1. They are based in Moscow so exempt from a number of the laws that
> we in the West rely upon. The 3rd Party Companies that use their copy
> protection are not exempt.

> 2. In Windows XP Starforce gives Ring 0 (super user level access) to
> Ring 3 (Standard users). In normal English this basically means that
> any third party application such as Trojans or Viri are given the
> ability to have full access the both software and hardware.

> 3. As many of you will be aware XP does have DMA/IDE issue thats
> dates back to its creation. In which if packets are lost during the
> reading or writing of a disk. XP interprets this as an error and steps
> the IDE speed down. Eventually it will revert to 16bit compatibility
> mode rendering a CD/DVD writer virtually unusable. In some
> circumstances certain drives cannot cope with this mode and it results
> in physical hardware failure (Most commonly in multiformat CD/DVD
> writer drives). A sure sign of this step down occurring is that the
> burn speeds will get slower and slower (no matter what speed you
> select to burn at). Starforce on a regular basis triggers this silent
> step down. Until it reaches the latter stages most peeps do not even
> realise it is happening.

> Excluding the Hardware failure, the normal way to cure this is to
> uninstall all the CD/DVD drivers and the Primary/Secondary IDE
> controllers. (Then reboot). If you did not know about Starforce, you
> can now be faced with another problem. Normally windows searches and
> reinstalls the drivers. However with Starforce present this can cause
> the system to either fail to find the hardware or fail to find the
> drivers. Creating the illusion that the hardware has failed.

> This gets even worse if you have SCSI hardware/virtual drives. SCSI
> virtual printer driver (basically any SCSI hardware/Virtual drivers
> present) As these may have to be removed before the other hardware
> becomes visible.

> 4. Because Starforce are aware of these issues (Including the Trojan
> Gateway) this is exempt from the EULA and could be deemed as "Gaining
> access with malicious intent". Not only would starforce be liable, but
> also the 3rd party company that endorsed/used that application.

> Ubisoft really need to do themselves a favour and dump Starforce. They
> have earned their quotas on the existing titles. So there is no reason
> not to make full bypasses available in a legit format.

> An example of my system using Starforce from a Ubisoft Game. My Athlon
> 64Bit 3200+ Clawhammer started running like its components where stuck
> on treacle, My Burn proof DVD writers created more coasters than they
> use at a state banquet and overall it was about as stable as a one
> legged man in a hurricane.

> It's not my intention to put the industry out of business (They are
> achieving that under their own steam), however using so called copy
> protection that is nothing more than a glorified Trojan Gateway is not
> the way to stay in business.

> Trojan Gateway:
> I do not make such a comment lightly and I have proof of this
> occurring and of exploits already using it. I have openly challenged
> Starforce to prove otherwise and their response was not to comment or
> to refer to the EULA (As if the EULA exempted them from installing
> malicious software). Although to be fair technically Starforce is not
> malicious, it just leaves the door wide open for software that is.

> In my professional capacity I am aware that a number of corporations
> that had been previously flexible about staff playing games during
> normal breaks. Now ban the usage of any 3rd party Games in the work
> place (Because of the Starforce security issues). Also a number of us
> who review games are now refusing to touch any games protected by
> Starforce as we are not prepared to compromise our system stability
> and security anymore.

> So basically if us reviewers will not handle them and the customers
> are now boycotting them. How exactly do Ubisoft intend to continue to
> sell games?

dumb people who have no clue will buy them. There are a lot of people
who have absolutly no idea about this. They then send thier "broken"
computer out for repairs. Some guy makes a buck, and they are happy.
It's called economics( or something like that)...lol..j/k btw

Mike
mls67

Jone T

Starforce again

by Jone T » Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:56:04

XP/XP Dualboot with a seperate ***/simming partition will limmit the
sideeffects of Starforce. Tripple boot would probably be best. Productivity,
***/simming and ***/simming with SF. :)

Jone T.

John Simmon

Starforce again

by John Simmon » Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:30:05


Starting with Vista, you will no longer have the ability to boot
multiple OS's from the same hard drive (or system?) that contains Vista.

John Smit

Starforce again

by John Smit » Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:45:18

Damn, I think I might have this problem with my cd burner. I just bought
some cd-r's from newegg and they were 48x but only would burn at 32x, could
this be the cause? GTR is the only starforce protected game I own, is there
a fix or a way to bypass it?
Uwe Sch??rkam

Starforce again

by Uwe Sch??rkam » Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:01:19


> Starting with Vista, you will no longer have the ability to boot
> multiple OS's from the same hard drive (or system?) that contains Vista.

Hmmm, some judges might take an interest in that fact.

Cheers, uwe

--
GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

cosmo_kram..

Starforce again

by cosmo_kram.. » Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:01:51

Easy enough to test...  Just remove the SF drivers from your pc (using
the Starforce Removal Tool - available on the Starforce website).  Then
see if your CDs burn at 48x.  I'd recommend a system boot after
uninstalling

Next time you start GTR, the Starforce drivers will be automatically
re-installed (you will know it when you are asked to reboot your
machine before GTR will play).

If you find that Starforce IS the culprit, it's up to you whether or
not GTR is worth the SF hassle(s).

The Other Larr

Starforce again

by The Other Larr » Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:31:41

Well now.   That sucks.

I suspect that's a side-effect of the image-installation process it will
have.

-Larry



>> XP/XP Dualboot with a seperate ***/simming partition will limmit the
>> sideeffects of Starforce. Tripple boot would probably be best.
>> Productivity,
>> ***/simming and ***/simming with SF. :)

>> Jone T.

> Starting with Vista, you will no longer have the ability to boot
> multiple OS's from the same hard drive (or system?) that contains Vista.

Uwe Sch??rkam

Starforce again

by Uwe Sch??rkam » Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:45:28


I tend to agree with the "don't blame on malice what can be explained by
stupidity" viewpoint, but to me it looks like another attempt by M$ to
"own" our PC's  and make it as hard as possible for the user to install
competing products on the same hardware.

Anyone remember M$ explicitly denying major hardware vendors the right
to sell multi-boot configuration machines under the threat of increasing
windows volume licensing costs to them?

All the best, uwe

--
GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

John Smit

Starforce again

by John Smit » Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:17:43


Made no difference, must be bad cd-r's.. I wonder what the Texas AG would
think of Star-force.

John Simmon

Starforce again

by John Simmon » Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:09:56




> > Well now.   That sucks.

> > I suspect that's a side-effect of the image-installation process it will
> > have.

> I tend to agree with the "don't blame on malice what can be explained by
> stupidity" viewpoint, but to me it looks like another attempt by M$ to
> "own" our PC's  and make it as hard as possible for the user to install
> competing products on the same hardware.

> Anyone remember M$ explicitly denying major hardware vendors the right
> to sell multi-boot configuration machines under the threat of increasing
> windows volume licensing costs to them?

> All the best, uwe

They have identified dual-booting as a "security risk". Technically,
they are correct.  You can boot into another OS and, with a sector
editor, modify system files of any other OS installed on the disk.  
Granted, that's out of reach of most people nowadays, but it's possible.
Uwe Sch??rkam

Starforce again

by Uwe Sch??rkam » Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:12:59


> They have identified dual-booting as a "security risk".

I guess they're on about the security of their account balance. MS
taking a stab at IT security always sounds a bit funny ;)

I assume they've also gotten rid of the possibility to boot off a CD /
DVD, network PROM  or floppy then? Oh wait, that's a BIOS feature, I
wonder if they'll pressure BIOS makers into removing that feature in the
name of "security", too. ;-)

All the best, uwe

--
GPG Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Bret

Starforce again

by Bret » Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:25:20

Your sarcasm is not lost on me Uwe, but your assumption is correct.
Google "trusted platform module" or "palladium BIOS".  Whether any of
it becomes accepted/mainstream to the point of "their" intent remains
to be seen.  But make no mistake, the intent exists, as do the efforts
to fulfill that intent.

This progresses as per some entities' plans, and Orwell could be
proven correct in "1984", save for the title.

/tinfoil hat off

...but just within reach here on my desk, along with my favorite Linux
distros.  :)

Have a great day,

Brett

John Simmon

Starforce again

by John Simmon » Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:34:13




> > They have identified dual-booting as a "security risk".

> I guess they're on about the security of their account balance. MS
> taking a stab at IT security always sounds a bit funny ;)

> > Technically,
> > they are correct.  You can boot into another OS and, with a sector
> > editor, modify system files of any other OS installed on the disk.  
> > Granted, that's out of reach of most people nowadays, but it's possible.

> I assume they've also gotten rid of the possibility to boot off a CD /
> DVD, network PROM  or floppy then? Oh wait, that's a BIOS feature, I
> wonder if they'll pressure BIOS makers into removing that feature in the
> name of "security", too. ;-)

> All the best, uwe

Actually, Vista is supposed to allow sysadmins to set user accounts to
not allow removable storage media to be used.  As for booting, I don't
think MS has an answer for that one yet.
John Simmon

Starforce again

by John Simmon » Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:36:04



And let's not forget those talented jhackers that can download,
disassemble and modify bios images. Even palladium is vulnerable to user
whims.

ZZ Busc

Starforce again

by ZZ Busc » Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:36:13

 >Your sarcasm is not lost on me Uwe, but your assumption is correct.
 >> Google "trusted platform module" or "palladium BIOS".  Whether any of
 >> it becomes accepted/mainstream to the point of "their" intent remains
 >> to be seen.  But make no mistake, the intent exists, as do the efforts
 >> to fulfill that intent.
 >>
 >> This progresses as per some entities' plans, and Orwell could be
 >> proven correct in "1984", save for the title.
 >>
 >> /tinfoil hat off
 >>
 >> ...but just within reach here on my desk, along with my favorite Linux
 >> distros.   :)
 >>
 >> Have a great day,
 >>
 >> Brett
 >>

And let's not forget those talented jhackers that can download,
disassemble and modify bios images. Even palladium is vulnerable to user
whims.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
So at the end of the day, someone will still find a way around it.

I mean no offense to the real 1%'ers, but because of 1%, 99% will get
screwed?
--
ZZ

<a
href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=0&t=1">Get
Firefox!</a>


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.