It's pretty obvious from the options what the webmaster at High Gear
www.simracingnews.com ) thinks.
Of course it's valid... after all, it's RC2K forum alone has over 20,000
posts :-)
--
Cheers!
Graeme Nash
/ Where have we heard that before!
No, Im saying High Gear is biased towards certain types of racing
simulations compared to others, almost at the level of wondering the
validity of it at certain times.
--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
Chris
>Is High Gear valid sim racing news website?
>--David Cook
Wrong! Its a good source of info and it must be ***y annoying for the
webmaster to have someone ruining an otherwise informative vote!
Jan.
=---
Andre
On Tue, 23 May 2000 18:07:40 GMT, "Jan Verschueren"
>Jan.
>=---
>GraDee wrote...
>> Yeah, Of course those who haven't voted should go and overload the pole
>with
>> as many votes as possible for "YES". Right?
>> Wrong! Its a good source of info and it must be ***y annoying for the
>> webmaster to have someone ruining an otherwise informative vote!
These votes are not for the webmaster.
Well, Ok, he'd like to know the votes as much as anyone but the are for the
general racing sims publics information and are often quite informative
about things.
If they votes are ruined by people then its just pointless, a waste of the
webmasters time and very misleading to viewers.
The poll has been replaced, because someone thought it was a good idea to
stuff the box...
--
Kenneth Verburg
Editor-in-Chief, High Gear
http://www.simracingnews.com