> I also program, and I am aware that bugs are hard to pin down and fix.
> However, I ALSO am a member of ACM, and if you'd read the code of ethics it
> clearly states that it is INFINITELY preferable not to program and then
> distribute code with known bugs. My main disagreement with Papyrus' Upper
> Management is that they did so in order to get the product on the shelf by
> Christmas. I'd rather have waited an extra year for a cleaner product.
I agree with your above paragraph but I'm afraid that the last sentence
is the killer. I can't speak for Papyrus and their financial situation or
business pressures but I don't think we would have ever seen NASCAR if
we would have had to wait another year. I think the code of ethics is
great but how many companies follow it. I don't see a release of anything
any more that doesn't have bugs. This includes versions of DOS, windows
Word Perfect, flight simulator.. etc These are companies with deep
pockets.
I just don't think we get anywhere by making blanket PUBLIC criticism of
them. Things like libel and slander come to mind. Like any of us that
have developed computer systems, they will learn to better estimate
projects, develop their expertise in the complex arena that they are
working in and ultimately give us better sims.
Regards,
Jeff