>says...
>>Since we got GPL 1.1, we got too many dedicated servers IMHO. On
>>the one hand, it's a great thing to be able to race online
>>whenever you want, on the other hand, the human beeing needs a
>>guiding hand, whatever it does. This is not given when you join
>>a dedicated server as no "Boss" is present to lead the event.
>>But what disturbs me most is: 1/20... 1/20... 1/20... 2/20...
>>1/20... and so on. I really don't know a solution besides maybe
>>people must make appointments in GSB about where to go next.
>>No offense to the guys running these servers, it's all well
>>meant and they're doing a great job, but I hope I made my point.
>The only real solution is to run in a league that has its own dedicated
>server where all of the league members can meet to run practice races.
>There's simply no viable method anyone could come up with to organize a
>bunch of independant drivers.
others literally jumped down my throat for suggesting that there is
something wrong with having all those remote server races with no one in
them. Their point was that they could literally join any race at any track
in a multitude of classes and race. My reply was and still is,that isn't
racing.
When I race online,I want to race against a large field of human
drivers. There is no fun in running against 2 or 3 drivers. Spa with a
small field. It's like running hot laps,and that I do off line.
We've gone from one extreme to the other. And neither one is great. But
if I had to choose,I would take the old way,no remote servers. At least you
had full fields,even if you had to wait to find a race with an opening. And
you were a lot less likely to disconnect if you were running mid
pack,knowing that another race wasn't just around the corner.
Joel Willstein