>Subject: Re: Better editor than IndyEdit??
>Date: 15 May 1995 21:21:47 GMT
>>You must be awfully new to the net to think I just started an ICR
>series.
> I am new and who cares who old the series really is.
It's not a matter of who cares. You insinuated that I just started a series.
I was setting the record straight. As for your being new, we all could figure
that out by the way you just jumped in and started babbling without thinking.
Mighty brave of you in this cold and impersonal world of ***space.
You have registered twice. Haven't seen hide nor hare from you with the
exception of direct e-mail copies of some of your posts to this group.
However, at this point, should I receive your registration, I can reserve the
right to reject it. That hasn't happened yet, there's been no need, for no
one has been so antagonistic toward the progress Papyrus is making as you.
Many of us have our requests and wished for 2.0, but we also have the sense to
understand what is good marketing strategy, which a track editor for a
simulation of this caliber is not.
^^^^
I KNOW you can't spell.
Well, that's wonderful, but we're not discussing a train sim. But if you
were able to create a high quality train sim for Lisp and Garnet all by your
little 'ol self, you should definitely take my advice and create your own
IndyCar Sim, make million$, and quit expecting YOUR track editor from Papyrus.
Fade away, I think not... it will be replaced, just as computers are. If not,
we'd all still be playing the original Zork. Don't hold us back just because
YOU want to hold onto a game that will eventually be replaced. Create your
own track editor for ICR 1 and continue playing that one. We'll move on to
2.0.
In the software world you're only as good as your next upgrade, and
expandability from the outside has nothing to do with it. Papyrus has every
intention of adding the tracks that belond in the set. Unfortunately
licensing prevents them from getting Daytona for Nascar racing and who knows
what obstacles will occur in their pursuit to finish ICR 2.0 due to the new
IRL. Word is he's put a clamp on IMS for ICR now too. That doesn't give us a
reason to createthe track ourselves.
I suggest you take a second look at your train sim... you seem to have
derailed.
Ralf
____ __ ___ __ ____ __
_\ \ /(__)\ | ( /(__)\ )( /(__)\ http://www.racesimcentral.net/~sabata/