> I agree with this one.. Agent is ***on many fronts but I tried every
> single newsreader there is and the rest is even crappier too ( I CAN'T
> imagine how anyone can work with newsgroups in Outlook..)
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"goyl at nettx dot no"
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--
I mean BOTH at the same time.
I wrote them about it, and after being grilled through several emails to
prove I was registered user (I was), and putting up with the shitty
attitude of the guy at the other end of the emails, I was finally told it
was being _considered_ for version 2.0.
That was, I believe, 4 years ago. I don't believe 2.0 has ever been
released.
Larry
> >Man, I couldn't agree with you more.
> >I bought it a long time ago, based on all the 'hype'. It's the worst
user
> >interface I've ever seen.
> >The damned thing can't even sort by subject and date!
> Just doubleclick on the subject or date header :-/
> Works only with Agent btw, not with Free Agent.
> >Options/Preferences/choices (depending on what they tacked on and when)
are
> >scattered across a myriad of menu's and sub-menu's, and the layout makes
no
> >sense at all.
> I agree with this one.. Agent is ***on many fronts but I tried every
> single newsreader there is and the rest is even crappier too ( I CAN'T
> imagine how anyone can work with newsgroups in Outlook..)
> Andre
> >I quit using it years ago.
> Perhaps you should give the latest version a chance then (you can use
> Agent full version free for 30 days now).
> Andre
