Does anyone know when Intel is due to do their next round of price cuts
(I have heard it may be August) and what CPUs they are lowering?
I need to get a P166 for GP2 - the waiting is not fun!
Does anyone know when Intel is due to do their next round of price cuts
(I have heard it may be August) and what CPUs they are lowering?
I need to get a P166 for GP2 - the waiting is not fun!
: Does anyone know when Intel is due to do their next round of price cuts
: (I have heard it may be August) and what CPUs they are lowering?
: I need to get a P166 for GP2 - the waiting is not fun!
I heard August 1st. My boss said he tried to order a PC and they told him to
wait until August 1st; apparently they had stopped manufacturing, or slowed it
down, until the big price cuts are announced.
-Scott
According to PC Week magazine, Intel quarterly price cuts will be August
1. to wholesale dealers. (with savings passed onto consumers appropriately.)
They are expected to be as follows:
CPU Clock Old Price New Price
Pentium 75 $105 $105
100 $134 $105
120 $188 $135
133 $257 $205
150 $364 $300
166 $498 $400
200 $N/A $510
Pentium Pro prices will also drop as well. (I'm not listing them here
because DOS does not run faster on a PPro.)
--
Robin Chung
Senior Performance Architect, MTI-IV Aspiring F-1 Vehicle Dynamicist
AMA#699255 HRC#HM402849 FAX:(510) 642 4769
> : Does anyone know when Intel is due to do their next round of price cuts
> : (I have heard it may be August) and what CPUs they are lowering?
> : I need to get a P166 for GP2 - the waiting is not fun!
> I heard August 1st. My boss said he tried to order a PC and they told him to
> wait until August 1st; apparently they had stopped manufacturing, or slowed it
> down, until the big price cuts are announced.
> -Scott
> Read in the paper last week the cuts take effect in August and average
> about 20%.
>They are expected to be as follows:
>...
Thanks for the accurate information.
This is a common misunderstanding. DOS itself has nothing to do with it,
it is the program itself that is 32 bit or not (and can benefit from a
PPro or not). Most programs today are still written as 16
bit-programs (some people think they are programming in 32 bit because
they tell their compiler to use 386/486-instructions, but they use 16
bit-integers as the default type of integer -to give an example).
/Scott
--
Scott Marison, Software Engineer
Sierra On-Line/Papyrus Division
: This is a common misunderstanding. DOS itself has nothing to do with it,
: it is the program itself that is 32 bit or not (and can benefit from a
: PPro or not). Most programs today are still written as 16
: bit-programs (some people think they are programming in 32 bit because
: they tell their compiler to use 386/486-instructions, but they use 16
: bit-integers as the default type of integer -to give an example).
this is not true.
most programs today are developed using Watcom C/C++ or the dos port of
GCC (DJGPP or something?).. these are true 32 bit programs. I haven't
seen a non-extended program released in many months.
i'm wondering if the ppro has a problem allowing programs which run
through a dos extender to be treated as 100% true 32bit programs... i know
there is a bit of a gateway, ie the dos disk access interrupts called
from a 32bit app are often passed to 16bit ISRs by the dos extender.
--
-------
Carlos Ribas
President
MalSoft
http://www.nol.net/~draconis
DOS yes, but not necessarily applications coded for DOS. I've been
comparing a P-Pro/200 with a P5-200, and the P-Pro is almost invariably
slower, at least until fastvid is introduced, wehn it closes most of the
gap.
On Quake for example, the P-Pro is HALF the speed of the Pentium.
Cheers!
John
_________________________________
__ _____| |_____ __
________| |__| :| John Wallace | |__| |________
\ :| |::| :| Team WW Racing TSW | |::| | /
> :| |::| :|_________________________________| |::| | <
/ :|__|::|____/ * Sim Racing News * \____|::|__| \
/______:/ \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/ \._____\
http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews
Not necessarily, even GP2 isn't a "true 32-bit program". There is 16-bit
code there also.
_________________________________
__ _____| |_____ __
________| |__| :| John Wallace | |__| |________
\ :| |::| :| Team WW Racing TSW | |::| | /
> :| |::| :|_________________________________| |::| | <
/ :|__|::|____/ * Sim Racing News * \____|::|__| \
/______:/ \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/ \._____\
http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews
>I need to get a P166 for GP2 - the waiting is not fun!
Dave - currently not racing because of a crashed 4GB hard-drive in my
P5 120 :(.
> >A P6/200 will run DOS faster then any current P5...
> DOS yes, but not necessarily applications coded for DOS. I've been
> comparing a P-Pro/200 with a P5-200, and the P-Pro is almost invariably
> slower, at least until fastvid is introduced, wehn it closes most of the
> gap.
> On Quake for example, the P-Pro is HALF the speed of the Pentium.
> Cheers!
> John