rec.autos.simulators

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

Don Wilsh

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by Don Wilsh » Sat, 31 May 1997 04:00:00

Subject: Alex Koziol of ***-Racing has just booted me out of the
CRAC...  Computers Racers Against Cheating.  

Drivers:

I was just informed by ALEX KOZIOL that I have been dropped from
the CRAC list because a some drivers called me a cheater.  I
have spent thousands of dollars trying the fix the PAPRYUS software
so it would prevent cheating.  

If I am gonna be kicked off the CRAC list than I want to know
who is calling me a cheater and what proof they have? I still
believe in the justice system and I would like to face my
accuser's.  If any of you drivers want to step forward and explain
why you think I cheat than give me your best shot and I will
try and explain.  

All of the non-sense could of prevented if PAPYRUS would simple police
HAWAII...

Don Wilshe, IVGA

PS.     Maybe I should treat this as a status symbol.  You win and
you get accused of cheating..

R.G. Koehler J

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by R.G. Koehler J » Sat, 31 May 1997 04:00:00


>Subject: Alex Koziol of ***-Racing has just booted me out of the
>CRAC...  Computers Racers Against Cheating.  

>PS. Maybe I should treat this as a status symbol.  You win and
>you get accused of cheating..

   Check out rec.autos.sport.nascar. that's what's happening
to Jeff Gordon, and Earnhardt before him, and Waltrip before
him, and Yarborough ..., and on, and on, ad nauseum!
    I don't like Gordon but have to admit he's on the best
team, and has the best crew chief available today.

Rich K.

*******************************************************
*Anti-spam: Change the "3's" to "e's" to write to me! *
*******************************************************

Ring

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by Ring » Sat, 31 May 1997 04:00:00



>>Subject: Alex Koziol of ***-Racing has just booted me out of the
>>CRAC...  Computers Racers Against Cheating.  
.

>   Check out rec.autos.sport.nascar. that's what's happening
>to Jeff Gordon,
>Rich K.

Well  he's the only Cheverolet Driver to win a race this year but his
car has never been tested in the wind tunnel.  The boy has to be
cheating.
Guanyao Che

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by Guanyao Che » Sat, 31 May 1997 04:00:00


>>   Check out rec.autos.sport.nascar. that's what's happening
>>to Jeff Gordon,
>>Rich K.
>Well  he's the only Cheverolet Driver to win a race this year but his
>car has never been tested in the wind tunnel.  The boy has to be
>cheating.

There is also a little something called talent... I think he wins as a
combination of talent, good crew chief, good car, good crew... etc...
--
Guanyao Cheng           "And I personally assure you, everybody here, that

http://www.uiuc.edu/ph   chess, I personally guarantee you I'll
/www/gcheng              tear it to pieces" -- Garry Kasparov
Anonomy

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by Anonomy » Sat, 31 May 1997 04:00:00


> Personally I didn't think you won that much Don  :)

> Higgy

> --
> http://www.racesimcentral.net/~higgy/


> > Subject: Alex Koziol of ***-Racing has just booted me out of the
> > CRAC...  Computers Racers Against Cheating.

> > Drivers:

> > I was just informed by ALEX KOZIOL that I have been dropped from
> > the CRAC list because a some drivers called me a cheater.  I
> > have spent thousands of dollars trying the fix the PAPRYUS software
> > so it would prevent cheating.

> > If I am gonna be kicked off the CRAC list than I want to know
> > who is calling me a cheater and what proof they have? I still
> > believe in the justice system and I would like to face my
> > accuser's.  If any of you drivers want to step forward and explain
> > why you think I cheat than give me your best shot and I will
> > try and explain.

> > All of the non-sense could of prevented if PAPYRUS would simple police
> > HAWAII...

> > Don Wilshe, IVGA

> > PS.   Maybe I should treat this as a status symbol.  You win and
> > you get accused of cheating..

  Well Don all i have to say you admited to cheating so therefore you
are considered a Cheater.I know what you are going to say is you did it
to show Papy it can be done but I take that as a Horse Sh*t excuse.How
does anybody know if you are still not cheating.As far as i know fron
some people who talk with Papy they are not doing anything about it
except of keeping track of the people cheating and thats all so they
will not boot you off the system.the penalties for it will come when and
if NRO ever starts.All i can say is you have only yourself to blame.
Cyber Racing Sportscente

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by Cyber Racing Sportscente » Sat, 31 May 1997 04:00:00

What is racing online about? I all depends on who you ask. There are
many racers out there that race online. Hawaii is more than a beta
testing division, it is a community. Those that have taken part in this
experience can understand what I mean. I have been racing online since
april of last year. I have meet many people online that I consider my
closest friends. I try to take an active part in the Hawaii Community by
bringing the news and ramblings that go on, to my web site, which I
update on a daily basis. It is almost a full time job. I am editor,
producer, graphic designer and president. I respond to each and every
e-mail I recieve. I spend 3-5 hours a day working on my site and enjoy
the attention I recive. My main goal when I started *** Racing
Sportscenter was to proudly report the acievments that the racers online
accomplished. I then created my top 100 driver list, at the request of
Don Wilshe, to honor those drivers that have showed how hard they worked
in their racing career. It was a great success. I even went as far as to
create bio's with complete backgrounds and pictures of these drivers. An
"in the spot light" kind of feel for the sport we love. And yes it is a
sport. I don't care what you say, this is real. I consider this a sport
because of the level of competition there is out there. But competition
has a drawback. There are people out there that thrive on this, like in
real life sportsmanship. And as in real life, if you have an edge on
your competition than you will excel. Is this wrong? It depends. What
are you calling an edge? There are no set guidelines for this. This
sport is in it's early stages. And like any sport that is just starting
out, there will be people out there that look for loop-holes and any
advantage they can get to become king of the mountain.

I have created an organization called CRAC, *** Racers Against
Cheating. There is nothing to keep us from cheating, but our honor as
racers. We have decided that honor and integrity is more important than
being labeled as someone that cheats. We take the game for what its
worth, we do not add to it and we do not disrespect our fellow
competition. The racing community can be assured that all the members of
CRAC will never under any circumstance do anything that will be
considered cheating. But what is cheating? Again, this brings up a
totally new issue. I am not going to cite exact instances of cheating,
but refer to it as a "whole". It is written in our mission statement on
our CRAC web site http://www.***-racing.com/crac.html

"The participants of CRAC have declared that by becoming a member of
this non-profit organization that they will adhere to the
following simple guidelines at all times on and off the racing circuit.
We at CRAC, hold honesty as our primary objective. Under no
circumstances will we use any other outside influence to increase our
performance in on-track racing. We will use the racing
Simulation that Papyrus has given us to the maximum ability we can as
drivers. We will not attempt to gain an edge on or competition
by cheating in any way. We will not intentionally use the game in any
other way it was designed. We will use the tools and resources
given to us by the base game and not add any other programs to increase
our racing performance. Our hard work and determination
is all we need to succeed. We assure you that when we race, it is in a
clean and sportsmanlike manner.

The secondary objective we will adhere to is treating our competition in
a respectable humane manner. We will not bad mouth
anyone for making a simple mistake. Be it getting into an accident or
causing an accident ourselves. No one is perfect, we are all
humans and we make mistakes. We realize that accidents are a part of
racing and no one needs to be treated in an uncivilized
manner for a mistake they made.

Finally, we will show our support for CRAC to our fellow competition and
urge them to become a part of this elite group of
individuals that have risen above the simple philosophy that "winning
has to be everything". We promise that we will not be tempted
to cheat, even if that is the only way we can win. Our honor as racers
is more important to us. Anyone caught for cheating will be
removed from CRAC and will be labeled by their fellow races as such.
This is a tight community we have here. I am happy to be part
of it and will continue to show my support for my fellow racers through
good times and bad times."

This is definately an issue, I look forward to hearing your comments

Alex Koziol
President *** Racing Sportscenter
http://www.***-racing.com

motisk

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by motisk » Sat, 31 May 1997 04:00:00

And with a little help from his friends (Nascar)  :)

--
--------------------------------------------------------
Brian Motisko

http://members.aol.com/bmotisko/private/index.htm
--------------------------------------------------------

Gave

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by Gave » Sat, 31 May 1997 04:00:00



>>Subject: Alex Koziol of ***-Racing has just booted me out of the
>>CRAC...  Computers Racers Against Cheating.  

   (snip)

>I was not one of the original guys that asked that they be taken off the list
>because you were on it.  However, I agree with Alex's decision based on the
>FASTLAP 96 controversy.  And from what I've read in this group + various other
>forums, that is what most people are complaining about. I dont think this has
>anything to do with Papyrus not policing Hawaii. As a person, you've always
>seemed more than generous in regards to helping others. However, the FASTLAP 96
>controversy and others associated with IVGA have raised some question in
>regards to 'grey areas' and the spirit of racing as described in the CRAC
>charter.

  (snip)>

     Having lived through the Fastlap96 controversy of extracting setup
information from the fastlap program without permission, and now Mr.
Wilshe ouster from a league, I think I like to add a couple of cents.
     1. Is there a difference between extracting a setup under the
        pretense of submitting hotlaps and....
         Extracting a setup from an individual under the pretense of
        forming a sim racing Team?  Volume seems to me to be the major
        difference.:)
        It's my opinion, based on observation that Teams are a major
        source of setup acquisition. Oh sure, the reasons for the
        formation of teams is always the ...track familiarity, share
        the track line info variety. But imo the bottom line was the
        slower teammate instantly got as  fast as the faster teammate.
        ( I'm trying to keep this light here..so :)  :) :)
          And O.K., I realize the "without permission" seems to be
        a point of contention, but on the other hand... if I knew
        someone only wanted to be my "teammate" to acquire my quick
        setups, I's tell em to get lost. So in that part of the
        matter I'd chalk it up to diplomacy,connivery, guile or
        social skill, whichever your poison;teammates or fastlap96!
     2.  Given all of that, what of the general consensus that a
         setup does not make one fast; that one man's setup is
         anothers' backmarker? I know I've heard that over and
         over in this group. So now I'm confused!
         On one hand, the acquisition of a setup is akin to thievery.
         On the other, setups aren't all that important; these two
         thoughts from the same mouths in this forum.

         So, I ask, in light of the fact that teams have never
         been fit into the equation what is Mr. Wilshe being
         dunned for?  The acquisition of worthless data or the
         method of obtaining the worthless data? Or the getting
         of valuable data and /or the method? Or the fact that
         that the data acquired wasn't done under the auspices
         of a team?
          Makes me laugh..the seriousness of it all! :))
          I realize the redundancy of the subject matter and if you
          find it offensive, boring,etc. don't read it.
          There is no intent to do anything other than stimulate
          discussion.

          Regards,
          Greg
          Gavel

Pete

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by Pete » Sat, 31 May 1997 04:00:00

Don, it seems Alex Koziol would rather advertise rip off leagues
than respond to email! At least he emails you!

Pete


> Subject: Alex Koziol of ***-Racing has just booted me out of the
> CRAC...  Computers Racers Against Cheating.

> Drivers:

> I was just informed by ALEX KOZIOL that I have been dropped from
> the CRAC list because a some drivers called me a cheater.  I
> have spent thousands of dollars trying the fix the PAPRYUS software
> so it would prevent cheating.

> If I am gonna be kicked off the CRAC list than I want to know
> who is calling me a cheater and what proof they have? I still
> believe in the justice system and I would like to face my
> accuser's.  If any of you drivers want to step forward and explain
> why you think I cheat than give me your best shot and I will
> try and explain.

> All of the non-sense could of prevented if PAPYRUS would simple police
> HAWAII...

> Don Wilshe, IVGA

> PS.     Maybe I should treat this as a status symbol.  You win and
> you get accused of cheating..

Preferred Custome

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by Preferred Custome » Sun, 01 Jun 1997 04:00:00

Personally I didn't think you won that much Don  :)

Higgy

--
http://www.racesimcentral.net/~higgy/


Paul Carillo

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by Paul Carillo » Sun, 01 Jun 1997 04:00:00




> >>Subject: Alex Koziol of ***-Racing has just booted me out of the
> >>CRAC...  Computers Racers Against Cheating.

>    (snip)

> >I was not one of the original guys that asked that they be taken off the list
> >because you were on it.  However, I agree with Alex's decision based on the
> >FASTLAP 96 controversy.  And from what I've read in this group + various other
> >forums, that is what most people are complaining about. I dont think this has
> >anything to do with Papyrus not policing Hawaii. As a person, you've always
> >seemed more than generous in regards to helping others. However, the FASTLAP 96
> >controversy and others associated with IVGA have raised some question in
> >regards to 'grey areas' and the spirit of racing as described in the CRAC
> >charter.
>   (snip)>

>      Having lived through the Fastlap96 controversy of extracting setup
> information from the fastlap program without permission, and now Mr.
> Wilshe ouster from a league, I think I like to add a couple of cents.
>      1. Is there a difference between extracting a setup under the
>         pretense of submitting hotlaps and....
>          Extracting a setup from an individual under the pretense of
>         forming a sim racing Team?  Volume seems to me to be the major
>         difference.:)
>         It's my opinion, based on observation that Teams are a major
>         source of setup acquisition. Oh sure, the reasons for the
>         formation of teams is always the ...track familiarity, share
>         the track line info variety. But imo the bottom line was the
>         slower teammate instantly got as  fast as the faster teammate.
>         ( I'm trying to keep this light here..so :)  :) :)
>           And O.K., I realize the "without permission" seems to be
>         a point of contention, but on the other hand... if I knew
>         someone only wanted to be my "teammate" to acquire my quick
>         setups, I's tell em to get lost. So in that part of the
>         matter I'd chalk it up to diplomacy,connivery, guile or
>         social skill, whichever your poison;teammates or fastlap96!
>      2.  Given all of that, what of the general consensus that a
>          setup does not make one fast; that one man's setup is
>          anothers' backmarker? I know I've heard that over and
>          over in this group. So now I'm confused!
>          On one hand, the acquisition of a setup is akin to thievery.
>          On the other, setups aren't all that important; these two
>          thoughts from the same mouths in this forum.

>          So, I ask, in light of the fact that teams have never
>          been fit into the equation what is Mr. Wilshe being
>          dunned for?  The acquisition of worthless data or the
>          method of obtaining the worthless data? Or the getting
>          of valuable data and /or the method? Or the fact that
>          that the data acquired wasn't done under the auspices
>          of a team?
>           Makes me laugh..the seriousness of it all! :))
>           I realize the redundancy of the subject matter and if you
>           find it offensive, boring,etc. don't read it.
>           There is no intent to do anything other than stimulate
>           discussion.

>           Regards,
>           Greg
>           Gavel

Well Greg,

If i was to give a slower teammate a setup to help him improve it is my
choice.The way i read your answer is that someone who gets help from a
teammate is the same as extracting a setup with out the user's
knowledge.I disagree with that for the simple reason that more than
likely people who end up teaming together race against each other for a
while before they team up.they will know the persons character and
decide from that experience.I dont see someone racing together for a
couple races then giving a slower guy a setup.Then i think you stated
something to fact that not all setups work for everyone which is true
but when you get a few hundred sooner or later you are going to find
something that works.I cant say Don is still a cheater but once someone
is recognized and admits he did cheat well then thats his own fault.

Just my 2 cents,

--
Paul Carillon
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
http://www.racesimcentral.net/~raven001/rmr/rmrframe.htm

Tom Eckel

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by Tom Eckel » Sun, 01 Jun 1997 04:00:00


> This is definately an issue, I look forward to hearing your comments

> Alex Koziol
> President *** Racing Sportscenter
> http://www.***-racing.com

     Alex..........

     It's pretty slow around here this weekend with HAWAII down, so I
decided to hit the R.A.S. group to see who's flamin' who<g>. Finding out
that Ed Martin has left Papyrus is definitely the top story of the day,
but your removal of Don Wilshe from the CRAC list is a close second.

     When I first heard of CRAC I was concerned that a rather large can
of worms had just been opened. While I think I understand the reason for
it's birth, and recent growth, I have stopped short of signing on because
I had no idea how you were gonna determine who was allowed to sign on,
and who was cheating, and how they were doing it.

     While I'll probably never be accused of being a member of the Don
Wilshe Fan Club, I am concerned as to how, or what, you used to determine
that Don was a "cheater", and how he got on the list in the first place
(if indeed that did happen). I would rather not see us drop to the level
of witch hunts and unprovable accusations.....for whatever reason.      

     Another reason that I have not signed onto the CRAC list is simply
because there are several names on that list that I am more than a little
suspicious of, and none of them are named Wilshe.......I'm not gonna name
names, or point fingers for the simple reason that I CANT PROVE IT. My
only course of action then is to not socialize, or race, with people that
possibly are hacking the system in some way. It could be that they are
just better than me, that's certainly possible, and I give this short
example to illustrate.......

     A year and a half ago under closed Beta, speeds of 183 at C***te
were awesome, and at that time I was suspicious of those folks because I
could only pull 181's on a good day<g>. Now jump ahead a year and a half,
and literally thousands of laps later, and now I can pull low 186's in
hot laps, qual at mid 185's and have a race setup that will run low
185's. The pisser is now there are guys that are running 188 laps at
C***te...and I'm still suspicious of them cause I cant do it. In the
last several months I havent been able to increase my times or improve on
my setup in a way that allows me to go faster. So I've hit the ceiling
and am wondering how these 188 boys are doing it. It could be a better
computer system, better steering system, or they could be doing alittle
subtle hacking...you know.....just enough to stay out there a second
ahead of you, no matter how hard you try to catch 'em?

     I was online the other day and doing a fixed setup race with the
FAST setup at C***te and all of a sudden there are a couple guys, well
known in HAWAII, pulling 183's with this setup.....well I would bet
money, based on my experiences in the last two years, that these boys
were cheating. NO ONE up until then that I have ever raced with could do
much more than low 181's with that setup, at that track. The fact that
they left before qualifying added fuel to the fire of speculation.

      Bottom line is I cant prove anything. So my only recourse, as lame
as it is, is to just not race with people that I THINK are hacking based
on the fact that they're always able to stay "out there". I'm here for
the competition, door to door stuff, and although its a gas to stomp the
field on occasion, and win a race hands down, I gotta believe it would
get old quick to just be out front all the time with no one able to catch
me. So ya won.......again......whooopeee!   What's the point???

      So I guess my "point" in all this is to say that if I dont sign
onto the CRAC list does that make me a possible cheater in everyones
eyes? Does having people on the list now that I suspect of hacking the
system invalidate the list for me? Do you understand what I'm asking
here? You've put up a blank piece of paper, for anyone who wants to sign
it to do so, for a unargueably noble cause, BUT without some kind of
criteria for signing on or expulsion what validity does it carry?

      Again Alex, I think what you're doing is very noble, and I enjoy
the hell outa yer web page 3 or 4 times a week, but I worry that the list
will be used more as a weapon and less as a tool, and that would be a
shame and a waste.

      All I can tell ya for sure is that if you race with me, you'll be
raced fair and square. I'm here for the competition, and to find out how
good I am compared to everyone else.....I cant find that out if I'm
hacking the system just to win. I dont win enough for it to be a concern
of anyones anyhow<g>.....but I wanted to make that clear.

      Sorry for the length of this post but I'm really missing HAWAII
this weekend......and for all it's warts it's still about the most fun I
have these days because of the COMPETITION. That's what it's all about
guys....am I wrong or right?  Send replys, good or bad, to my e-mail
address.....I dont get around RAS too often.

      Take care everyone

      tom


 HAWAII resident since 9/19/95           1997"   8     8    8     8
 Owner/Driver of the Kingsford                  8888888    8888888
          Charcoal Monte Carlo                 8     8    8     8
 Rolling Thunder Racing runs with CNSRL       8888888    8888888
 http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Gave

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by Gave » Sun, 01 Jun 1997 04:00:00


    Hi Paul,
   Enjoyed your thoughtful response! I have to agree with  you in general that
people usually do race against each other for awhile before teaming up. So
I guess it's a character judgement call there. But I think also that Teams are
the way people fish for setups. I think it becomes more noticeable to me
when I see one person on four or five different teams.  And if ever I've
asked about the reasons for forming a team, strangely, I never hear setup
acquisition as being a reason. I kind of think it's the dirty little secret
of teams, personally.
    I'm sure those deemed of good character may also have the motive of
obtaining setups as well. Hmmm I guess it boils down to, other than trying
to simulate a "team", you know..sort of a makebelieve thing, I see no
reason for their being. At least according to the justifications I've heard.
   If I want to learn a fast line, I'll race with someone fast and watch
the replay. So the "learn the line " reason escapes me.
    Since track temps and weather affect all relatively, then the comparison
of diff. setups to weather is a non existent reason.  I dunno, there's probably
more to consider but it escapes me.
    I guess most are concerned with the way the setups were gotten, as I see
no difference in the end result from a fastlap program  or a little social
grease. :)
     Thanks for the discussion. I've more to think about.
regards,
Greg
Gavel

Paul Carillo

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by Paul Carillo » Mon, 02 Jun 1997 04:00:00



> Well Greg,

> >If i was to give a slower teammate a setup to help him improve it is my
> >choice.The way i read your answer is that someone who gets help from a
> >teammate is the same as extracting a setup with out the user's
> >knowledge.I disagree with that for the simple reason that more than
> >likely people who end up teaming together race against each other for a
> >while before they team up.they will know the persons character and
> >decide from that experience.I dont see someone racing together for a
> >couple races then giving a slower guy a setup.Then i think you stated
> >something to fact that not all setups work for everyone which is true
> >but when you get a few hundred sooner or later you are going to find
> >something that works.I cant say Don is still a cheater but once someone
> >is recognized and admits he did cheat well then thats his own fault.

> >Just my 2 cents,

> >--
>     Hi Paul,
>    Enjoyed your thoughtful response! I have to agree with  you in general that
> people usually do race against each other for awhile before teaming up. So
> I guess it's a character judgement call there. But I think also that Teams are
> the way people fish for setups. I think it becomes more noticeable to me
> when I see one person on four or five different teams.  And if ever I've
> asked about the reasons for forming a team, strangely, I never hear setup
> acquisition as being a reason. I kind of think it's the dirty little secret
> of teams, personally.
>     I'm sure those deemed of good character may also have the motive of
> obtaining setups as well. Hmmm I guess it boils down to, other than trying
> to simulate a "team", you know..sort of a makebelieve thing, I see no
> reason for their being. At least according to the justifications I've heard.
>    If I want to learn a fast line, I'll race with someone fast and watch
> the replay. So the "learn the line " reason escapes me.
>     Since track temps and weather affect all relatively, then the comparison
> of diff. setups to weather is a non existent reason.  I dunno, there's probably
> more to consider but it escapes me.
>     I guess most are concerned with the way the setups were gotten, as I see
> no difference in the end result from a fastlap program  or a little social
> grease. :)
>      Thanks for the discussion. I've more to think about.
> regards,
> Greg
> Gavel

Good point Greg and i will say this i Have teamed with drivers a couple
Times but first starting With my Brother.It was to help in setting up
the cars to go faster If you have 2 guys working on setups and then
trading them for the other guy to try out you can usually pick up
faster.The people I have teamed with are not always faster but a couple
were.They were not faster at All tracks but some so we got together and
ended up helping each other out to gain speed at tracks were lacking on
plus we were able to improve on those setups with each others
knowlege.I  do this because i enjoy racing with the people I am
associated with and would rather have a close race than being blown
out.Winning is not everything to me but close competition is
great.Besides it still comes down to the guys on the other side of the
computer to do the driving which is were a race is won or lost.

--
Paul Carillon
http://members.aol.com/sschevy454
http://www2.netwide.net/n2ros/hts
http://www.wf.net/~raven001/rmr/rmrframe.htm

Brad Dawso

CRAC - KICKED OUT.....

by Brad Dawso » Mon, 02 Jun 1997 04:00:00



> > This is definately an issue, I look forward to hearing your comments

> > Alex Koziol
> > President *** Racing Sportscenter
> > http://www.***-racing.com

>      Alex..........

>      It's pretty slow around here this weekend with HAWAII down, so I
> decided to hit the R.A.S. group to see who's flamin' who<g>. Finding out
> that Ed Martin has left Papyrus is definitely the top story of the day,
> but your removal of Don Wilshe from the CRAC list is a close second.

>      When I first heard of CRAC I was concerned that a rather large can
> of worms had just been opened. While I think I understand the reason for
> it's birth, and recent growth, I have stopped short of signing on because
> I had no idea how you were gonna determine who was allowed to sign on,
> and who was cheating, and how they were doing it.

>      While I'll probably never be accused of being a member of the Don
> Wilshe Fan Club, I am concerned as to how, or what, you used to determine
> that Don was a "cheater", and how he got on the list in the first place
> (if indeed that did happen). I would rather not see us drop to the level
> of witch hunts and unprovable accusations.....for whatever reason.

>      Another reason that I have not signed onto the CRAC list is simply
> because there are several names on that list that I am more than a little
> suspicious of, and none of them are named Wilshe.......I'm not gonna name
> names, or point fingers for the simple reason that I CANT PROVE IT. My
> only course of action then is to not socialize, or race, with people that
> possibly are hacking the system in some way. It could be that they are
> just better than me, that's certainly possible, and I give this short
> example to illustrate.......

>      A year and a half ago under closed Beta, speeds of 183 at C***te
> were awesome, and at that time I was suspicious of those folks because I
> could only pull 181's on a good day<g>. Now jump ahead a year and a half,
> and literally thousands of laps later, and now I can pull low 186's in
> hot laps, qual at mid 185's and have a race setup that will run low
> 185's. The pisser is now there are guys that are running 188 laps at
> C***te...and I'm still suspicious of them cause I cant do it. In the
> last several months I havent been able to increase my times or improve on
> my setup in a way that allows me to go faster. So I've hit the ceiling
> and am wondering how these 188 boys are doing it. It could be a better
> computer system, better steering system, or they could be doing alittle
> subtle hacking...you know.....just enough to stay out there a second
> ahead of you, no matter how hard you try to catch 'em?

>      I was online the other day and doing a fixed setup race with the
> FAST setup at C***te and all of a sudden there are a couple guys, well
> known in HAWAII, pulling 183's with this setup.....well I would bet
> money, based on my experiences in the last two years, that these boys
> were cheating. NO ONE up until then that I have ever raced with could do
> much more than low 181's with that setup, at that track. The fact that
> they left before qualifying added fuel to the fire of speculation.

>       Bottom line is I cant prove anything. So my only recourse, as lame
> as it is, is to just not race with people that I THINK are hacking based
> on the fact that they're always able to stay "out there". I'm here for
> the competition, door to door stuff, and although its a gas to stomp the
> field on occasion, and win a race hands down, I gotta believe it would
> get old quick to just be out front all the time with no one able to catch
> me. So ya won.......again......whooopeee!   What's the point???

>       So I guess my "point" in all this is to say that if I dont sign
> onto the CRAC list does that make me a possible cheater in everyones
> eyes? Does having people on the list now that I suspect of hacking the
> system invalidate the list for me? Do you understand what I'm asking
> here? You've put up a blank piece of paper, for anyone who wants to sign
> it to do so, for a unargueably noble cause, BUT without some kind of
> criteria for signing on or expulsion what validity does it carry?

>       Again Alex, I think what you're doing is very noble, and I enjoy
> the hell outa yer web page 3 or 4 times a week, but I worry that the list
> will be used more as a weapon and less as a tool, and that would be a
> shame and a waste.

>       All I can tell ya for sure is that if you race with me, you'll be
> raced fair and square. I'm here for the competition, and to find out how
> good I am compared to everyone else.....I cant find that out if I'm
> hacking the system just to win. I dont win enough for it to be a concern
> of anyones anyhow<g>.....but I wanted to make that clear.

>       Sorry for the length of this post but I'm really missing HAWAII
> this weekend......and for all it's warts it's still about the most fun I
> have these days because of the COMPETITION. That's what it's all about
> guys....am I wrong or right?  Send replys, good or bad, to my e-mail
> address.....I dont get around RAS too often.

>       Take care everyone

>       tom


>  HAWAII resident since 9/19/95           1997"   8     8    8     8
>  Owner/Driver of the Kingsford                  8888888    8888888
>           Charcoal Monte Carlo                 8     8    8     8
>  Rolling Thunder Racing runs with CNSRL       8888888    8888888
>  http://www.racesimcentral.net/,

I have many of the same concerns as you about these "Crac" heads. I
consider Alex to be a good friend of mine, I would like to take him to
Louden with me (Im still looking ALex) But as you know I'm also
very good friends with RH and this whole Crac thing started as a kind of
Anti-RH organization. Your right you just have to say your not cheating
and your on the list. Well RH has said he isnt cheating but he is not
allowed to join. Also from what I have seen there are already a couple
of CRAC zealots who, if your not on  the CRAC list then your under
suspect, and if your on it then  your beyond reproach. Guys I dont think
this is what Alex had in mind when he started the whole thing. I wont
join it because of the way people are starting to label guys as those on
crac, and the rest. And the rest are all potential cheaters. I know Alex
doesn't feel this way but some of the followers out there do. I'm  not
thrilled with cheating but descrimination is much worse IMHO. I dont
think anyone thinks I cheat (lets hope Id run better if I did <g>) but I
know I dont, and thats enough for me. As you said, and even the cheater
haters have said, they are "cheating themselves" Guys your right, its
true, if some one is cheating they are cheating themselves. One of the
best races I ever had was with with Tom and KZW  a 40% dega race (I know
what your thinking) but it was awesome 1-4 all finished with .4 secs and
it was about 3 wide across the line. With KZW myself and WIlbur
Gidersleve crashing our party. This race had it all including me running
a std setup and being one of the *** cars leading 19 laps. I got
third and TCE was 4th and it was one blast I tell ya. Winning that race
could not have made it any better, and if you ran 5 seconds ahead of
everyone the whole race and then won? Not much fun there Id say. I wish
this whole cheating thing would blow over already. How aout an
organization wher people all get together and agree not to drive like
fools, and run into each other? I' d join that in a minute <g>.
Tom, hopefully I ll see you on the track.

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.