rec.autos.simulators

GPL: Braking question

David B. Harriso

GPL: Braking question

by David B. Harriso » Thu, 04 Nov 1999 04:00:00

Scott. this may illustrate this example better. Think of a Top-fuel
dragster slick. As it grows and balloons on acceleration the sides of
the foot-print leave the surface. The phenomenon of this thread happens
in sort of reverse order of the slick. If you've ever been close enough
to listen as a drag slick regains it's traction after a burnout. You
will hear a sharp "chirp" as the traction coefficient increases as the
tire shrinks and the inertia subsides to flatten out  or widen the
foot-print and the tire regains it's grip.
Hope this helps!!  DBH
Peter Prochazk

GPL: Braking question

by Peter Prochazk » Thu, 04 Nov 1999 04:00:00

Hi, guys!
I've read this thread for a couple of days now with great interest, because
I also wanted to know, why a non-locked tire sqeals and what it means that a
part of the contact patch is sliding while another part still has grip. But
unfortunately your answers didn't really enlighten my mind, so I've put
together my own theory.

<guess mode on>

You say, when the tire is near its limit a part of the contact patch loses
its grip. This part will be the one, which has the biggest friction force
and the least normal force exerted on it (which part it will be depends, if
it's while braking, cornering or accelerating or any combination of the
three). OK, but what happens then? This part of the contact patch will begin
to slide, i.e. to move relative to the track (sliding with reduced coeff.of
friction), but it will also move relative to the rest of the tire (and the
rest of the contact patch, which still has grip). Obviously this moving
relative to the rest of the tire can't go on forever (not even the few
seconds you spend braking for Parabolica ;-) otherwise the tire should be
ripped apart. The rest of the tire will exert a force onto the slipping part
of the contact patch, which wants to move it back in place (and which will
get bigger, the further the part has moved). Now this force should be
directed more or less against the friction force exerted by the track onto
the sliding part of the contact patch, thus reducing it maybe enough that
the sliding part will regain grip again. Anyway, as long as the whole tire
isn't locked it will force the part of *** which 'locked' to turn with
it. Of course, now the tire has turned a little and the contact patch
(partly) is made up of another piece of ***. The force, which wanted to
push the sliding part of *** back in place a few fractions of a second
ago will be more or less gone, so a part of the current contact patch will
start to slide again. And the whole procedure will repeat itself at a quite
high frequency. The whole tire will begin to oscillate at that frequency and
this oscillation will produce the sqealing sound.

<guess mode off>

What do you think? Reasonable? Complete nonsense?
Please let me know!

Peter
Vienna, Austria



> I'm confused, let me know if I'm thinking about this right.  When tires
> squeal, what's producing the sound?  It has to be *** sliding across
> asphalt, no? As long as no sliding is occurring, 100% of the tire's normal
> contact patch is gripping the road.  When you're cornering and the tires
> start to "squeal a little", some portion of the contact patch (say 10%)
must
> be sliding while the remainder of the contact patch (90%) is still
> maintaining grip.  Then when the percentage gripping falls below some
> critical point, the tire loses grip completely and you slide.

> It would seem to be a little different with straight-line braking.  Here
the
> tire is trying to slide straight ahead instead of sideways.  There's
always
> another contact patch right next to the current one.  In order to make the
> tire squeal, you would have to either lock the wheel, or reduce the size
of
> the contact patch.  The only way to reduce the size of the contact patch
is
> to reduce the weight on the tire.  Whenever you're breaking, you're
putting
> more weight on the front tires and less on the rears.  This could cause
the
> rears to "squeal a little" without locking the fronts or having the car
> slide noticeably.

> Does any of this sound right?



> > x-no-archive: yes

> > I think most people will agree that when cornering hard, tyres will
> > start to squeal a little before any noticeable sliding ocurrs, so this
> > _must_ apply to braking, too.

> > R.

Trip

GPL: Braking question

by Trip » Thu, 04 Nov 1999 04:00:00


>Hi, guys!
>I've read this thread for a couple of days now with great interest, because
>I also wanted to know, why a non-locked tire sqeals and what it means that
a
>part of the contact patch is sliding while another part still has grip. But
>unfortunately your answers didn't really enlighten my mind, so I've put
>together my own theory.

There's a BIG difference between a "locked" tire and a "slipping" tire. A
tire doesn't have to be locked to be squealing or sliding.

Trips

Don Jenning

GPL: Braking question

by Don Jenning » Thu, 04 Nov 1999 04:00:00

Peter Prochazka wrote, among other very technical-sounding things...

Okay, you lost me completely ;-)  I guess I'm saying that in cornering, one
side of the contact patch could move faster or slower than the other side.
It wouldn't have to go on forever, only for the split-second that it IS part
of the contact patch.  During the other 300+ degrees of the tire's rotation,
both sides of the tread would be rotating at exactly the same speed.

Peter Prochazk

GPL: Braking question

by Peter Prochazk » Thu, 04 Nov 1999 04:00:00

Well, OK... maybe I dealt with the word 'locked' a little bit too sloppy.
What I meant with a 'non-locked tire' is a tire, which is slipping (and
sqealing), but not has totally lost its grip (i.e. is sliding as a whole and
would be 'locked' while braking in most cases). I've also used the term
'locked' later in my post wrongly. Replace that with 'slipping' or
'sliding'.
BTW is there any difference between the terms 'slipping' and 'sliding' in
'racing-English'? My Cassell's translates them almost the same...

Peter
Vienna, Austria

Trips schrieb


> >Hi, guys!
> >I've read this thread for a couple of days now with great interest,
because
> >I also wanted to know, why a non-locked tire sqeals and what it means
that
> a
> >part of the contact patch is sliding while another part still has grip.
But
> >unfortunately your answers didn't really enlighten my mind, so I've put
> >together my own theory.

> There's a BIG difference between a "locked" tire and a "slipping" tire. A
> tire doesn't have to be locked to be squealing or sliding.

> Trips

Rich Clar

GPL: Braking question

by Rich Clar » Fri, 05 Nov 1999 04:00:00


> <guess mode on>

> You say, when the tire is near its limit a part of the contact patch loses
> its grip. This part will be the one, which has the biggest friction force
> and the least normal force exerted on it (which part it will be depends, if
> it's while braking, cornering or accelerating or any combination of the
> three). OK, but what happens then? This part of the contact patch will begin
> to slide, i.e. to move relative to the track (sliding with reduced coeff.of
> friction), but it will also move relative to the rest of the tire (and the
> rest of the contact patch, which still has grip). Obviously this moving
> relative to the rest of the tire can't go on forever (not even the few
> seconds you spend braking for Parabolica ;-) otherwise the tire should be
> ripped apart.

It can go on "forever"as long as the wheel is rotating.  Even when a tire is not
at it's limit there are always speed differences in the contact patch while
cornering (the outside of the tire has to move faster than the inside of the
tire).  This generates what is called camber thrust which tries to rotate the
contact patch (and tire and vehicle) and heats the tire.  The tire returns to
it's natural shape after leaving the contact patch, cools off and gets ready to
do it all over again.

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.