-Larry
> I dunno if you'd consider them showstoppers, but the physics bugs in
> n2003 that survived the patch are pretty bad.
> - RF tire temps on road courses
> - trick setups on superspeedways
> - low drag/grip levels in cup/bgn physics
-Larry
Example: "Byron Forbes Jul 15, 1:19 pm
On my GTR box it is clearly marked - "Distributed by Electronic Arts".
It's all the same arseholes......."
You replied with:
"Larry Jul 15, 4:48 pm
I think it's forgotten that Each version of NRx, once patched, had NO
SHOWSTOPPERS.
You can't say that about any of the EA Games.
-Larry"
Now, I type out a reply to "Byron Forbes". (Bear in mind that in my
hatred of all things Microsoft, I don't use OE to read usenet posts, I
use Google Groups. It's a little slow, but since I only read R.A.S.,
it's not a big deal). My reply:
"Darus Jul 15, 5:26 pm
I'm not sure where the hate mail for GTR came from, as this WAS a
NSR/NR2003 thread, but I have no problem with GTR. What's
yours?........"
I then check for for new messages and see that your message about
"SHOWSTOPPERS" and have no idea what you are talking about. I replied
with my succinct post of "HUH?".
As the thread moves along, I understand that you are referring to a
"showstopper" as a <negative> aspect of either NSR or NRxxxx. I take
that term to mean the opposite. Simple misunderstanding.
Mssr. Forbes and I then traded 3 three more posts and then state that
you never referred to GTR in your post. "I" never said that you did.
Hopefully you can see that it was not I that erred by replying to the
wrong post. Your post ended up in the middle of an exchange with Forbes
and I and you ASSUMED that my reply "I'm not sure where the hate mail
for GTR came from..." was intended for you. It was not.
> Example: "Byron Forbes Jul 15, 1:19 pm
> On my GTR box it is clearly marked - "Distributed by Electronic Arts".
> It's all the same arseholes......."
> You replied with:
> "Larry Jul 15, 4:48 pm
> I think it's forgotten that Each version of NRx, once patched, had NO
> SHOWSTOPPERS.
> You can't say that about any of the EA Games.
> -Larry"
> Now, I type out a reply to "Byron Forbes". (Bear in mind that in my
> hatred of all things Microsoft, I don't use OE to read usenet posts, I
> use Google Groups. It's a little slow, but since I only read R.A.S.,
> it's not a big deal). My reply:
> "Darus Jul 15, 5:26 pm
> I'm not sure where the hate mail for GTR came from, as this WAS a
> NSR/NR2003 thread, but I have no problem with GTR. What's
> yours?........"
> I then check for for new messages and see that your message about
> "SHOWSTOPPERS" and have no idea what you are talking about. I replied
> with my succinct post of "HUH?".
> As the thread moves along, I understand that you are referring to a
> "showstopper" as a <negative> aspect of either NSR or NRxxxx. I take
> that term to mean the opposite. Simple misunderstanding.
> Mssr. Forbes and I then traded 3 three more posts and then state that
> you never referred to GTR in your post. "I" never said that you did.
> Hopefully you can see that it was not I that erred by replying to the
> wrong post. Your post ended up in the middle of an exchange with Forbes
> and I and you ASSUMED that my reply "I'm not sure where the hate mail
> for GTR came from..." was intended for you. It was not.
