rec.autos.simulators

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

Rich

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by Rich » Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:30:52

ok i gotta convince my uncle that gpl is realistic , i'm looking for
someone to tell me it is.

are any of you are/ or were real racing drivers, engineers etc ?

i was thinking the other day too, has stirling moss, or any other
famous 60's drivers ever tried gpl ?

would be cool to see what they thougt, or ?

cheers

Rich

Dave Henri

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by Dave Henri » Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:24:13

  That brings up a couple of problems.  How does a real race driver who
probably has never used a computer racing sim compare reality with
simulation?  If you find a 60's driver who has regularly used sims, you most
likely would get a different review than from a driver who shys away from
'games.'
  I believe Jackie Stewart did comment on it once but the context of his
comments made it clear he was a neophyte when it came to Simming.  So any
comments he made would be colored by his lack of knowledge in general of the
computer simulation arena.
  Dale Earnhardt Jr. and Kevin Harvick are two youngsters on the Nascar
circuit and they have both raced online extensively.   They both have
commented on N4's realism(N4 is the equivilant of a child of GPL)  However,
there too you must take that with a grain of salt as both were employed by
Papyrus as experts.
  Finally we only have to look at Cart Precision Racing which was proclaimed
as the most real and most precise Cart sim ever...it wasn't  but the checks
Bobby Rahal and Mark Blundell cashed most certainly were.
dave henrie

Craig Jone

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by Craig Jone » Fri, 22 Jun 2001 04:55:48


<snip>
<snip>

LOL!!!!!  Nice one, Dave. ;-)

David G Fishe

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by David G Fishe » Fri, 22 Jun 2001 05:16:00

Jackie Stewart tried it and said in a radio interview that it wasn't
realistic. He said the real cars had much more grip, and were more stable.

David G Fisher


Jesse Blac

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by Jesse Blac » Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:23:36

CPR has some decent physics...its just not many people raced on PRO because
it is slower if you drive on PRO instead of ROOKIE...the one problem is that
the tracks weren't too great (very bumpy) so people had trouble driving in
pro (wheelspin on bumps=spin...but wait, that happens in real life...must be
unrealistic)...sorry, I enjoyed and still enjoy playing CPR so I have to
defend it.  I prefer it over ICR2, personally, because everything happens
faster in CPR (braking and turning...kinda like the real cars) and there are
a wealth of setup options I can*** with to make my car perfect...

sorry if I offended anyone *** CPR haters...if you would like, I
wouldn't mind hearing the reasons you find CPR to be terrible in the physics
department...maybe I missed something important.

JB


>  That brings up a couple of problems.  How does a real race driver who
>probably has never used a computer racing sim compare reality with
>simulation?  If you find a 60's driver who has regularly used sims, you
most
>likely would get a different review than from a driver who shys away from
>'games.'
>  I believe Jackie Stewart did comment on it once but the context of his
>comments made it clear he was a neophyte when it came to Simming.  So any
>comments he made would be colored by his lack of knowledge in general of
the
>computer simulation arena.
>  Dale Earnhardt Jr. and Kevin Harvick are two youngsters on the Nascar
>circuit and they have both raced online extensively.   They both have
>commented on N4's realism(N4 is the equivilant of a child of GPL)  However,
>there too you must take that with a grain of salt as both were employed by
>Papyrus as experts.
>  Finally we only have to look at Cart Precision Racing which was
proclaimed
>as the most real and most precise Cart sim ever...it wasn't  but the checks
>Bobby Rahal and Mark Blundell cashed most certainly were.
>dave henrie


>> ok i gotta convince my uncle that gpl is realistic , i'm looking for
>> someone to tell me it is.

>> are any of you are/ or were real racing drivers, engineers etc ?

>> i was thinking the other day too, has stirling moss, or any other
>> famous 60's drivers ever tried gpl ?

>> would be cool to see what they thougt, or ?

>> cheers

>> Rich

Thom j

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by Thom j » Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:04:22

The GPL basher is back trying again...Don't fuel the fire .
The thread will be worthless.. So let it die a quick death..

| Jackie Stewart tried it and said in a radio interview that it wasn't
| realistic. He said the real cars had much more grip, and were more stable.
| David G Fisher

Andrew MacPhers

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by Andrew MacPhers » Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:41:00


> The GPL basher is back trying again

To be fair, he's not a GPL-basher. DGF just dislikes what he perceives to
be the GPL brainwashing of this newsgroup. I think he works on the
principle that by unashamedly trolling he can keep some of us too busy
arguing with him to actually drive GPL. In fact if you look at it that way
he's a wannabe therapist, not a troll. He's trying to break the cycle of
***ion and promote an overall sense of wellbeing within the online
community.

I feel a group hug coming on.

<fx: conceals switchblade up sleeve>

Andrew "more power Igor" McP

ymenar

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by ymenar » Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:56:42


> Jackie Stewart tried it and said in a radio interview that it wasn't
> realistic. He said the real cars had much more grip, and were more stable.

Post proof or retract.

lol

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...

Peter Ive

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by Peter Ive » Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:29:56




>> The GPL basher is back trying again

>To be fair, he's not a GPL-basher. DGF just dislikes what he perceives to
>be the GPL brainwashing of this newsgroup. I think he works on the
>principle that by unashamedly trolling he can keep some of us too busy
>arguing with him to actually drive GPL. In fact if you look at it that way
>he's a wannabe therapist, not a troll. He's trying to break the cycle of
>***ion and promote an overall sense of wellbeing within the online
>community.

That's right.  You should only play any sim for a maximum of 6 months
and then move on.  It's the only way to get the most out of car racing
and, as an additional benefit, prevents any kind of over-fixation which
could lead to an unhealthy interest or even pleasure.
--
Peter Ives
Remove ALL_STRESS before replying
If you know what's good for you, don't listen to me
GPLRank Joystick -50.63 Wheel -17.06
Rafe McAulif

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by Rafe McAulif » Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:00:50

Didn't try it for very long (CPR) but I didn't want to when you have
the "help" options on by default, and drive quick laps by only holding
the accelerator key. And also OVERTAKE other cars... No braking or
turning required, ridiculous.

Rafe Mc



>CPR has some decent physics...its just not many people raced on PRO because
>it is slower if you drive on PRO instead of ROOKIE...the one problem is that
>the tracks weren't too great (very bumpy) so people had trouble driving in
>pro (wheelspin on bumps=spin...but wait, that happens in real life...must be
>unrealistic)...sorry, I enjoyed and still enjoy playing CPR so I have to
>defend it.  I prefer it over ICR2, personally, because everything happens
>faster in CPR (braking and turning...kinda like the real cars) and there are
>a wealth of setup options I can*** with to make my car perfect...

>sorry if I offended anyone *** CPR haters...if you would like, I
>wouldn't mind hearing the reasons you find CPR to be terrible in the physics
>department...maybe I missed something important.

>JB


>>  That brings up a couple of problems.  How does a real race driver who
>>probably has never used a computer racing sim compare reality with
>>simulation?  If you find a 60's driver who has regularly used sims, you
>most
>>likely would get a different review than from a driver who shys away from
>>'games.'
>>  I believe Jackie Stewart did comment on it once but the context of his
>>comments made it clear he was a neophyte when it came to Simming.  So any
>>comments he made would be colored by his lack of knowledge in general of
>the
>>computer simulation arena.
>>  Dale Earnhardt Jr. and Kevin Harvick are two youngsters on the Nascar
>>circuit and they have both raced online extensively.   They both have
>>commented on N4's realism(N4 is the equivilant of a child of GPL)  However,
>>there too you must take that with a grain of salt as both were employed by
>>Papyrus as experts.
>>  Finally we only have to look at Cart Precision Racing which was
>proclaimed
>>as the most real and most precise Cart sim ever...it wasn't  but the checks
>>Bobby Rahal and Mark Blundell cashed most certainly were.
>>dave henrie


>>> ok i gotta convince my uncle that gpl is realistic , i'm looking for
>>> someone to tell me it is.

>>> are any of you are/ or were real racing drivers, engineers etc ?

>>> i was thinking the other day too, has stirling moss, or any other
>>> famous 60's drivers ever tried gpl ?

>>> would be cool to see what they thougt, or ?

>>> cheers

>>> Rich

mark jeangerar

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by mark jeangerar » Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:10:14

I would certainly hope that's true. Looking at video of the era, that statement can't be
too far off.
--

Mark Jeangerard



Mike

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by Mike » Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:36:22

Asking totally stress-free... Peter, do you mean to say u managed to get GPL
Rank down to -50 in 6 months time (on a joystick)? If so.. then let me shake
any of your three hands... as u are an Alien o' GPL :-)

Mike





> >> The GPL basher is back trying again

> >To be fair, he's not a GPL-basher. DGF just dislikes what he perceives to
> >be the GPL brainwashing of this newsgroup. I think he works on the
> >principle that by unashamedly trolling he can keep some of us too busy
> >arguing with him to actually drive GPL. In fact if you look at it that
way
> >he's a wannabe therapist, not a troll. He's trying to break the cycle of
> >***ion and promote an overall sense of wellbeing within the online
> >community.

> That's right.  You should only play any sim for a maximum of 6 months
> and then move on.  It's the only way to get the most out of car racing
> and, as an additional benefit, prevents any kind of over-fixation which
> could lead to an unhealthy interest or even pleasure.
> --
> Peter Ives
> Remove ALL_STRESS before replying
> If you know what's good for you, don't listen to me
> GPLRank Joystick -50.63 Wheel -17.06

Neil Rain

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by Neil Rain » Sat, 23 Jun 2001 01:24:39

I think David actually made that one up, actually!

In any case, it's been said many times before that the lack of true
force-feedback (on the body, not just via the wheel) leads to a feeling of
"driving on ice", even though the actual grip levels being modelled are far
higher than that.

Normally when driving you will use the "seat of the pants" to determine
whether the car is sliding, whereas in GPL you have to use your eyes and
ears, which is a completely new skill to learn.

That's why computer simulations will *never* come close to feeling like
driving a real car, until we are sitting in simulators that can pitch and
yaw etc. to give the impression of G-forces acting on the body.

I saw a great video that Jimmi Bo put together which was a mix of real
footage of the '67 cars and GPL: I was amazed how similar the original cars
were to the "real thing" (or is it the other way round?  ;-) ).

You can really see the cars moving a long way on their suspension, just as
in GPL, and there was also a Honda going into a spin in a very familar
fashion!

I really think it's the lack of G-forces that makes GPL seem so different to
the real thing: but the funny thing is, the more you play, the more you can
"sense" what the car is doing, and the more realistic it seems.

I think this is true of many computer racing simulations: you need to get
"into the game" before you can really appreciate what's going on.

If you never manage to enter a corner at approximately the right speed,
you're never going to stand a change of making the necessary corrections to
get round it on the limit, and consequently you can't "feel" the edge of the
envelope, as it were.

When I first started playing GPL the cars seemed to have hardly any grip at
all, but now they feel much easier to control, as long as I'm not using an
"alien" setup!

Oh, and as long as I'm not trying for a PB at the 'Ring - that track is a
monster!


> I would certainly hope that's true. Looking at video of the era, that
statement can't be
> too far off.
> --

> Mark Jeangerard



> > Jackie Stewart tried it and said in a radio interview that it wasn't
> > realistic. He said the real cars had much more grip, and were more
stable.

> > David G Fisher

Peter Ive

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by Peter Ive » Sat, 23 Jun 2001 02:52:04



Is that earth months? :)

'Today, I are mostly playing...  GPL.'

BTW the statement below was purely tongue-in-cheek, based upon other
statements that I have read elsewhere in this ng.

--
Peter Ives
Remove ALL_STRESS before replying
If you know what's good for you, don't listen to me
GPLRank Joystick -50.63 Wheel -17.06

Bill Anderso

real 66/67 driver on gpl , has anyone ever tried it

by Bill Anderso » Sat, 23 Jun 2001 04:18:58

"Jackie Stewart tried it and said in a radio interview that it wasn't
realistic. He said the real cars had much more grip, and were more stable."

I have to agree with Jackie Stewart on this. Don't get me wrong.....I LOVE
GPL! It's my favorite sim of all time.

I have noticed though that the cars do seem to "skate" like they are on
water at ice at times and the cars do seem to lose control at low speeds
(35-60 mph) just like at high speeds at times. The rear ends of the cars
seem to lose grip easily making it easy to slide around turns at times when
they should actually just spin out or begin to regain grip at certain points
in a turn and slow the car down because of the sudden grip like in real
life. You get the effect that the rear end only is on ice in GPL during this
situation. It's just too easy to slide the rear end around to make a turn in
GPL.

You should also lose speed in turns when the front end pushes. Making a turn
smooth and not sliding tires much (especially the front end "push") should
always be the fastest way around any corner because you aren't scrubbing off
speed with friction. Of course you do want to hear a little squeal from the
tires from taking them to the edge, just not a complete slide or whip
around. This is true of any race car on asphalt. On dirt it's a totally
different story but of course there aren't any dirt tracks in GPL.

Of course I haven't driven a real '67 legend car so I probably have no idea
what I'm talking about.



> Jackie Stewart tried it and said in a radio interview that it wasn't
> realistic. He said the real cars had much more grip, and were more stable.

> David G Fisher



> > ok i gotta convince my uncle that gpl is realistic , i'm looking for
> > someone to tell me it is.

> > are any of you are/ or were real racing drivers, engineers etc ?

> > i was thinking the other day too, has stirling moss, or any other
> > famous 60's drivers ever tried gpl ?

> > would be cool to see what they thougt, or ?

> > cheers

> > Rich


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.