> What exactly is the difference between the graphics engine of say
> "The Need For Speed" and GP2?? NFS flies on my P100 16MB Stealth64, while GP2
> is still excellent the frame rates are (shall we say) disappointing. I also
> happen to think that the graphics in NFS are more than good enough, maybe even
> better than GP2. Is it that Pioneer Productions wrote a better engine or is it
> not a true 3D engine, why aren't more people going the same way, could the
> great Mr. Crammond have spent 2 years more frutifully and what are the long
> term effects of exposure to large doses of assembly language???
OK, try turning around in the NEED for SPEED. Can you see the track
backwards or does the graphics engine just turn the image of the
car around?
Try spinning a car and staying in the***pit view. Does it work?
I think NFS is a fair racing game, but the engine is not *complete* in
that it does not allow views of the scenery from any direction. I
think that while the graphics are nice, they are far from true 3-D.
GP2,Nascar,ICRI&II = 3-d environment NFS = On Rails Environment
Were you as disappointed as I when you first tried to race the Alpine
circuit backwards and couldn't? Man, I can get better laptimes at
Monaco going the wrong way <NOT>
You should also consider the physics of the cars. GP2 has much
better handling and responsiveness. Try editing an NFS track and
put some decent 90 degree corners in, or a hairpin. A 911 in
NFS has trouble getting around a 90 degree corner! I can get
my friend's 911Carrera2 around 90deg. corners quite easily at reasonable
speeds. Even my old beat up Starion Turbo gets around 90deg. corners
without too much trouble (If a little sideways :)
NFS looks realistic, and does great burnouts, but does lack true to
life physics.
NFS has too many different car models. It's like USNavy fighters
vs. EF2000 (patched of course). You can either model 1 vehicle
(F1, Indy, Nascar) very very well, or come close with 8 or 9
different vehicles.
Geoff Crammond has produced a game which simulates F1 very well,
and unfortunately the downturn is the requirement for a high
end pentium (or fast Cyrix :) You could try overclocking (if
you know what you are doing) or upgrade, or play with less detail
or VGA.
Jet (my opinions only - comments welcome)
