rec.autos.simulators

Bit of a rant - for the "Crammond Haters"

David Lyttl

Bit of a rant - for the "Crammond Haters"

by David Lyttl » Wed, 06 Mar 2002 05:21:18

But not everyone in the UK can get ADSL yet - only within 3 miles of a
suitable exchange. BT just doesn't give a stuff if you live out in the
sticks. Great AI is better.

Matthew Woodin

Bit of a rant - for the "Crammond Haters"

by Matthew Woodin » Wed, 06 Mar 2002 06:17:07

Both multiplayer and great AI is best :-)
Are there any stats about what type of connections most people have? I know
that broadband is on the increase but it would surprise me if most people
were
not on freeserve or similar. Then again, it is only the the PC racing
community
which matters.
And I do have GPL :-)
But I am quite bad at it (though improving)
--Matt

> But not everyone in the UK can get ADSL yet - only within 3 miles of a
> suitable exchange. BT just doesn't give a stuff if you live out in the
> sticks. Great AI is better.


> > > > Multiplayer is all very well if you are rich enough to afford to be
on
> > line
> > > > a lot. In the UK (where, I believe, Geoff is) most people pay for
> their
> > > > time online through the phone bill rather than via a flat fee so it
is
> > > > perhaps
> > > > not surprising that a UK produced game would emphasise the single
> > > > player game.
> > > > It's not exactly a consolation to those who don't pay their bill
this
> > way
> > > > but from my perspective I don't care about multiplayer. GP3 and GP3
> > > > 2000 had great AI and that was more important.
> > > > --Matt

> > >    So just to be clear

> > >  - all phone companies in the UK have a per minute rate????????

> > No, most people in the UK, who use the internet even a little, are on
> > unmetered ISPs.

> > ADSL, which has been recently lowered in price too...a mere 25 / month
;)

> > Once you have had decent multiplayer AI just seems silly.  Matt invest
in
> > some ADSL, buy GPL (for a fiver!) and start playing online.  Although
> saying
> > that, you can play GPL with a 33.6 modem absolutely fine, and there are
> > quite a few UK / european servers to choose from these days :)

> > All the best,
> > Ash

Gerry Aitke

Bit of a rant - for the "Crammond Haters"

by Gerry Aitke » Wed, 06 Mar 2002 08:47:22


> But not everyone in the UK can get ADSL yet - only within 3 miles of a
> suitable exchange. BT just doesn't give a stuff if you live out in the

You DON'T need broadband to race online as a client! 28.8k is enough.
Stephen F

Bit of a rant - for the "Crammond Haters"

by Stephen F » Wed, 06 Mar 2002 17:21:27


In Switzerland I have the choice between dial-up at about 1USD per hour,
flat-rate dial-up at 30USD per month, or ASDL / Cable at 40USD per month,
plus modem rental and a hefty installation fee.  ASDL is available in most
mid-sized towns, cable only close to urban centres.

I also vote for great AI.  I'm not saying great AI is better than great
multiplayer, but I think there is a bias in this group against the offline
experience, like it is for the great unwashed masses or something.  I've
said before I don't always have time for online racing.  Sure, in a global
community there is always someone out there on VROC, but often I just want
to run a 5-lap race right away, and if I crash out, I want to start again
right away.  Online your have a certain obligation to meet other peoples'
requirements for scheduling, qualifying, seeing the race to the end etc.  I
love the online experience, but I also love a well-programmed AI, partly
just for the sheer technical challenge of getting it right (the programming,
that is).

Stephen

Byron Forbe

Bit of a rant - for the "Crammond Haters"

by Byron Forbe » Fri, 08 Mar 2002 22:18:46




> > But not everyone in the UK can get ADSL yet - only within 3 miles of a
> > suitable exchange. BT just doesn't give a stuff if you live out in the
> > sticks. Great AI is better.

> In Switzerland I have the choice between dial-up at about 1USD per hour,
> flat-rate dial-up at 30USD per month, or ASDL / Cable at 40USD per month,
> plus modem rental and a hefty installation fee.  ASDL is available in most
> mid-sized towns, cable only close to urban centres.

> I also vote for great AI.  I'm not saying great AI is better than great
> multiplayer, but I think there is a bias in this group against the offline
> experience, like it is for the great unwashed masses or something.  I've
> said before I don't always have time for online racing.  Sure, in a global
> community there is always someone out there on VROC, but often I just want
> to run a 5-lap race right away, and if I crash out, I want to start again
> right away.  Online your have a certain obligation to meet other peoples'
> requirements for scheduling, qualifying, seeing the race to the end etc.  I
> love the online experience, but I also love a well-programmed AI, partly
> just for the sheer technical challenge of getting it right (the programming,
> that is).

> Stephen

   This is all getting away from the main point now really. No one is
saying forget about the AI. We are just saying that in the year 2002, to
release a "sim" without multiplayer over the net is a joke! GP2 had good
AI. A good programmer could have tweaked it a little and made it good
enough for GP3 in a few days! But where's the multiplayer that is
prevalent in just about every other genre? Where's the concrete
explanation?
Uwe Schuerka

Bit of a rant - for the "Crammond Haters"

by Uwe Schuerka » Sat, 09 Mar 2002 23:05:52


> If licensing is going to prevent multiplayer then good AI is the
> only answer. I would have some faith in GP4 extending the capability

I don't agree. Forget the licensing, make the game easily extensible,
concentrate on multiplayer and show Bernie the finger. The community
will come up with "Season updates" in no time straight, I guess.

Uwe

jason moy

Bit of a rant - for the "Crammond Haters"

by jason moy » Sun, 10 Mar 2002 15:10:56


> I don't agree. Forget the licensing, make the game easily extensible,
> concentrate on multiplayer and show Bernie the finger. The community
> will come up with "Season updates" in no time straight, I guess.

a. F1RC should show that the community isn't immune to legal threats
b. Doesn't Bernie own the rights to several tracks on the F1 calendar?
 I kind of thought that Spa, at least, was handled by Bernie nowadays.
 If so, we'd have to rely on the community for tracks too.
c. If a game were made that was nearly identical to F1 but didn't
include real names and drivers, it wouldn't surprise me if they were
sued anyway just based on similarities.  It hasn't happened before,
that i'm aware of, but I don't see why it couldn't.

Jason

Byron Forbe

Bit of a rant - for the "Crammond Haters"

by Byron Forbe » Fri, 15 Mar 2002 19:58:01



> > I don't agree. Forget the licensing, make the game easily extensible,
> > concentrate on multiplayer and show Bernie the finger. The community
> > will come up with "Season updates" in no time straight, I guess.

> a. F1RC should show that the community isn't immune to legal threats
> b. Doesn't Bernie own the rights to several tracks on the F1 calendar?
>  I kind of thought that Spa, at least, was handled by Bernie nowadays.
>  If so, we'd have to rely on the community for tracks too.
> c. If a game were made that was nearly identical to F1 but didn't
> include real names and drivers, it wouldn't surprise me if they were
> sued anyway just based on similarities.  It hasn't happened before,
> that i'm aware of, but I don't see why it couldn't.

> Jason

   Pardon me. I haven't been around for a while. What was the legal
stuff with F1RC?

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.