rec.autos.simulators

> HAS to be either Anistropic or AA Filtering on.  Turn them both off.

> I can hit 80+ easily with everything on with a Ti4400 P4 2.53 Ghz.

> -Larry

>> wtf...;)
>> I have AMD 2800+, 512 DDR (test also with 2 x 512), GeForce FX 5800
>> Ultra and i run Nascar Racing 2003 in 1600x1200 with full details,
>> and my fps is about 13 in race...whats the problem? (in 1280x1024
>> few fps more)
>> Windows XP, Detonator 44.03, DirectX 9.0a
>> (sorry my bad english)

>> pete

> I have close to the same setup. Same processor but 9700pro....so we should
> be close. I run at 1600x1200 2xAA and 8xAF with everything on but building
> shadows and average 40fps. It goes higher and drops to 25 in the back with
a
> full field at the green flag but generally averages 40fps. I would check
the
> vsync setting as well in windows. Also, this is in D3D mode,


> > wtf...;)
> > I have AMD 2800+, 512 DDR (test also with 2 x 512), GeForce FX 5800
Ultra
> > and i run Nascar Racing 2003 in 1600x1200 with full details, and my fps
is
> > about 13 in race...whats the problem? (in 1280x1024 few fps more)
> > Windows XP, Detonator 44.03, DirectX 9.0a
> > (sorry my bad english)

> > pete

> You can't run Anistropic and AA settings like that on an nVidia card, not
if
> you want ANY fps at all.

> -Larry

> > I have close to the same setup. Same processor but 9700pro....so we
should
> > be close. I run at 1600x1200 2xAA and 8xAF with everything on but
building
> > shadows and average 40fps. It goes higher and drops to 25 in the back
with
> a
> > full field at the green flag but generally averages 40fps. I would check
> the
> > vsync setting as well in windows. Also, this is in D3D mode,


> > > wtf...;)
> > > I have AMD 2800+, 512 DDR (test also with 2 x 512), GeForce FX 5800
> Ultra
> > > and i run Nascar Racing 2003 in 1600x1200 with full details, and my
fps
> is
> > > about 13 in race...whats the problem? (in 1280x1024 few fps more)
> > > Windows XP, Detonator 44.03, DirectX 9.0a
> > > (sorry my bad english)

> > > pete

> I was tested OpenGL, but its look terrible...but thanks enyway, somekind to
> nice hear at some ppl get same shit fps like me ;)

> pete

> > >>XP2200+
> > GF4 MX440 128mb o/c
> > 512 DDR 2700

> > 1024x768x32
> > NoAA or Antistropic

> > Testing session 75fps average
> > Race 45fps average starting line>>

> > This is what I get.  But I am curious if he is running D3D or Open GL.  I
> get
> > those frame rates with Open GL - D3D i only get 12-15 fps.  I posted a
> thread
> > earlier for help , or an explanation for this, but didn't receive any
> help.

> > Try Open GL and see what you get.

> > Mike

> should look any better.
> --
> Biz

> "Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
> alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and
> the....." - Ash

> > I was tested OpenGL, but its look terrible...but thanks enyway, somekind
to
> > nice hear at some ppl get same shit fps like me ;)

> > pete

> > > >>XP2200+
> > > GF4 MX440 128mb o/c
> > > 512 DDR 2700

> > > 1024x768x32
> > > NoAA or Antistropic

> > > Testing session 75fps average
> > > Race 45fps average starting line>>

> > > This is what I get.  But I am curious if he is running D3D or Open GL.
I
> > get
> > > those frame rates with Open GL - D3D i only get 12-15 fps.  I posted a
> > thread
> > > earlier for help , or an explanation for this, but didn't receive any
> > help.

> > > Try Open GL and see what you get.

> > > Mike

> OpenGL LOD mipmapping...where i found that settings?

> pete

> > OpenGL should look nearly identical to D3D if you have it configured
> properly.  Make sure your
> > OpenGL LOD mipmapping settings are similar to your D3D settings.  There is
> no valid reason why D3D
> > should look any better.
> > --
> > Biz

> > "Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
> > alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and
> > the....." - Ash

> > > I was tested OpenGL, but its look terrible...but thanks enyway, somekind
> to
> > > nice hear at some ppl get same shit fps like me ;)

> > > pete

> > > > >>XP2200+
> > > > GF4 MX440 128mb o/c
> > > > 512 DDR 2700

> > > > 1024x768x32
> > > > NoAA or Antistropic

> > > > Testing session 75fps average
> > > > Race 45fps average starting line>>

> > > > This is what I get.  But I am curious if he is running D3D or Open GL.
> I
> > > get
> > > > those frame rates with Open GL - D3D i only get 12-15 fps.  I posted a
> > > thread
> > > > earlier for help , or an explanation for this, but didn't receive any
> > > help.

> > > > Try Open GL and see what you get.

> > > > Mike