using an unfinished version that may not be representative of the final
product.
mike.
mike.
>>hehehhe,
>>any chance you'd let me in on which ones you do buy, so i can but laugh at
>>your naivety?
>You imply that you work for a magazine. You imply that all magazine
>reviewers are influenced by their advertsiers. Doesn't that imply that you
>have zero credibility...?
>....either way!
>Cheers,
>Richard
Z.
>>Did you ever wonder how Magazines have reviews before a product ships?
>Previews & betas. Surely you're not that naive to believe that you've been
>using the real version?
>Cheers,
>Richard
>>Did you ever wonder how Magazines have reviews before a product ships?
>Previews & betas. Surely you're not that naive to believe that you've been
>using the real version?
>Cheers,
>Richard
>>any chance you'd let me in on which ones you do buy, so i can but laugh at
>>your naivety?
>I do not buy any computer *** magazines. Laugh at that.
>Mike.
Z.
> You imply that you work for a magazine. You imply that all magazine
> reviewers are influenced by their advertsiers. Doesn't that imply that you
> have zero credibility...?
> ...either way!
> Cheers,
> Richard
> --
> We all bump into each other every day of our lives, and we render our opinions
> whether we know anything or not, and if anybody catches us out we lie...
http://members.tripod.com/~HOSHUMUNGUS
and
http://www.frontiernet.net/~godsoe/bolt/home.htm
> >Did you ever wonder how Magazines have reviews before a product ships?
> Then you should feel obliged to communicate to your readers that you are
> using an unfinished version that may not be representative of the final
> product.
> mike.
http://members.tripod.com/~HOSHUMUNGUS
and
http://www.frontiernet.net/~godsoe/bolt/home.htm