rec.autos.simulators

New screens Gp4

Alessandro Pollin

New screens Gp4

by Alessandro Pollin » Fri, 14 Jun 2002 19:46:03

20 new screenshots for GP4

www.m4driving.sm

Douglas Elliso

New screens Gp4

by Douglas Elliso » Fri, 14 Jun 2002 20:45:14


"il voto e' 92%

"Gps-created tracks are a leap in realism"
"Brings you a step closer to what you see on TV"
"Drivers will react to the pressure you put on them"
"The most accomplished F1 simulation yet made"
"Consummately executed and ultra-realistic driving experience. Another
masterpiece" "

What the HELL is wrong with PC Gamer?   To rank GP4 so very highly is bad
enough -but to rate it some 12% higher than F12002 is just shocking.

DOug

Andreas Nystr?

New screens Gp4

by Andreas Nystr? » Fri, 14 Jun 2002 22:25:58


    Yes, Harriers standing next to the track at silverstone.

    Maybe if i play OutRun on my sega megadrive on the tv.
    Ok, it doesnt look that bad, until you notice Processor Occupacy 3042%

    This is something left from the revs-readme, right?

    Yes. Its the best Scaletrix-simulation out right now.

Dont forget the futureproof multiplayer too. Lol :)

Douglas Elliso

New screens Gp4

by Douglas Elliso » Fri, 14 Jun 2002 22:27:52

LMFAO

It's microsoft train sim with tarmac

DOug

Nick

New screens Gp4

by Nick » Sat, 15 Jun 2002 02:40:31


PC Gamer UK? Was it reviewed by Trevor Witt? If so, then you can just rip
that review right out of your magazine coz he is Geoff Crammond's number 1
fan. I used to subscribe, but I got a little pissed off with the magazine
and dumped it. It is a fantastic game of Formula One to drive with the
keyboard, but it is not a sim. If they gave it +90% for being a great game
then that is fine by me, but giving it +90% for a simulation is just damned
wrong. They keep calling the simulation aspect 'anal' (because they think it
is massively detailed), when 'anal' should just be translated as 'arse'.
Their GPL review compared GP2 and GPL (ROFL!). NASCAR 1&2 got decent
reviews, then NASCAR 3 got about 20% ('all you do is turn left' was
basically the review). N4 onwards didn't even get reviewed to my knowledge
(although I got a N4 demo on a coverdisc).

Gunnar Horrigm

New screens Gp4

by Gunnar Horrigm » Sat, 15 Jun 2002 05:02:05




> > What the HELL is wrong with PC Gamer?   To rank GP4 so very highly is bad
> > enough -but to rate it some 12% higher than F12002 is just shocking.

> PC Gamer UK? Was it reviewed by Trevor Witt? If so, then you can just rip
> that review right out of your magazine coz he is Geoff Crammond's number 1
> fan.

is that the guy that once (not that long ago either) claimed a
keyboard was the ultimate car-controller, and that steering wheels for
our computers were just a load of bollocks that would make you slower?

--
Gunnar
    #31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
                                silence is FOO!

Jan Verschuere

New screens Gp4

by Jan Verschuere » Sat, 15 Jun 2002 07:10:10

I noticed a couple of big sell-outs in PC Gamer (that's right, I do mean a
publisher buying a good review in the magazine through an exclusive deal or
reserving lots of advertising space), but the last straw was the GP3 review.
Just laughable. Haven't bought a single issue since.

PC Zone is also losing it's grip on racing simulation reviews a bit, IMO
(Steve Hill is a nice guy, but he just doesn't seem to get Nascar <g>), but
they do appear to be more independant.

I think we've stumbled onto an interesting side track here... how does the
group regard magazine (or even web reviews for that matter) with reference
to believability and perceived skill level of the reviewers?

Jan.
=---

John Pancoas

New screens Gp4

by John Pancoas » Sat, 15 Jun 2002 08:13:59


  Fwiw, I don't hardly even read them.  To many politics/biases usually
involved.  If something sounds interesting, I get it and try it out.  Can
always get rid of it if it's a dog.

John

John Metco

New screens Gp4

by John Metco » Sat, 15 Jun 2002 10:18:16

well it is quite understandable

adverti***t


in message


message

> > 20 new screenshots for GP4

> "il voto e' 92%

> "Gps-created tracks are a leap in realism"
> "Brings you a step closer to what you see on TV"
> "Drivers will react to the pressure you put on them"
> "The most accomplished F1 simulation yet made"
> "Consummately executed and ultra-realistic driving
experience. Another
> masterpiece" "

> What the HELL is wrong with PC Gamer?   To rank GP4

so very highly is bad

- Show quoted text -

ymenar

New screens Gp4

by ymenar » Sat, 15 Jun 2002 10:33:47


> I think we've stumbled onto an interesting side track here... how does the
> group regard magazine (or even web reviews for that matter) with reference
> to believability and perceived skill level of the reviewers?

Unless it's by Randy Magruder (and I don't think he writes anymore), they
are useless for me except to give me a far and large warning of the pro's
and con's.

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- http://www.ymenard.8m.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...

Toad

New screens Gp4

by Toad » Sat, 15 Jun 2002 19:00:27


Isn't he the guy that said GT3 is the best racing sim on any platform?

Andreas Nystr?

New screens Gp4

by Andreas Nystr? » Sun, 16 Jun 2002 01:12:00

In swedish magazines, ive read that F1 98 wasnt any realistic, "Just look at
the blue water on the track at Australia, and what is that red thing?"

or that F1RC was realistic, since the reviewer could drive the same laptimes
as Michael Schumacher did.. hehe. good laugh anyway :)


Uwe Schuerkam

New screens Gp4

by Uwe Schuerkam » Sun, 16 Jun 2002 02:12:50



>> "Nick" wrote...
>> I think we've stumbled onto an interesting side track here... how does the
>> group regard magazine (or even web reviews for that matter) with reference
>> to believability and perceived skill level of the reviewers?

It's quite simple really: If I want good, technically correct
informations on racing simulations, I turn to ... RAS. Yep.
Most of us (even the gpl-bashers and gp4 lovers) are truly
interested in racing "simulations", and their opinion means a
lot to me.

Magazine reviews (print, that is, online is an entirely
different matter) are usually poorly written, don't focus on
the aspect that is of most interest to me (physics, online
play) and are usually written to fit a certain time frame
(read: hastily ;-)

Yep, RAS is where I go when I want to know what a sim is really
like.

Cheers,

uwe

--
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
PGP Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Dave Henri

New screens Gp4

by Dave Henri » Sun, 16 Jun 2002 14:45:39


      That's odd, the only Sweedish magazines we get here in the States
don't seem to have much sim stuff in them...
dave (!) henrie

Randy Magrud

New screens Gp4

by Randy Magrud » Fri, 12 Jul 2002 21:25:58




> > Unless it's by Randy Magruder (and I don't think he writes anymore), they
> > are useless for me except to give me a far and large warning of the pro's
> > and con's.

> Isn't he the guy that said GT3 is the best racing sim on any platform?

OOH my ears are burning!

I *do* write.  I just did reviews of Le Mans 24 hours and F1 2002 for
the PC on IGN PC (pc.ign.com).

I still do some DigitalSports writing from time to time as well.

As far as the GT3 question.  I don't think I said that, but I might
have said something similar because GPL came out AFTER GT3 did.  I
believe my main point about GT3 was that at the time it was the best
DRIVING game, but not the best RACING game (the racing is actually
pretty pathetic).  The best Racing game I've played, at least against
the computer, would be Jarrett & Labonte Stock Car Racing for the PSX
(known properly and internationally as World Touring Car Championship)
by Codemasters.  After that gem, GPL, NASCAR 2002 and F1 2002 all
share the stage, though the latter 3 are more realistic physics-wise
than J&L was, obviously, but again, I differentiate between the
driving model and the racing action.

Randy


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.