rec.autos.simulators

In defense of NASREV...

Larr

In defense of NASREV...

by Larr » Tue, 23 Mar 1999 04:00:00

That about sums it up.

-Larry


> 1- Ridiculous system requirements for all the cartoony graphics.
> 2- Lousy sound.
> 3- The spotter is blind.
> 4- Terrible car control.
> 5- The worst AI in any driving title of any kind.
> 6- No control under caution.
> 7- The stupid way pitting is handled.
> 8- Rrevved's famous "slow-motion" game engine.
> 9- Ineffective car setup capability.
> 10- Absolutely zero customizability.
> 11- a useless in car view.
> 12- It's expensive.

Larr

In defense of NASREV...

by Larr » Tue, 23 Mar 1999 04:00:00

Wow.  Only two messages deep, and he's already getting personal.

You broke your record, Rodster!

Now, go away.

-Larry


> No I was referring to people like you.

Larr

In defense of NASREV...

by Larr » Tue, 23 Mar 1999 04:00:00

Or the inevitable spew from the Rodster :(

-Larry


> Get ready for the flames from the Nascar 2 bozo's on this NG.

Larr

In defense of NASREV...

by Larr » Tue, 23 Mar 1999 04:00:00

I found that hilarious.

And accurate.

-Larry


> Gameplay:  6

Larr

In defense of NASREV...

by Larr » Tue, 23 Mar 1999 04:00:00

I prefer to watch my Siamese Cat spin around trying to catch his tail.
At least he does it in real time!

He also corners better than the car in NasRev.

-Larry


> hehe...

> Think iF-22 quality, if it ran in slow-motion at 1/3 the normal speed.
> Now you've been Revolutionized...


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.