Well, all I can say is that folks in my area are not fond of the DSL service
at all.
-Larry
> I would say just the opposite Larry. DSL seems to be solid as a rock
> whereas cable is iffy at best.
> I decided that bandwidth isnt the key issue for me and my family.
> Low/consistent latency is worth the extra $15/mo. Bear in mind though I
> live <3k/ft from the CO so I get exceptionally good lats.
> As always in this stuff, your mileage may vary... Too many variables.
> > In most cases, I think Cable is better IF the cable company runs and
> > provisions it correctly.
> > The predicted horror stories of 'shared bandwidth' never really did
> > materialize. I sure don't notice it.
> > That doesn't mean I haven't had trouble. It's been a real battle with
Cox
> > and their conversion from RoadRunner. A nightmare is more accurate.
But
> > that's because of Cox, not the cable itself.
> > If it's run right, it's fine.
> > -Larry
> > > I'm currently using Bellsouth ADSL but the cable company (Charter
> > > communications) made me an offer I couldnt refuse. (or at least think
> hard
> > > about) My DSL 95% of the time only connects around 600mbs anyway and
> cable
> > > promises 1.3. To those with cable...how is it? Any horror stories? Had
> > both??
> > > Which is better? All opinions appreciated.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dan