rec.autos.simulators

Nascar 1999- not realistic, but that is okay

ymenar

Nascar 1999- not realistic, but that is okay

by ymenar » Mon, 22 Feb 1999 04:00:00

BRYNICEGUY wrote

Hmm that's not the case on the NROS.  Even if the N2 track has different
parameters, the only way to do 125's is to say low, I mean -low- ( ;-D )
all the way in the turns.

And I did some test at Bristol, and with my setups I was able to do an easy
125mph lap with the car staying all the way low on lap 4.  If you want the
replay I can upload it it's only 300kb.  I did the same with the trucks and
I did after 4 laps a 123.

Stay low at Bristol or your setup is not good.

-= Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard/Nas-Frank>
-= NROS Nascar sanctioned Guide http://www.racesimcentral.net/
-= SimRacing Online http://www.racesimcentral.net/
-= Official mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
-= May the Downforce be with you...

"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."

BRYNICEG

Nascar 1999- not realistic, but that is okay

by BRYNICEG » Tue, 23 Feb 1999 04:00:00

 I see a lot of arguements on different message boards about how realistic or
not certain software titles are. Well, Nascar 1999 by Papyrus is not realistic
when it comes to Bristol. Anyone who has ever seen a race at Bristol knows that
you need to stay on the bottom or you go to the back. On N99, the higher grove
is the fast way around the track. This is not realistic; however, I ran a 100
lap truck race today and there were 52 lead changes. 52 lead changes in 100
laps, now that was  fun! Remember fun?

Brian

Metro6

Nascar 1999- not realistic, but that is okay

by Metro6 » Tue, 23 Feb 1999 04:00:00

Could you please send me the replay and the setup?

======================

======================

Raymond Adam

Nascar 1999- not realistic, but that is okay

by Raymond Adam » Fri, 26 Feb 1999 04:00:00

In NASCAR 1999 I ran a 500 lap race at Bristol and had around 88 lead changes.

>  I see a lot of arguements on different message boards about how realistic or
> not certain software titles are. Well, Nascar 1999 by Papyrus is not realistic
> when it comes to Bristol. Anyone who has ever seen a race at Bristol knows that
> you need to stay on the bottom or you go to the back. On N99, the higher grove
> is the fast way around the track. This is not realistic; however, I ran a 100
> lap truck race today and there were 52 lead changes. 52 lead changes in 100
> laps, now that was  fun! Remember fun?

> Brian


1. NASCAR 1999 - Not Impressed

2. Okay, Okay, Okay, where's Leo Getts?

3. EB changes release dates of Nascar 1999 and Nascar 3.

4. Nascar 2/ Nascar 1999 Survey...

5. Nascar headquarter for nascar 1999

6. Indy Car Racing 2, Nascar 1, GPL, GP3, NASCAR 1999 and more ....

7. I am not playing NASCAR 2 right now!!!

8. Nascar 2...a short realistic wishlist

9. Nascar 2?? Realistic Damage

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.