You know, if that is what you would have originally said, I would have
AGREED with you and moved on. Because you are correct with that
statement. But that isn't even close to what you said...
Sure, everyone is entitled to their opinions. I completely agree with
that and stand up for their right to do so. However, when putting forth
their opinion as FACT (and telling someone else so), then they need to
either say that it IS their opinion, or do the proper research. They did
neither, nor did you.
So you think that I should not say something at all when someone makes
erroneous claims about our mod? And let you save face by not
disagreeing with you? You're full of ***if you say that. I have just
as much right to be on here as anyone else, and if someone makes some
incorrect comments about something WE BUILT, I am MORE than within my
rights to correct them. And quit pulling this PWF vs The Pits crap. I
in no means insulted PWF at all, I asked you to clarify what means you
were using to judge both mods, which both have their (known) faults.
Stand up for what you're saying, instead of trying to drag this other
***into it. HE said something that was incorrect, YOU did too, and I
corrected you. And since you still want to argue that point, let's
rewind one more time...
Timmy said:
What graphics? The cars? The menu screen? The***pit? And I'm not
going into the other comments, which some of them were easy to prove
incorrect, such as the "more downloadable cars".
Haqsau said:
(and then went on to make an example of the Viper)
Car models? I notice you didn't mention the GT, Mustang or Corvette.
Is it perhaps that they have JUST AS GOOD quality with PWF? Had the
original person or you made the comment I quoted at the top of this post,
I would have not said a word and moved on. Frankly, I didn't
even realise there was a problem with the rear of our Viper, but after
you made that comment I went back and asked our 3do guys and they told
me that they had noticed it later, but fixing it would require remapping
the car (and thus scrapping a ton of paintjobs).
And that's for your comment about the fact that I'd rather argue than fix problem.
Oh, really? You're going to "grind my face in it?" Hmmmmmmm.
The reason it didn't work is because your point was invalid, and because I DO give
a shit. I have perfect right to correct someone who incorrectly comments about our mod,
and if you look back in the RAS archives and on several message boards,
I think you'll find that PWF has also made similar comments when someone
incorrectly commented about them or their mods. Are they not allowed to
do so as well? You'll even find examples of Papy employees (and other
company reps) who have commented on RAS to defend themselves against
some incorrect statements. Did YOU decide that they should not do so either?
If you look back in RAS archives, you'll find several examples of where
I defend The Pits against incorrect comments...well before you ever
posted on RAS. I will continue to do so as long as I run The Pits, and
most of the people here on RAS (who have been around awhile) know and
understand that. And I'm certainly not going to back down because you
disagreed with my assessment. As I state at the top of this
thread...when you're correct (and doing it constructively), I'll be glad
to uphold your right to make ANY comment about our mod.
Cheers!
Jan