rec.autos.simulators

by **David Kar** » Thu, 23 Mar 2000 04:00:00

When the Babelfish fails--ha!, Puny and Insipid Minnow!--bring out the big
gun: the Dialectizer (http://www.racesimcentral.net/).

Expert and Instant Translations!, in your choice of colorful flavors, one of
which is "Redneck":

"Heck, ah hate f1 racin' mahse'f, but ah tell ya this hyar much, an' whuffo'
ah keep mah mouth shet about it. Its mighty simple, eff'n yo' kin't beat
their game WITH PROOF, THE SHUVE IT yo' stoopid idiot"

--DK

> > >Heck, I hate f1 racing myself, but I tell ya this much, and
> > why I keep my
> > >mouth shut about it. Its very simple, if you can't beat their
> > game WITH
> > >PROOF, THE SHUVE IT you stupid idiot

> > Can we have that in English please?

> I'm not even sure that babelfish could translate that paragraph.

by **Andre Warring** » Fri, 24 Mar 2000 04:00:00

You allready played GP3 I suppose?

Andre

>I agree this thing is horrible. Waiting for Gp3 which will have no competion
>whatsoever this year.

>> Pahahahaha is this the gp3 killer you guys were raving about. Its exactly
>> like f1 97-99 before it. Crud. pha what a waste of time, clock cycles, data
>> etc. The graphics are show and shit, the tracks are from another dimention
>> the sound is from the mega drive. Sheeesh I not even going to burn this one
>> for the sake of it.

by **David L. Co** » Fri, 24 Mar 2000 04:00:00

I just watched the German Gamestar Mpeg for GP3 again, and I have to say
now that I've seen F1 2000, the lack of TCP/IP in GP3 means less to me
than it did before.

Seeing how much fun I can have offline with AI in NFS5 (I'll buy this
one) has given me new hope for GP3 - At least until WSC comes out. That
will certainly be the multiplayer's dream. At least as fun as GPL since
we know that Alison is assisting with the online development.

The West's have sure built up some huge expectations for WSC. Do you
think they will live up to RAS' high standards? Nobody has even
considered the possibility that WSC will not deliver. It surely does not
look like it will fail based on all the input we've had. But we had
input for F1 2000 (not nearly as much though) - look at what it turned
out to be...

--David Cook

wrote...

> You allready played GP3 I suppose?

> Andre

> >I agree this thing is horrible. Waiting for Gp3 which will have no competion
> >whatsoever this year.

> >> Pahahahaha is this the gp3 killer you guys were raving about. Its exactly
> >> like f1 97-99 before it. Crud. pha what a waste of time, clock cycles, data
> >> etc. The graphics are show and shit, the tracks are from another dimention
> >> the sound is from the mega drive. Sheeesh I not even going to burn this one
> >> for the sake of it.

by **Scott B. Huste** » Fri, 24 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Damn Brian Tate!

Throw in George Ojeda too ;)

LOL

--
Scott B. Husted
"PA-Scott"
COO
MMMGI
ICQ# 4395450

http://www.MMMGI.com
http://www.Acrotech.net
http://www.Powersims.com
http://www.InternetMotorsports.net

> > For Cliff: "But we have more OPTIONS now" ;)

> Heheheh ;-D

> That has clearly taken the vocabulary of the online Nascar community. You
> know your a simracing freak when in real life you have either said "but
you
> have more OPTIONS now (with the optional <vbg>)" or "gamulationT" ;-D

> Must be Brian's fault!

> --
> -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> -- May the Downforce be with you...
> -- http://www.WeRace.net
> -- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't
realise
> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.

by **Olav K. Malm** » Fri, 24 Mar 2000 04:00:00

That thought have struck me too. What if WSC fails to deliver? The only place
I can see that it will not deliver might be that it may require a monster
PC. But then again, the West's said in a chat earlier this year that they
develop it on a PIII450, and they sure aren't satisfied with a bad framerate,
thinking it will work better in the future.

The reason I look forward to WSC is that what the West's have said about
details in the physic tells me that they are the first since Papy to take
this issue really serious. Physics first and then gameplay will come for
free as a result of that. I feel that everything else is gameplay first and
then try to make it look realistic. IMHO of course.

But again, you never know, they might crash and burn because they have fed
the sim community with enourmous expectations. I hope not.

--
Olav K. Malmin
remove spam when replying

by **Bern** » Fri, 24 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Yer at the melbourne gp mate and that january build kicked this games arse!

> You allready played GP3 I suppose?

> Andre

> >I agree this thing is horrible. Waiting for Gp3 which will have no
competion
> >whatsoever this year.

> >> Pahahahaha is this the gp3 killer you guys were raving about. Its
exactly
> >> like f1 97-99 before it. Crud. pha what a waste of time, clock cycles,
data
> >> etc. The graphics are show and shit, the tracks are from another
dimention
> >> the sound is from the mega drive. Sheeesh I not even going to burn this
one
> >> for the sake of it.

by **Andre Warrin** » Fri, 24 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Since the GPaL story, I won't believe anything anymore untill I saw
and tested it myself...

Andre

>That thought have struck me too. What if WSC fails to deliver? The only place
>I can see that it will not deliver might be that it may require a monster
>PC. But then again, the West's said in a chat earlier this year that they
>develop it on a PIII450, and they sure aren't satisfied with a bad framerate,
>thinking it will work better in the future.

>The reason I look forward to WSC is that what the West's have said about
>details in the physic tells me that they are the first since Papy to take
>this issue really serious. Physics first and then gameplay will come for
>free as a result of that. I feel that everything else is gameplay first and
>then try to make it look realistic. IMHO of course.

>But again, you never know, they might crash and burn because they have fed
>the sim community with enourmous expectations. I hope not.

>--
>Olav K. Malmin
>remove spam when replying

by **Outshin** » Fri, 24 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Or you could call it "crapped out vision" <g>
--

Scott aka Outshynd
The driver formerly know as Outshined
"33" in N3
27 in NL

rec.autos.simulators

f12000 = shit

f12000 = shit

f12000 = shit

f12000 = shit

f12000 = shit

f12000 = shit

f12000 = shit

f12000 = shit

f12000 = shit