rec.autos.simulators

I need 30fps in N1999, pleeeeease!!!!

Anthony Guevarr

I need 30fps in N1999, pleeeeease!!!!

by Anthony Guevarr » Mon, 01 Mar 1999 04:00:00

Yeah, yeah. I know. I know. The Rush is definitely not kosher. The card's
ancient, but I wanted a 2D/3D combo at the time (I only had a Cirrus Logic)
and the Rush seemed like a good bet, without having to shell out the $$$
for two different cards. For now though, it's all I got. I just figured that
a game that lists a 166+, 32Mb of RAM and a 3D accelerator as its
"Recommended" setup would let my 233MMX, 64Mb of RAM and Rush
run at full detail. Wrong.

BTW, I plopped in a borrowed Diamond Stealth II (4Mb) and it ran even worse.
Funny thing is, when I set auto framerate on and the game hit that
threshold, it
would hang...cold. Never had that with the Rush.

I've finally resolved to run the game in software only. That way, I can get
full detail
at 640x480 *and* 30 fps. Isn't a 3D accelerator like the Rendition or 3Dfx
supposed
to *increase* framerates, as well as improve the quality of the polygons?!?
Guess
I'm wrong, again!

Anthony



>>>So I seriously suggest that he lose the 3dfx
>>>card.

>>Huh?

>The original poster should lose his 3dfx card. It is a RUSH
>card.

>--

>Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.

>cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com

Anthony Guevarr

I need 30fps in N1999, pleeeeease!!!!

by Anthony Guevarr » Mon, 01 Mar 1999 04:00:00

UnREM the FRAMERATE line in your N1999.PRF file.
Only works for the DOS .EXEs only.

Anthony





>Hate to ask, but how does one read fps in N1999?

>>> i never got less than 28 fps, for a very brif moment a bristol and 30
fps
>>>at every other track and almost all of bristol.  Must be the rush
card...get a
>>>rendition v20 or banshee

>>Apparently, you're not using the settings the original poster was using.

>>A 166/VoodooII, in N1999, will not do what you describe, if you are
>>set to view 20 cars ahead and 10 behind, as he was.

Anthony Guevarr

I need 30fps in N1999, pleeeeease!!!!

by Anthony Guevarr » Mon, 01 Mar 1999 04:00:00


>If you really only have a p5-166, then yes you are obviously being
>unrealistic. IMHO :-)

Actually, it's a P233MMX, but I get the idea  : )
Upgrade time, James.

Anthony

Greg Cisk

I need 30fps in N1999, pleeeeease!!!!

by Greg Cisk » Tue, 02 Mar 1999 04:00:00


>>So I seriously suggest that he lose the 3dfx
>>card.

>Huh?

The original poster should lose his 3dfx card. It is a RUSH
card.

--

Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.

cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com

AKH

I need 30fps in N1999, pleeeeease!!!!

by AKH » Tue, 02 Mar 1999 04:00:00

I can't speak for absolute certain about the RUSH. I have a BANSHEE.
Before that I had a Diamond Stealth II S220. Before that an Intergraph
Reactor. You should see faster framerates with the Diamond Stealth in 3D
than regular sotware. As a matter of fact.... Even the Reactor whould be
better than software mode. And none of them locked up with the game once
all was properly configured. I think something is wrong somewhere else.
The 233 should do fine. I even had a K6 233 and N2 was fine on it. maybe
someone can weigh in...

Alan

> BTW, I plopped in a borrowed Diamond Stealth II (4Mb) and it ran even worse.
> Funny thing is, when I set auto framerate on and the game hit that
> threshold, it
> would hang...cold. Never had that with the Rush.

> I've finally resolved to run the game in software only. That way, I can get
> full detail
> at 640x480 *and* 30 fps. Isn't a 3D accelerator like the Rendition or 3Dfx
> supposed
> to *increase* framerates, as well as improve the quality of the polygons?!?
> Guess
> I'm wrong, again!

> Anthony



> >>>So I seriously suggest that he lose the 3dfx
> >>>card.

> >>Huh?

> >The original poster should lose his 3dfx card. It is a RUSH
> >card.

> >--

> >Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.

> >cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com

speedrace

I need 30fps in N1999, pleeeeease!!!!

by speedrace » Tue, 02 Mar 1999 04:00:00

oops, sorry.  I still say it will run faster in generic mode for him.


>>>So I seriously suggest that he lose the 3dfx
>>>card.

>>Huh?

>The original poster should lose his 3dfx card. It is a RUSH
>card.

>--

>Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.

>cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.