rec.autos.simulators

!!!!F1RS: OOOOooooooh !!!!WOW!!!!

'John' Joao Sil

!!!!F1RS: OOOOooooooh !!!!WOW!!!!

by 'John' Joao Sil » Wed, 06 Jan 1999 04:00:00

I think in the U.S. top speed is limited by engine electronics at least
on some cars. I once managed to get my stock U.S. ~100HP '90 Honda Civic Si
up to 124mph on a long downhill mountain highway but I remember at the
time hearing that the there was a limiter on the engine that made 120mph
the top speed the downhill added the 4mph maybe in a hurricane I could
have made 130mph :-)

Perhaps European vehicles lack these artificial limits since in Europe
they don't have the ridiculous driving laws of the U.S. (speaking as
an American who lived in Germany for 2 years and loved the driving
laws there)

Seeyas on the track.

--John (Joao) Silva



>That must be some 626.  In the US, the 164 hp model was tested at 128 mph by
>Road&Track.  I suspect that 135 is highly optimistic.  Further, getting that
>extra 15 mph would require increasing hp by another third.

>Okay, I went back and tested some of the Gran Tursimo cars.  Here's how they
>rated compared to R&T tests:

>                          Gran Turismo   R&T test
>Integra GSR              158              134
>'94 Prelude VTEC      164              137
>gen1 Miata                147              121

>As I previously mentioned, GT is way optimistic.  The Lude was listed as 205
>hp instead of 190, otherwise, the game hp's matched the real hp's within one.  
>To reach 164, a real Lude would require about 300 hp.

David Mast

!!!!F1RS: OOOOooooooh !!!!WOW!!!!

by David Mast » Wed, 06 Jan 1999 04:00:00




>>Here's the problem with the internet, write a short post where you don't
>>explain everything and someone will invariably come up with the oddball case
>>that is the exception.

>Hardly "the oddball case", it's pretty normal. Only in the U.S. does
>"horsepower=speed", in the rest of the world weight and lower drag are
>equally or more important.

Are you saying that weight has a major role on top speed?  Please explain.  I
think it is rather small, though yes, a factor.  

Certainly drag is a very important term. Going back to the original reply's
car, a Mazda 626 2.0 Si (did I get that right)?  Do you know how much the
frontal area * Cd might be lowered compared to the US variant?  I can't
imagine enough to make it anywhere near a  150/150 car.  Can you name "real
world" (includes Europe :-)) cars that make 150 mph with only 150 hp?

I don't mean this as a beat-a-dead-horse issue, just wondering how much of a
factor that might be.  As an aside, yes, I've driven in Europe.  Quite enjoyed
the cars there being into smaller cars myself.

Interesting.  I'd like to know more of these inside stories.  Remember, this
whole things started with someone claiming GT handily had the best physics out
there, (GPL included if I recall), to which I replied that I thought not.

Ah, but you are.

Was this addressed to me, or just a general observation?  My last two cars
have been Hondas.  Before that a Dodge-badged Mitsubishi, and a German
Ford.  Honda is over-rated in hp in the game.  Yet, I buy, race and enjoy the
Hondas.  If anything, I want them to add European cars to the game.  So, if
you meant to apply the above to me, you must have done some creative
observing.

My observation?  Everyone is more willing to ascribe behaviors to "them" that
don't apply to "us".  

Porsches, Ferrari's, etc are just as desired here, if not more, than in
Europe.  We don't have as wide a variety of cars, so yes, maybe we tend to
dismiss what we don't know (Citroen, Peugot disappeared from the US market
years ago, as did Fiat).  And certainly there are the "Ford guys" and "Chevy
guys" who swear by their brands.  But I'd say there is as strong a bias
here (sad to say) that says "american = junk".

I was in the UK about a month ago.  Picked up a couple of car mags to burn
some coins (Car, Autocar).  Not very surprised to see the Elise and TVR's held
in such high esteem.  Got quite a kick out of the panning they gave the
Corvette.

What do I want next?  An Elise!

regards,
Dave

John Walla

!!!!F1RS: OOOOooooooh !!!!WOW!!!!

by John Walla » Wed, 06 Jan 1999 04:00:00



>I think in the U.S. top speed is limited by engine electronics at least
>on some cars.

It's also limited by a lot of the emission controls and additonal
electronic gizmos required for the U.S. market - standard air-con and
such like. The U.S. spec BMW M3-Evo is noticably down on power from
it's Euro counterpart for this reason. Then again, all cars in Japan
are legally limited to a maximum of 280hp and 112mph so if we're
talking about GT it obviously doesn't take that into account.

Cheers!
John

John Walla

!!!!F1RS: OOOOooooooh !!!!WOW!!!!

by John Walla » Wed, 06 Jan 1999 04:00:00



>Certainly drag is a very important term. Going back to the original reply's
>car, a Mazda 626 2.0 Si (did I get that right)?  Do you know how much the
>frontal area * Cd might be lowered compared to the US variant?  I can't
>imagine enough to make it anywhere near a  150/150 car.  Can you name "real
>world" (includes Europe :-)) cars that make 150 mph with only 150 hp?

The Rocket, the Caterham Super-7? From the top of my head I'm not
sure, and since I know everyone's gonna slip on their anoraks and get
the reference books out I'm not going to take a flyer on it :-)

Well, the Diablo is bigger than a Ford Transit van but I know what you
mean! It's just different I suppose. I like driving in the U.S.
because it's sometimes good to drive something as big as a barge on a
road that's like the front straight at Indy! Coming from Scotland
where the "main road" to go to the highlands is a massively congested
two lane affair that looks like a road through residential housing in
the U.S. it's a nice change!

Somewhere in the house I have an interview with the designer where
people asked about some of the foibles and inconsistencies of GT and
he explained where they came from. Certainly from his description of
the physics of GT I know it's not as "good" (meaning "complete") as
GPL but then the "physics" of a sim is only a means to an end - how to
get it to "feel" real when driving - and GT accomplishes that very
well. It's also pretty clear from the interview that he played fast
and loose with the parameters sometimes depending upon his preferences
or what gameplay required, which is something a sim shouldn't really
do (or only to a lesser extent).

I know it looks like it but honestly I wasn't :-)  It's just something
I've observed many times. I think that coming from a small country
like Scotland we get used to not being the best at something, whereas
people from the U.S. tend to think the opposite.

Not even slightly related to you - sorry if I implied it. We both
drive Hondas, so that's something in common! My last cars have been
Honda, Volvo, Peugot & BMW.

So the world is less self-analytical than outwardly critical. No
surprise there.

There's no doubt Europeans are as biased in their own way. There is a
belief here that American cars are big, powerful and handle like a
tractor. European cars are biased toward poise and roadholding, which
is why cars like the Elise are given such respect.

You wouldn't go far wrong - it is a really nice car as long as you
don't want to drag-race too many Corvettes!

Cheers!
John

Madhatte

!!!!F1RS: OOOOooooooh !!!!WOW!!!!

by Madhatte » Sun, 10 Jan 1999 04:00:00

well said...nimble but fast...not exactly and american concept, 'car' LOVES
the viper too, haha.
having said that I think i can see the american appeal. big, fat, loud, and
brute...they still come up
with the coolest cars to look at. the viper is unreal, and panoz builds some
***in corkers...
the good old gtr which pretty much burns anything made in us instead looks
like a ***y aunties-car...

I still believe that the physics in gt set the standard , certain play
mechanics excluded. Gpl feels a little
plasticy, and artificial. I mean in certain situations you can feel certain
gyroscopic forces pulling vectors around.
gt does that too but only on spastic set-ups.

David Masten schrieb in Nachricht

....


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.