So, it *is* a lot slower than the download, but I guess
it's still probably faster than a regular modem??
Thanks for the corrections.
- Mike.
============================================
Mike Holthouse - Indianapolis, IN
Drop the "X" to e-mail me.
============================================
The article said that you could download the entire library of congress in
less than 1 second!!
I guess at that speed, some downloads would be on your computer before the
screen could refresh!!
doktorB
>> 2-way over the cable. No phone line is used.
>Hmmm... I wonder where I read my info... I better look
>into them again...
>> Upstream bandwidth is only about 15% of the
>> downstream bandwidth.
>So, it *is* a lot slower than the download, but I guess
>it's still probably faster than a regular modem??
-sam
> How big is too big.
> >>Post it to a web site somewhere so we can all try it.
> >It's too big.
> What do you mean by "really" ?
> Treating people as liars ?
> You can be convinced or not, I don't care.
> I'm just relaying the info for people that can buy the magazine in
> their respectives countries : Morocco, Canada, Portugal, Swiss,
> Belgium & France and didn't expected such reactions as yours.
> I'll post the track today for people more courteous than you are.
>>Anyway, if you could spare a couple of hours uploading time
>>(assuming you don't have a cable modem like some lucky
>>people)
>Off topic, but of interest to cable modem shoppers - they're
>only fast one way (downloading). You upload files (and send
>your "clicks" and keystrokes) through your regular phone
>line just like you do now...
> It's actually on the way to DoctorB mailbox, I think he can upload it
> somewhere for everyone fastly.
8-)
*Peter* 8-)
(NB: remove asterix to e-mail)
