rec.autos.simulators

by **John Simmon** » Thu, 03 Apr 2003 09:07:39

I took a spin on each one, and almost all fast setups exhibit a
significantly shorter 3rd and 4th gear than what is required by a
given track. The really bad tracks are Monza, Rouen, Mexico, and
Kyalami. Each one required a change down from 4.xx to to a 3.50-3.60
4th gear, as well as matching changes in 3rd (and someotimes second)
gear.

Other than that, the setups are quite driveable.

by **John Simmon** » Sat, 05 Apr 2003 07:35:10

> >I took a spin on each one, and almost all fast setups exhibit a
> >significantly shorter 3rd and 4th gear than what is required by a
> >given track. The really bad tracks are Monza, Rouen, Mexico, and
> >Kyalami. Each one required a change down from 4.xx to to a 3.50-3.60
> >4th gear, as well as matching changes in 3rd (and someotimes second)
> >gear.

> >Other than that, the setups are quite driveable.

> Did you get the GPL tracks running in Nascar?

> If so, how?

Yeah, I still have 2k2 installed, so I just converted the tracks, and
then copied them over to my NR2K3 track foler, and they work.

rec.autos.simulators

RASCAR: GPL Tracks

RASCAR: GPL Tracks

RASCAR: GPL Tracks