>> > I can't understand all this talk about being robbed by Microprose. I
>> > personnally think that GP2 is a top notch simulation of F1, at least
>> > from what I see on TV on real races.
>> > I'm not a computer game fan, I'm a F1 fan and from that angle, GP2 is
>> > top notch.
>> > I feel the game is very very very challenging. Sure, If you look for
>> > "bugs" long enough, you'll find some in every computer program.
>> > I'm getting more pleasure from GP2 than the money I paid for it.
>> > Sure, there are a few things I'd like to see improved in a future
>> > version, but the present version is a very good one.
>> > Congratulations to MicroProse and all the programmers involved in the
>> > making of GP2.
>> > --
>> > Claude Marcil,
>> > Boisbriand,
>> > Quebec, Canada,
>> > Autour du globe sur le NET.
>> > Around the globe on the NET.
>> Congrats ???
>> Come ON !!
>> Did u say the same thing when OS2 fell into oblivion ?
>> Here's my point - If you had a choice of another F1 sim in the market
>> that runs w/ all the settings THATS offered in the game with a resonable
>> computer(say a P133 Intel, 32Meg EDO, 2meg PCI) which would u buy if u
>> could only afford one ??
>> Here's another example - lets ignore the bugs as you mentioned.
>> What about customer service thats EXPECTED from paying for software ???
>> I have repeatedly sent e-mail to their site(MPS) for support the past 4
>> months and got back ZERO replys.
>> Heres another fact:
>> I have a P200Intel on an ASUS board, 4 meg of video fast
>> ram(Mystique),64meg of EDO ram.
>> I'm sure that most people reading this post would agree that its one of
>> the stronger systems available to date.
>> Why then do I still have to turn off the sky and texture in the mirrors
>> ???
>> To put this into another perspective, a car that u purchased and found
>> out that it could not do what it claimed on paper -would u not bring the
>> car back to the dealership to have it checked out ??
>> WHen something is offered thats not really there in the car biz, thats
>> usually called a SCAM.
>> With GP2, the consumer was led to believe that the features that the
>> game offered in the options should work resonably well w/ a mid priced
>> computer. WHY is that the game w/ all the processing power that I have
>> still requires me to turn the details down ??
>> I have read here that some people here are willing to wait till the next
>> generation of processors come out for GP2 - why ??? - If this is the
>> case just play GP1 instead - NOT.
>> It seems you can live w/ paying that kinda of cash for SCAM software
>> thats not supported by it programers. Hmmmm... could I sell u some
>> beautiful prime property down in the Everglades ?? ;-)
>> Fire away - I got my helmet and nomax suit on.
>> Jude R.
>> 1996 AC Cobra(425hp)
>> 1995 SHO(225hp)
>> 1997 Windstar(It carries the kids and the spare parts)
>You can take your helmet off Jude, I couldna said it better
>myself!
>Bravo!
>(as usual) -DG-
Sorry for the long post, but you all shoud read.
Fellow Claude doesn't understand all this talking about GP2; all
those complaints? It's not that difficult... Just to make it simpler
let's pretend it's pretty enjoyable be fooled by several
adverti***ts, by the owner's manual, and so now stop discussing if
having many bugs makes of a game a real shit.
There is people that accepts bugs and people that doesn't. If you have
the choice of course it's better that a softer is bug free; after
all, bugs are malfunctions and you won't see any adverti***ts of any
kind, of any product confessing that a product has this or that
malfuncion, though it's clear to anyone that bugs are somewhat
inherent and so should be accepted sometimes.
It's not merelly a money question but of respect, of being normaly
honest. Just the same when programmers want us to respect their
intelectual property and so not to pirate.
You say you're not a sim fan and enjoy GP2 despite all bugs. Me and
other people say we don't like bugs. Put it this way it's just a
matter of taste and we have nothing more to talk of.
However, if you go to buy anything and give less money than it's the
price to pay, you simply don't take the product with you. So it's the
law in any country.
Also, you cannot sell anything different than what is said it to be.
In this second case, all is just theory. After you buy a product
you'll mostly have to deal with its problems and with the missing
promised support and garantee. In almost all cases, your money was
the first thing gone. Second to go is your time, your enjoy and your
patience.
Even those of you living in first world coutries just can pay
attention to the fact of everyday products (or services) getting
broken around you. It can be just small things, but it happens all the
time. And you have payed the price asked for all of them. So consumers
rights is still missing, everywhere in the world.
The problem with GP2 is the promised support and the adverti***t
made about it. Among other things as, for exemple, not sending a
promised owner's manual in other language, in by you just sending a
letter-request as instructed by Microprose. You can send as many as
you want: there will be no answer at all. Try it ! Just make an
experience...
You need nothing more than just common sense to notice that -- despite
having good features and qualities -- the game has been released with
even more bugs than GP1, with a level of difficulty of not use, with a
waste of processing just making the behavior away from reality (as
several cheatings by the computer controlled cars); suiting only
processors that will come in a day in the future (when it had
released the GP3 yet) and other things people is complaining around.
I don't know exactly what has gone on the heads of people at
Microprose when they released the game.
But I'm pretty sure that the people complaining against them would
never desire to be responsible for the release of a game told been
tested and holding such amount of defects. In other words: a beta as
final version.
Regards.
Fernando Assis.