I MADE IN MONZA 1.23.548.
IS ANYBODY WITH BETTER TIME??
I MADE IN MONZA 1.23.548.
IS ANYBODY WITH BETTER TIME??
Gradully getting down. 1.23.548 on Monday (co-incidence), 1:23.298
yesterday. F7 only.
BTW, it helps if you say what aids you use.
--
Suck The Goat
I made 1:21.990 and others have done it even better than that.
> I MADE IN MONZA 1.23.548.
> IS ANYBODY WITH BETTER TIME??
>> I MADE IN MONZA 1.23.548.
>> IS ANYBODY WITH BETTER TIME??
>Go to 'www.mal.com/~dgymer/gp2/hof2' and look for yourself...
>My fastest is 1.21.9xx, but 1.20.xxx times have been made.
Josh
Please post this so we can see it Id love to see how its done!!!
Eric
Josh
My time: 1.21.789
The best time i saw in the Internet: about 1.20.4??
(I cant believe)
Herbert
1.22.876
-Fede
> >Subject: Re: MONZA 1.23.548
> >Date: 12 Sep 96 01:52:21 -0700
> >Please post this so we can see it Id love to see how its done!!!
> >Eric
> I don't think you'll see any posts of replays until the results of the contest
> come in and it's over and done with.
> Josh
*****************************
http://users.hol.gr/~maitre/
*****************************
As being a big fan of F1, that's right John Wallace! ; ), before getting into
NASCAR, I have managed a 1:22.xxx within three days of serious learning and
setting up a car for Monza. I am still learning though. It will probably take as
long or longer to learn how to setup a car, like I did for NASCAR and Indycar
II.
If those of you wondering my top speed, it's 331 kph.
Now, this is with a Gravis Analogue Joystick and "Auto Shift", and no other help
aids!! I know there is faster people out there, but for three days..come on
now..Give me some credit.
I would like to thank all the people who has helped me out for their "ideals" on
setting up a car for GP2.
I agree with John on the theories on the "Dampener" settings..Makes sense. I
have tried other ways that people have suggested, and the car was unstable in
the turns. I had more "leverage or traction" using the methods by John.
I have also downloaded "bigger"***pits and have noticed a "lower" processor
occupancy rating.
What is so strange is that, when I add more graphic details, my braking
distances get longer. Which means, I have to brake earlier than usual. Any
comments on experiences on this??
Not bad for a "roundy-roundy" boy, huh, J. Wallace??; ) I am looking forward to
the September's SRN issue..
There's one road course for ya!!;) More on the way..hehehe
take care all...
Julian Data #0004
Director of Information Technology, Consultant, "Ace" Test Driver
Offical Channel Operator (#ivgacsnc, on undernet)
International Video Gamers Assoiciation, Inc. (IVGA)
14100 Walsingham Avenue
Suite 36
Largo, FL 34644
Voice: (813) 596-6661
On Tue, 10 Sep 1996 23:34:52 +0300, Hadzigiannakis Kostas
You also have the logged data here...
Pody
begin 644 122641k.pal
<uuencoded_portion_removed>
$;5Z6:6$*
`
end
There must be a 1000 WWW-sites with these kind of hotlaps on it.....Look for
them there; this is not a binaries group.
Jo
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The most civilized civilizations are as close to barba-
rism as polished iron is to rust.
Rivarol
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>1.22.641 with keyboard.
>You also have the logged data here...
All replies must be sent here or to
E-mail.