performance at portland, and asked them if they have reduced so much down
force in the cars that they no longer can race in the rain?
Maybe they need to reduce speeds by putting so much down force in the cars
that the can't get up to speed with the current engine package. At the very
least the cars would once again stick to the track.
With reduced down force we now have the ability of the cars to go extreemly
fast down the straights with no downforce to stop the cars properly at the
end of the straights in the wet, and very little or no down force to keep
the cars on the medium to slow speed turns when wet.
I'll be at Cleveland in a few days, and I sure hope it is dry, otherwise I
might be watching a parade led by the pace car.
> Hi,
> Say my first Wet Cart race in a looooong time. I posted a stupid
> question some time ago about CART racing in the rain and got a few
> (justified) riled folks irritated by my questions about wet racing on
> ovals...
> anyway, anybody want to comment on the mayhem yesterday at Portland?
> The first 30 laps were chaos. I couldn't believe how hard it was for
> those guys to keep the car under control. Shows you how F1 has
> watered down things with all the driver aids :(
> I never liked Paul Tracy that much and last night I was disappointed
> in his pit stop antics. I know its raining and that the grip in the
> pits was lousy, but *everybody* had to exercise a little bit more
> caution. Poor Bruno Junqueira.
> I watched the coverage on ESPN and the race ended midnight local time
> for me. I don't know if there was any other interviews / stuff after
> the race as I would like to hear more of the driver's comments.
> Enjoyed Fittipaldi's performance, though. Also, does Castroneves have
> the record for most pitstops in one race? Any other views on the
> race?
> Regards