rec.autos.simulators

by **Patrick Shuma** » Sun, 29 Nov 1998 04:00:00

Personally I fell that the reconfigured Sears Point is easier, but the old
configuration was more fun due to the extra challenge from the carousel and
turn 7.

Thank Y'all,

Patrick Shumar

by **Johnny** » Sun, 29 Nov 1998 04:00:00

Well, with only 3 laps in, prob not the best opinion, but I am kinda mixed
like I think you are. Sears sure is easier, but I do miss the challenge of
carousel and turn 7. All i know is I coulda done without this game if it
meant any earlier release of nascar2000. Ive ran all the new tracks and new
config's at least once...spent an hour or so at Homestead, Pikes Peak,
vegas, and Portland tweaking setups, but always end up putting GPL or Viper
back in the drive and doing some REAL racing! 8~) HURRY UP
N2000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! These 2d physics BLOW!!!! Cant tell you
enuff what a let down it was hitting the first "invisible curbs" in Nascar
1999 with no reaction at all from the car.In fact...what am I doing typing
this...where is my GPL CD?? LOL
JT

by **George Lew** » Sun, 29 Nov 1998 04:00:00

Every now and then, I missed that hairpin and crashed. Glad it's
gone! grin. but yeah, the older one was more challenging and made it
more fun.

>Personally I fell that the reconfigured Sears Point is easier, but the old
>configuration was more fun due to the extra challenge from the carousel and
>turn 7.

>Thank Y'all,

>Patrick Shumar

Remove the -nospam- from the email address. Sorry, I *had* to put it in.
I'm receiving more junk mail than ever now.

by **Tom Store** » Sun, 29 Nov 1998 04:00:00

They are both challenging courses, but if we ask nicely maybe we could get
one of the Internet groups to make a conversion for Sears Point N2 to
NR1999. Would anyone care to see that?

Tom

>Every now and then, I missed that hairpin and crashed. Glad it's
>gone! grin. but yeah, the older one was more challenging and made it
>more fun.

>>Personally I fell that the reconfigured Sears Point is easier, but the old
>>configuration was more fun due to the extra challenge from the carousel
and
>>turn 7.

>>Thank Y'all,

>>Patrick Shumar

>Remove the -nospam- from the email address. Sorry, I *had* to put it in.
>I'm receiving more junk mail than ever now.

by **George Lew** » Sun, 29 Nov 1998 04:00:00

I'm sure all you'd have to do is rename the file and folder and stuff
it in there...

>They are both challenging courses, but if we ask nicely maybe we could get
>one of the Internet groups to make a conversion for Sears Point N2 to
>NR1999. Would anyone care to see that?

>Tom

>>Every now and then, I missed that hairpin and crashed. Glad it's
>>gone! grin. but yeah, the older one was more challenging and made it
>>more fun.

>>>Personally I fell that the reconfigured Sears Point is easier, but the old
>>>configuration was more fun due to the extra challenge from the carousel
>and
>>>turn 7.

>>>Thank Y'all,

>>>Patrick Shumar

>>Remove the -nospam- from the email address. Sorry, I *had* to put it in.
>>I'm receiving more junk mail than ever now.

by **Tom Store** » Sun, 29 Nov 1998 04:00:00

Well its the same as Pocono, it needs to be converted to NR1999. Plus while
they work on that I'm sure they could change the name for us. Hint! Hint!
Hint!
The new one takes some getting use to, but I liked the carousel too.

Tom

rec.autos.simulators

Which Sears Point is better, N2 or NR1999?

Which Sears Point is better, N2 or NR1999?

Which Sears Point is better, N2 or NR1999?

Which Sears Point is better, N2 or NR1999?

Which Sears Point is better, N2 or NR1999?

Which Sears Point is better, N2 or NR1999?

Which Sears Point is better, N2 or NR1999?