>> I'm not riled - I just got slightly irritated at the implication
>> that the MX was a *bad* card.
> it's getting stone age fast. the GF2 series lacks the DX8 features
> (ie. vertex and pixel shaders) and shouldn't even, imho, be
> considered for a "serious" *** setup these days. a GF3ti200 is
> a lot better choice, and not much more expensive.
A GF3 is about 100 more here - that's a *lot* to me. Anyhow, remember
I've only just upgraded from a Voodoo 3 PCI - after that, *any* GeForce
card looks very fast!
--
"After all, a mere thousand yards... such a harmless little knoll,
really" - Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh.
The GPL Scrapyard: bits 'n' bobs at http://www.racesimcentral.net/