rec.autos.simulators

F12K - wait for GP3 instead

John McIlro

F12K - wait for GP3 instead

by John McIlro » Sun, 26 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Thought I'd throw my ha'penny's worth into the discussion. From a couple of
days' solid playing at F12K, I'm going back to Monaco Racing Simulation - at
least until Geoff Crammond's next work appears.
F12K's graphics are slow at anything approaching a decent detail level (PIII
500 w/256Mb RAM and 12Mb Voodoo 2) and I'm not at all convinced about the
physics engine, to say nothing of the AI.

John

GraDe

F12K - wait for GP3 instead

by GraDe » Sun, 26 Mar 2000 04:00:00

Its not groud breaking stuff I suppose but like I said before, as much as I
said it would be no god being an A racing title, I'm very impressed.

To me its similar to MGPRS2 but with some its cleaned up to be honest. Very
nice. Won't stop me bing first in line for GP3 though.

Anyone seen www.simracingnwes.com today?
Jason Murray is putting his backing behind it for a league, thats the sign
of a sim to be racing :-)

Now, How the ***y heck do you get under 1.28 at Interlagos....hehe


Ronald Bree

F12K - wait for GP3 instead

by Ronald Bree » Sun, 26 Mar 2000 04:00:00

F1 2000 has its problems but F1RS physics are the worst.  The under steerand the
throttle is horrible.  I tried it for a good 2 weeks and uninstalled it because
I couldn't get past the throttle physics.  IF you rev it up to say 8000 RPM in
neutral then put in 1st gear without changing your throttle position it will
redline, second gear the same.  A car doesn't increase fuel flow when you put it
in gear.  Its like the amount of fuel is more depended on gear not peddle
position.  People can't actually think this is the way a car behaves.

> Thought I'd throw my ha'penny's worth into the discussion. From a couple of
> days' solid playing at F12K, I'm going back to Monaco Racing Simulation - at
> least until Geoff Crammond's next work appears.
> F12K's graphics are slow at anything approaching a decent detail level (PIII
> 500 w/256Mb RAM and 12Mb Voodoo 2) and I'm not at all convinced about the
> physics engine, to say nothing of the AI.

> John

Michael E. Carve

F12K - wait for GP3 instead

by Michael E. Carve » Sun, 26 Mar 2000 04:00:00


% F1 2000 has its problems but F1RS physics are the worst.  The under steerand the
% throttle is horrible.  I tried it for a good 2 weeks and uninstalled it because
% I couldn't get past the throttle physics.  IF you rev it up to say 8000 RPM in
% neutral then put in 1st gear without changing your throttle position it will
% redline, second gear the same.  A car doesn't increase fuel flow when you put it
% in gear.  Its like the amount of fuel is more depended on gear not peddle
% position.  People can't actually think this is the way a car behaves.

Hmmmmmm.... Current F1 cars have so much electronic control, I wonder if
this is something that actually does happen in the magic black boxes?

Or is was a kludge on the programmers part due to the lack of a
clutch....

Or as you say, it was just sucky programming...

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.