rec.autos.simulators

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

Mitch_

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

by Mitch_ » Tue, 08 Apr 2003 10:52:17

What exactly does it prove Marc?  In his case (which seems is the exception
not the rule) he ruled out many s/w issues in a single swipe.  Yes his
problems still exists but now we know its liklely hardware related or
possibly a bios issue not likely a OS/driver issue.  My point was not to
argue this case specifically but to say that a clean re-install is quite
often necessary in the trouble shooting process.  Go ahead argue all you
like Mr Expert... <<<-- MUTED


> The word is "moot" and the fact that the problem remains proves my point
> nicely.

> Marc



> > In certain situations a windows re-install can be done much faster than
> > tracking down whats causing the root issue.  And you get the added
benefit
> > of knowing you are starting clean.   I know for certain I can have a
> squeaky
> > clean install of XP in 2 hours.  You are not giving any guarantees that
> you
> > could do similar using the standard troubleshooting process.

> > As Morris said he's already done a clean install and the issue still
> remains
> > so your point is mute..



> > > I wish people would quit telling others to reformat their hard drives
> and
> > do
> > > a fresh install of Windows to get video drivers to work better--it's
> > > complete horse shit and a huge time consumer.

> > > I guess I hadn't said it enough times to help you.

> > > If you had searched here, you also would have found threads where I
> > > discussed my installation of a Radeon 9700 Pro and how it gave the
same
> or
> > > lower fps as a GeForce 4.  However, you can run anti-aliasing and
other
> > > goodies with no fps hit on the Radeon where it will kill the fps on a
> > > GeForce 4.  Lesson: if your FPS is low to start with, likely because
CPU
> > > power is lacking, the Radeon won't help to boost it.

> > > The Radeon and the GeForce 4 should not be affected much by resolution
> or
> > > colour depth.

> > > Older cards would crumple under the strain of 32 bit colour or 1600 x
> 1200
> > > resolution.

> > > There are about 25 control panel settings that will adjust fps in a
game
> > and
> > > there are about 30 settings in NR2003 that will affect NR2003.  List
> EVERY
> > > single option choice in the game and in Windows Display settings and
> > several
> > > of us here may be able to help you to either adjust or realise that
the
> > fps
> > > you are getting is "normal" for your set-up.  Since there are about 7
> > > billion combinations and permutations, if you do not list every single
> > > setting and option then it's just guess work and you get lots of
> so-called
> > > experts telling you to wipe your system and start over--which is BS
> > advice.
> > > Anything that may be affecting the new video card negatively such as
> > > left-over ***from nVIDIA, etc., can be removed easily without wiping
> > your
> > > system.  Also, unless you installed a bunch of ***beyond the drivers
> > > themselves, it won't make a*** of difference whether you uninstall
it
> or
> > > not in XP.  XP will use the proper driver and ignore the old ones
until
> > you
> > > put the old card back in.

> > > Bottom line: you cannot build a system today that will run NR2003 with
> all
> > > the eye candy on at 32-bit 1600x1200 resolution and have a decent
frame
> > > rate.

> > > Put your GeForce 4 back in and wait for the next gen. of video cards
to
> > come
> > > along.

> > > Marc



> > > > I just don't get it, I've done everything I can,
> > > > put on a new copy of XP professional, reinstalled
> > > > everything dx9a, latest drivers for everything, FPS
> > > > still suck compared to what the Ti4600 was getting.
> > > > using the same settings.  Lost everything on the HD
> > > > to try and get this card working better, but it just
> > > > does not get it. Anyone what to buy it?  Should
> > > > have kept the Geforce FX Ultra card I had.

> > > > Under the setting for D3D in the ATI control panel
> > > > what does everyone else set the setting to.
> > > > It does not matter what resolution 1280x960x32
> > > > or 1600x1200x32 get the same FPS, start around 29 and
> > > > goes down to 20 in the trioval at most tracks. The Ti4600
> > > > never went below 29 using 4xAA, and 4anso.

> > > > is there a tweak utility like the rivetuner somewhere for ATI stuff.

> > > > Sorry for all the post about this but it is driving me crazy,
> > > > i know this card should work better than this.

> > > > The system again.
> > > > Clean install of XP pro
> > > > 1gig PC800
> > > > 2.53 P4
> > > > audigy 2
> > > > 120gig HD
> > > > momo
> > > > 9800 Pro.

Joachim Trens

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

by Joachim Trens » Tue, 08 Apr 2003 15:26:47

Could you give us a little more detail? I couldn't find anything on the net
or in Microsoft's Knowledge Base.

Thanks!

Achim


...

Joachim Trens

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

by Joachim Trens » Tue, 08 Apr 2003 15:22:18

Please give us the URL or a few more hints as to where you read it, to help
us search and find that review as well.

Thanks!

Achim


...

Don Burnett

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

by Don Burnett » Tue, 08 Apr 2003 19:30:17

While I personally have not had this bug with my system, here is the link to
it.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;815411

Don Burnette


> Could you give us a little more detail? I couldn't find anything on
> the net or in Microsoft's Knowledge Base.

> Thanks!

> Achim



>> There's a known slow-down bug with XP SP1, and a fix is available
>> from microsoft.  It's not publically available but should be easy to
>> find on the net.
> ...

Doug Elliso

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

by Doug Elliso » Tue, 08 Apr 2003 20:29:36


You're talking shite mate.

If you are changing manufacturers  - you would be stupid not to reinstall
windows to ensure you've cleared out all the old drivers.

Furthermore - this holds true for Soundcards and Motheboards

DOug

Joachim Trens

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

by Joachim Trens » Tue, 08 Apr 2003 21:29:33

Thanks Don!

Achim


Joachim Trens

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

by Joachim Trens » Tue, 08 Apr 2003 22:01:41

Hi Doug,

I don't want to endorse the way Marc expressed his thoughts and I wouldn't
want to be as categorical as him, but it's not all shite what he says
either.

I've carried the same WinME installation with me across 4 motherboards with
3 different chipsets (full AMD, AMD/Via, Nvidia nForce2), 3 different
graphics card makes (3dfx, Nvidia, ATI), 4 different soundcards (2xSBLive,
Audigy1, Audigy2), lots of different wheels and joysticks I've tested, many
software installs and deinstalls, innumerable graphics driver updates,
DirectX from I think Dx7, Dx8, Dx8.1, Dx8.1a to Dx9, other HW changes like
CD drives, different network cards, different online connections (from plain
modem to ISDN card, to ADSL card in Spain to external ADSL in Brussels using
the original Enternet, then RASPPPoE, then switching to a Router
deinstalling RASPPPoE) - I could make this list a bit longer, but it's long
enough to make my point.

I've never reinstalled until a few weeks ago (I just thought it's time to
clean up), I've always used the same installation. I've properly deinstalled
what I could, deleting the inf files, checking the Registry for remnants if
necessary, but mainly using Windows uninstaller. I've kept the Registry
clean using Ontrack's System Suite's Registry cleaner, which detects a lot
of unneeded stuff in the Registry.

When switching mobos, I've deleted the entire SystemDevice branch in
Window's DeviceManager (preferrably in SafeMode) and then cross checked with
a quick glance also in safe mode whether there's still some unwanted
hardware registered, and then I've simply installed the new mobo.

My system has always been nicely stable, and also fast. I've compared the
old install to the new one, and there is no difference in speed nor
stability. Both are stable, and equally fast.

During these 2.5 years, whenever I'd had problems and people recommended a
full reinstall, I later on found out that the problem had nothing to do with
my system not being a fresh install, but simply with the new stuff still
being buggy, because later updates usually cured the problems. Even when I
tried a quick reinstall (without reinstalling the entire environment, just
the basic system) for the Audigy1 once, I had to find out that the problems
that existed in my full install also existed in the barebone reinstall and
had nothing to do with remainders of old stuff still being in the system.

A full reinstall has never helped me, as the prob never was within my
system, but within the new stuff that didn't work properly for some reason
(admittedly, perhaps only in certain environments, but a full reinstall
didn't create such an environment either) and I am under the impression that
it also doesn't help that many others, from reading the NGs and forums.

Now, I know I've given quite a speech here and apologise for that <g> but it
simply is a topic I find interesting. Also please believe me that I am not
trying to criticise your advice in any way, but my personal experience is as
I've described above. Personally, I would suggest a reinstall only as the
very last resort, after _loads_ of other options have been tried. I'd never
suggest it early on.

Achim




> > I wish people would quit telling others to reformat their hard drives
and
> do
> > a fresh install of Windows to get video drivers to work better--it's
> > complete horse shit and a huge time consumer.

> > I guess I hadn't said it enough times to help you.

> You're talking shite mate.

> If you are changing manufacturers  - you would be stupid not to reinstall
> windows to ensure you've cleared out all the old drivers.

> Furthermore - this holds true for Soundcards and Motheboards

> DOug

Marc Collin

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

by Marc Collin » Wed, 09 Apr 2003 13:51:32

You may not endorse what I said, but I endorse what you said.  I agree with
it 100%, practise it myself, and have experienced the same results over a
similar number of hardware changes and three O/S's.  I am an IT professional
and do a substantial change and/or upgrade to my system (that happens to run
my sims) at least twice a year.

I look after a portfolio of about 250 PC's, many of which are used for
high-end CAD and 3D rendering purposes.  I have found the same thing with
them.

Sorry to be so categorical, but people who don't have a high knowledge of
computers (which is most of us) *shouldn't* be re-installing their operating
system at the drop of a hat.  I try to help people avoid problems, not
create more for themselves.  For the few who are knowledgeable out there who
choose to do this, good for you.  I am asking that you not recommend it to
others who don't have your knowledge or capability to deal with all the
consequences.

You know, I drive a fancy car and bought an after-market sport suspension
for it.  All the freaks (equivalent to us) at the fan site I belong to
laughed because I was asking around where to take the car to have the new
parts installed (dealers don't want to do it because technically the
warranty is affected, etc., etc.).  They all would have done it themselves
they said.  Just get your friends to do it with you and pay them with a case
of beer (preferably after the job was done).  Well, this is the equivalent
to what is being recommended here.  Many of those guys install turbos,
change springs, shocks, roll bars, whatever for a hobby.  They are tinkering
every weekend doing something.  I wouldn't attempt to install expensive new
springs and shocks on a brand new car myself with NONE of the correct tools
if my life depended on it.  Let them laugh.  My car runs great and it cost
me a few bucks to have it done professionally.

People who just want to use a computer and have some fun with racing sims
don't need to re-install Windows, especially to gain 1 or 2 fps.  If there
is anything more to be gained than that, then you have some other problem
with your installation that needs to be fixed independently.  And erasing
your computer as a way to fix it is stupid and short-sighted, because if you
allowed the botch-up to occur in the first place (unknowingly), you will do
it again.  Instead, either leave well enough alone or do what Joachim has
done and learn how to properly maintain your system.

</speech off>

Marc


> Hi Doug,

> I don't want to endorse the way Marc expressed his thoughts and I wouldn't
> want to be as categorical as him, but it's not all shite what he says
> either.

> I've carried the same WinME installation with me across 4 motherboards
with
> 3 different chipsets (full AMD, AMD/Via, Nvidia nForce2), 3 different
> graphics card makes (3dfx, Nvidia, ATI), 4 different soundcards (2xSBLive,
> Audigy1, Audigy2), lots of different wheels and joysticks I've tested,
many
> software installs and deinstalls, innumerable graphics driver updates,
> DirectX from I think Dx7, Dx8, Dx8.1, Dx8.1a to Dx9, other HW changes like
> CD drives, different network cards, different online connections (from
plain
> modem to ISDN card, to ADSL card in Spain to external ADSL in Brussels
using
> the original Enternet, then RASPPPoE, then switching to a Router
> deinstalling RASPPPoE) - I could make this list a bit longer, but it's
long
> enough to make my point.

> I've never reinstalled until a few weeks ago (I just thought it's time to
> clean up), I've always used the same installation. I've properly
deinstalled
> what I could, deleting the inf files, checking the Registry for remnants
if
> necessary, but mainly using Windows uninstaller. I've kept the Registry
> clean using Ontrack's System Suite's Registry cleaner, which detects a lot
> of unneeded stuff in the Registry.

> When switching mobos, I've deleted the entire SystemDevice branch in
> Window's DeviceManager (preferrably in SafeMode) and then cross checked
with
> a quick glance also in safe mode whether there's still some unwanted
> hardware registered, and then I've simply installed the new mobo.

> My system has always been nicely stable, and also fast. I've compared the
> old install to the new one, and there is no difference in speed nor
> stability. Both are stable, and equally fast.

> During these 2.5 years, whenever I'd had problems and people recommended a
> full reinstall, I later on found out that the problem had nothing to do
with
> my system not being a fresh install, but simply with the new stuff still
> being buggy, because later updates usually cured the problems. Even when I
> tried a quick reinstall (without reinstalling the entire environment, just
> the basic system) for the Audigy1 once, I had to find out that the
problems
> that existed in my full install also existed in the barebone reinstall and
> had nothing to do with remainders of old stuff still being in the system.

> A full reinstall has never helped me, as the prob never was within my
> system, but within the new stuff that didn't work properly for some reason
> (admittedly, perhaps only in certain environments, but a full reinstall
> didn't create such an environment either) and I am under the impression
that
> it also doesn't help that many others, from reading the NGs and forums.

> Now, I know I've given quite a speech here and apologise for that <g> but
it
> simply is a topic I find interesting. Also please believe me that I am not
> trying to criticise your advice in any way, but my personal experience is
as
> I've described above. Personally, I would suggest a reinstall only as the
> very last resort, after _loads_ of other options have been tried. I'd
never
> suggest it early on.

> Achim





> > > I wish people would quit telling others to reformat their hard drives
> and
> > do
> > > a fresh install of Windows to get video drivers to work better--it's
> > > complete horse shit and a huge time consumer.

> > > I guess I hadn't said it enough times to help you.

> > You're talking shite mate.

> > If you are changing manufacturers  - you would be stupid not to
reinstall
> > windows to ensure you've cleared out all the old drivers.

> > Furthermore - this holds true for Soundcards and Motheboards

> > DOug

Mitch_

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

by Mitch_ » Wed, 09 Apr 2003 15:24:55

You know what they say about people who "assume" don't ya?  Again in "this
case" a clean install was a required step in the troubleshooting process.
If you support 250 PC's then you wouldnt likely ever need a clean re-install
of windows.  Of course you have ALL the machines pre-tested before
production and backed up using some sort of image based backup and the user
data on a raid file server eh..  But then again we arent speaking of 250
PC's but 1.   Again my point is supported as why spend 3+ hrs possibly
fixing something vs 2 hrs for guaranteed results barring hdw or compat
issues of course.  He hasnt had any success with this system EVER so his
case doesnt apply here. He must make certain steps that HE can do before he
can escalate the problem to the mfg or local shop if its really a "problem".

/speech off

Unfortunately I can't give much advice over what he's tried.  Board level
diags is whats needed from what I can gather.   Triple check sys bios.
Maybe work backwards in N2k3, meaning turn off nearly all the graphics and
turn each back on till you find the happy medium.  Specular highlights is a
worthless fps hog.

drive a fancy car and bought an after-market sport suspension

Mar

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

by Mar » Wed, 09 Apr 2003 23:12:48


> The system again.
> Clean install of XP pro
> 1gig PC800
> 2.53 P4
> audigy 2
> 120gig HD
> momo
> 9800 Pro.

As I said in another thread - Papy games like nVidia.

N2002 findings recap:
XP1800/Ti4200/OGL same performance as XP2400/9700Pro/D3D (which on the
whole looks a little sweeter but I get the occasional glitch - never
with the Ti4200)

The D3D to D3D comparison shows a 20-25% increase, but I got that
increase on the 1800 already by using OpenGL.

One could safely assume that just "upgrading" the graphics card in the
1800 would have *reduced* performance in N2002.

Other games show the sort of improvement you'd expect.

I doubt there's anything wrong with your system.  Do other games run
better?

Regards,

Mark Davison
OVAL Deputy Admin
Car #69
http://www.mttj4.plus.com/OVAL/

Larr

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

by Larr » Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:59:07

It's article Q815411.

Larry


> Could you give us a little more detail? I couldn't find anything on the
net
> or in Microsoft's Knowledge Base.

> Thanks!

> Achim



> > There's a known slow-down bug with XP SP1, and a fix is available from
> > microsoft.  It's not publically available but should be easy to find on
> the
> > net.
> ...

Marc Collin

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

by Marc Collin » Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:38:53

If you have a system with only NR2003 on it, it will take 2 hours.  If you
use it for a multitude of things, it will take a lot longer and be a lot
more annoying.  Re-setting-up application software is what takes all the
time, not the actual re-install of Windows.  You are free to do it.  I
wouldn't unless it was a last resort and proven to accomplish
something--which increasing frame rates it won't.  As I said, if you do get
a frame rate increase, it's due to something else being out of whack.  You
can flip between nVIDIA and ATI cards repeatedly in XP so long as you
install each one properly with no effect on performance whatsoever compared
to a fresh system.

Marc


> You know what they say about people who "assume" don't ya?  Again in "this
> case" a clean install was a required step in the troubleshooting process.
> If you support 250 PC's then you wouldnt likely ever need a clean
re-install
> of windows.  Of course you have ALL the machines pre-tested before
> production and backed up using some sort of image based backup and the
user
> data on a raid file server eh..  But then again we arent speaking of 250
> PC's but 1.   Again my point is supported as why spend 3+ hrs possibly
> fixing something vs 2 hrs for guaranteed results barring hdw or compat
> issues of course.  He hasnt had any success with this system EVER so his
> case doesnt apply here. He must make certain steps that HE can do before
he
> can escalate the problem to the mfg or local shop if its really a
"problem".

> /speech off

> Unfortunately I can't give much advice over what he's tried.  Board level
> diags is whats needed from what I can gather.   Triple check sys bios.
> Maybe work backwards in N2k3, meaning turn off nearly all the graphics and
> turn each back on till you find the happy medium.  Specular highlights is
a
> worthless fps hog.


I
> drive a fancy car and bought an after-market sport suspension
> > for it.  All the freaks (equivalent to us) at the fan site I belong to
> > laughed because I was asking around where to take the car to have the
new
> > parts installed (dealers don't want to do it because technically the
> > warranty is affected, etc., etc.).  They all would have done it
themselves
> > they said.  Just get your friends to do it with you and pay them with a
> case
> > of beer (preferably after the job was done).  Well, this is the
equivalent
> > to what is being recommended here.  Many of those guys install turbos,
> > change springs, shocks, roll bars, whatever for a hobby.  They are
> tinkering
> > every weekend doing something.  I wouldn't attempt to install expensive
> new
> > springs and shocks on a brand new car myself with NONE of the correct
> tools
> > if my life depended on it.  Let them laugh.  My car runs great and it
cost
> > me a few bucks to have it done professionally.

> > People who just want to use a computer and have some fun with racing
sims
> > don't need to re-install Windows, especially to gain 1 or 2 fps.  If
there
> > is anything more to be gained than that, then you have some other
problem
> > with your installation that needs to be fixed independently.  And
erasing
> > your computer as a way to fix it is stupid and short-sighted, because if
> you
> > allowed the botch-up to occur in the first place (unknowingly), you will
> do
> > it again.  Instead, either leave well enough alone or do what Joachim
has
> > done and learn how to properly maintain your system.

> > </speech off>

> > Marc

Joachim Trens

Radeon 9800 Pro, still sucking

by Joachim Trens » Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:53:34

Thanks Larry.

Now if Mr. Wilson would give us the URL to that '9800 slower than 9700'
review, we'd all be up to date.

Achim



rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.