> > Having neither seen nor tried N3 how can this be said with any greater
> > degree of accuracy than anyone else on the newsgroup can claim? I'd
> > think it unlikely that a "new" engine would be created (different from
> > current old (ICR2, N2) and new (GPL) engines, since that would be a
> > huge and unnecessary undertaking.
> I can only tell you what the people at Papy told me. I don't know where
> everyone in the ng gets their information. We got our information right
> from the source.
Just a quick note here that it was "from the horses mouth" that much
of the reason for GPL was to provide the physics engine to take Papyrus
sims into the next millenium. Mike Lescault represented Papyrus on The
Apex message boards from the onset of the GPL demo and this was one of
the first things he said. I bet my ..... that N3 will use the GPL
engine. It may be slightly upgraded in some areas and even dumbed down
in others, but it will use the GPL engine unless Papy suddenly loses all
sanity. In fact, I'm sure that much of what was learned making the GPL
physics engine will be used in the overhaul of N2 -> N2000 - even some
cutting and pasting :)