rec.autos.simulators

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

ymenar

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by ymenar » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 04:38:53


> Mole hill! LOL

;-)

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.racesimcentral.net/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...

David G Fishe

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by David G Fishe » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 05:10:02


Um, isn't telemetry something they should have done a long time ago?

David G Fisher

Stuart Becktel

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by Stuart Becktel » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 05:06:28

The problem with that arguement is that people who DO NOT have N4 will have
to spend the $50 (or whatever it is now) for N4, as well as  the $30 for the
N2002.
-Stuart Becktell

> I agree to a certain extent. The improvements are few in 2002. N2002
> should be an expansion pack at best. I don't see $50 worth of
> improvements to justify full boat game pricing.


> >   Still haven't seen anything a patch to N4 wouldn't do myself.  It's
> > better, no doubt, but it's what N4 should have been with in the first
place
> > IMO.

John Pancoas

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by John Pancoas » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 06:23:36

  Not really :)  Anyone who spends $50, even last month, for N4 doesn't know
about eBay :)

-John


> The problem with that arguement is that people who DO NOT have N4 will
have
> to spend the $50 (or whatever it is now) for N4, as well as  the $30 for
the
> N2002.
> -Stuart Becktell


> > I agree to a certain extent. The improvements are few in 2002. N2002
> > should be an expansion pack at best. I don't see $50 worth of
> > improvements to justify full boat game pricing.


> > >   Still haven't seen anything a patch to N4 wouldn't do myself.  It's
> > > better, no doubt, but it's what N4 should have been with in the first
> place
> > > IMO.

John Pancoas

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by John Pancoas » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 06:24:24

  Not in a stock car sim, no.  Still shouldn't be for that matter.

-John





> > - exceeded them selfs that is!

> > N2002 will clearly bring us to the next level in the NASCAR-sim-racing
> saga.
> > There  are lots of good things in this demo but for me one thing sticks
> out
> > above the rest;  the telemetry.  Finally we have the ability to see
whats
> > *really* going on...

> Um, isn't telemetry something they should have done a long time ago?

> David G Fisher

Ian Greenwoo

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by Ian Greenwoo » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 07:02:09

I agree - there is that indefinable something in the physics now - as
someone said it is more like a stockcar than GPL with a stockcar body
(as N4 arguably was) - far easier to slide through corners i feel

Ian

On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 19:27:06 +0100, "Mario Petrinovic"


>        For me there is big inprovement in physics, and I'm sure
>people will soon start to realize that. It is much more
>sophisticated.

Dave Henri

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by Dave Henri » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 07:10:04

  I don't get the impression the 2002 is an Addon disc.  Looking at the
program, it is a separate install.  Not having N4 is not a problem.  But
those who have already purchased N4 might not find enough new features to
justify $50.  Especially when EA makes a huge leap from F1cs2k to f12001 for
only $30.
dave henrie

> The problem with that arguement is that people who DO NOT have N4 will
have
> to spend the $50 (or whatever it is now) for N4, as well as  the $30 for
the
> N2002.
> -Stuart Becktell


> > I agree to a certain extent. The improvements are few in 2002. N2002
> > should be an expansion pack at best. I don't see $50 worth of
> > improvements to justify full boat game pricing.


> > >   Still haven't seen anything a patch to N4 wouldn't do myself.  It's
> > > better, no doubt, but it's what N4 should have been with in the first
> place
> > > IMO.

The Other Larr

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by The Other Larr » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 07:04:17

Huh?

-Larry


> The problem with that arguement is that people who DO NOT have N4 will
have
> to spend the $50 (or whatever it is now) for N4, as well as  the $30 for
the
> N2002.
> -Stuart Becktell


> > I agree to a certain extent. The improvements are few in 2002. N2002
> > should be an expansion pack at best. I don't see $50 worth of
> > improvements to justify full boat game pricing.


> > >   Still haven't seen anything a patch to N4 wouldn't do myself.  It's
> > > better, no doubt, but it's what N4 should have been with in the first
> place
> > > IMO.

Goy Larse

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by Goy Larse » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 07:44:00


> I agree to a certain extent. The improvements are few in 2002. N2002
> should be an expansion pack at best. I don't see $50 worth of
> improvements to justify full boat game pricing.

....even Microsoft offers people who have already purchased their
software to upgrade to latest version at a discount :-)

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

http://www.theuspits.com
http://www.teammirage.com

"A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke"
--Groucho Marx--

Ed Solhei

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by Ed Solhei » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 07:57:57

"Jacob Butner" said:

I have no idea.  Prior to Nascar 4, the last sim I installed was GPL!

--
ed_


Y.Minam

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by Y.Minam » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 07:49:59

Is it really end up $50?

 We must spend more bucks for CPU, graphics card, or somesoing for take same
performans as N4.

Y.Minami


> The problem with that arguement is that people who DO NOT have N4 will
have
> to spend the $50 (or whatever it is now) for N4, as well as  the $30 for
the
> N2002.
> -Stuart Becktell


> > I agree to a certain extent. The improvements are few in 2002. N2002
> > should be an expansion pack at best. I don't see $50 worth of
> > improvements to justify full boat game pricing.


> > >   Still haven't seen anything a patch to N4 wouldn't do myself.  It's
> > > better, no doubt, but it's what N4 should have been with in the first
> place
> > > IMO.

Goy Larse

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by Goy Larse » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 07:50:20


> "Jacob Butner" said:
> > Wasn't that in Nascar Heat ? :)

> > Mole hill! LOL

> I have no idea.  Prior to Nascar 4, the last sim I installed was GPL!

In that case you're missing out on a lot of fun Ed, the DTM mod for
NHeat is pretty damn good

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

http://www.theuspits.com
http://www.teammirage.com

"A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke"
--Groucho Marx--

JJ Srickli

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by JJ Srickli » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 10:06:56

DTM's  good but I'm confused as why they ram into the back of ya like a
stockcar. :)



> > "Jacob Butner" said:
> > > Wasn't that in Nascar Heat ? :)

> > > Mole hill! LOL

> > I have no idea.  Prior to Nascar 4, the last sim I installed was GPL!

> In that case you're missing out on a lot of fun Ed, the DTM mod for
> NHeat is pretty damn good

> Beers and cheers
> (uncle) Goy

> http://www.theuspits.com
> http://www.teammirage.com

> "A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke"
> --Groucho Marx--

Stuart Becktel

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by Stuart Becktel » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 11:54:00

What?


> Huh?

> -Larry



> > The problem with that arguement is that people who DO NOT have N4 will
> have
> > to spend the $50 (or whatever it is now) for N4, as well as  the $30 for
> the
> > N2002.
> > -Stuart Becktell


> > > I agree to a certain extent. The improvements are few in 2002. N2002
> > > should be an expansion pack at best. I don't see $50 worth of
> > > improvements to justify full boat game pricing.


> > > >   Still haven't seen anything a patch to N4 wouldn't do myself.
It's
> > > > better, no doubt, but it's what N4 should have been with in the
first
> > place
> > > > IMO.

Ed Solhei

N2002 Demo: Papy has done it again!

by Ed Solhei » Tue, 01 Jan 2002 19:25:55

How's the online racing?

--
ed_

"Goy Larsen"


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.