rec.autos.simulators

> >Excellent job, chaps!  It looks wonderful.
> >There is one point that I'd like to comment on, however, and that is the
> >claim that the original 49 (as debuted at Zandvoort) did not have a
> >transparent screen. This is an incorrect assumption.

> >The car most definitely DID have a perspex screen but it had a shortened
> >(compared to the next version) wrap-around, which ended adjacent the
> >location of the mirrors. The screen was NOT opaque....it was clear
perspex.

> >--
> >Regards,
> >Bruce Kennewell,
> >Canberra, Australia.
> >---------------------------

> >> Try this new link---www.kotr.de/org----its in the cars section

> Andre

> On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 00:06:35 +0100, "Phil Lee"

> >Just downloaded it.  What a work of art.  The attention to detail is
> >amazing, especially the wheels.  Every bit as good, if not better that
the
> >Ferrai and Brabham.

> >Keep up the good work lads.  Can't wait for your next project to be
> >complete.

> >Cheers

> >Phil

> Me neither, but some people in the GPLEA forum did...
> just try it out yourself, you can allways uninstall it...

> Andre

> On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 11:54:57 -0400, "Colin"

> >I didn't notice any change in fps.
> >...Colin

>> Me neither, but some people in the GPLEA forum did...
>> just try it out yourself, you can allways uninstall it...

>> Andre

>> On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 11:54:57 -0400, "Colin"

>> >I didn't notice any change in fps.
>> >...Colin

> I am skeptical of the wheels.

> d....can't afford to lose fps!

> > Does this new Lotus feature a revise rear end, in order to stop it from
> > breaking away whenever I hit the brakes? :-)

> > >Excellent job, chaps!  It looks wonderful.
> > >There is one point that I'd like to comment on, however, and that is
the
> > >claim that the original 49 (as debuted at Zandvoort) did not have a
> > >transparent screen. This is an incorrect assumption.

> > >The car most definitely DID have a perspex screen but it had a
shortened
> > >(compared to the next version) wrap-around, which ended adjacent the
> > >location of the mirrors. The screen was NOT opaque....it was clear
> perspex.

> > >--
> > >Regards,
> > >Bruce Kennewell,
> > >Canberra, Australia.
> > >---------------------------

> > >> Try this new link---www.kotr.de/org----its in the cars section

> Certainly no loss of fps here.

> > Certainly no loss of fps here.

> How do you notice that on a 12" monitor ? :-)

> Beers and cheers
> (uncle) Goy

> "Team Mirage" http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> "The Pits" http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> * Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
> "Spamkiller"    http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> LOL!!
> Well, Uncle, you should know that the smaller the monitor, the better the
> frame-rate.  Those ***y great big 21" things are simply horrendous...they
> chew up fps and bog down when compared to (for example) a 12" screen.
> The ideal is to use the beautiful 9" Sony  monitor that came with the little
> Amstrad 386 back around 1990/91.

> (Seriously, the clarity and resolution on that  little jewel was
> magnificent.  I used one at work and that 9" screen was brighter, clearer
> and easier to read than the 14" unit on another PC that we had).

> > LOL!!
> > Well, Uncle, you should know that the smaller the monitor, the better
the
> > frame-rate.  Those ***y great big 21" things are simply
horrendous...they
> > chew up fps and bog down when compared to (for example) a 12" screen.
> > The ideal is to use the beautiful 9" Sony  monitor that came with the
little
> > Amstrad 386 back around 1990/91.

> > (Seriously, the clarity and resolution on that  little jewel was
> > magnificent.  I used one at work and that 9" screen was brighter,
clearer
> > and easier to read than the 14" unit on another PC that we had).

> Well, Sony's "tubes" has always been excellent, I have one myself in my
> 17" Nokia and wouldn't trade it for anything less, it's about 3 years
> old now, but beat most modern "tubes" on picture quality still, drooling
> over a 19" Nokia now, but I can't really justify the expense...:-)

> Beers and cheers
> (uncle) Goy

> "Team Mirage" http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> "The Pits" http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> * Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
> "Spamkiller"    http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> Well...you've been warned, squire.
> Go to a 19" instead of a 17" and your will suffer a two-inches per
> radiant-pixel reduction in effective frame rate.
> (Our scientific lab has actually worked out that GPL, refreshing at the
> optimal rate of 36fps, willl be brought to a halt on a screen 36" on the
> diagonal. This is called the "Equals One" Effect or, more colloquially, the
> "*** Me Days, It's Stopped!!" syndrome.)

>(Seriously, the clarity and resolution on that  little jewel was
>magnificent.  I used one at work and that 9" screen was brighter, clearer
>and easier to read than the 14" unit on another PC that we had).

> > Well...you've been warned, squire.
> > Go to a 19" instead of a 17" and your will suffer a two-inches per
> > radiant-pixel reduction in effective frame rate.
> > (Our scientific lab has actually worked out that GPL, refreshing at the
> > optimal rate of 36fps, willl be brought to a halt on a screen 36" on the
> > diagonal. This is called the "Equals One" Effect or, more colloquially,
the
> > "*** Me Days, It's Stopped!!" syndrome.)

> LMAO, you suffering from the Chivas effect Bruce ?

> Beers and cheers
> (uncle) Goy

> "Team Mirage" http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> "The Pits" http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> * Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
> "Spamkiller"    http://www.racesimcentral.net/