rec.autos.simulators

>> Hmm on my second ever race at Silverstone I managed to put my Lotus on
>> the front row with a mid 91sec.  I haven't come close to this in any
>> other circuit.  Since then I have run a mid 90 second.

>GPL has AI that will become better with you Speedy.  The more you race, the
>better you get, the better the AI gets also.  Since it was only the second
>time at the circuit, the AI isn't totally up to your speed standards.

>Wait until you can do 1:26's and the rest of the field smokes you ;-)

> >> Hmm on my second ever race at Silverstone I managed to put my Lotus on
> >> the front row with a mid 91sec.  I haven't come close to this in any
> >> other circuit.  Since then I have run a mid 90 second.

> >GPL has AI that will become better with you Speedy.  The more you race, the
> >better you get, the better the AI gets also.  Since it was only the second
> >time at the circuit, the AI isn't totally up to your speed standards.

> >Wait until you can do 1:26's and the rest of the field smokes you ;-)

> is this true at every circuit?

>the AI is designed to go faster as you get faster, check your read me...
>this can be altered using the AI Tweaker in the files section here
>http://gpl.gamestats.com/
>JM

>> >> Hmm on my second ever race at Silverstone I managed to put my Lotus on
>> >> the front row with a mid 91sec.  I haven't come close to this in any
>> >> other circuit.  Since then I have run a mid 90 second.

>> >GPL has AI that will become better with you Speedy.  The more you race, the
>> >better you get, the better the AI gets also.  Since it was only the second
>> >time at the circuit, the AI isn't totally up to your speed standards.

>> >Wait until you can do 1:26's and the rest of the field smokes you ;-)

>> is this true at every circuit?

> I believe the AI is a bit slower because the Papyrus engineer that
> developed the AI lines (the *.lp files in the track folders) for all the
> circuits didn't really like Silverstone and didn't race there very much,
> so he never really nailed a couple of the corners.  Therefore the AI
> lines are a bit slow in a couple of corners and as a result the AI lap
> times are somewhat farther away from Wolfi/Greger-type times than at the
> other tracks.

>Time to crank open the rpy 2 lp convertor then !   (Now whose driving
>line shall we have?)

>Phil

>> I believe the AI is a bit slower because the Papyrus engineer that
>> developed the AI lines (the *.lp files in the track folders) for all the
>> circuits didn't really like Silverstone and didn't race there very much,
>> so he never really nailed a couple of the corners.  Therefore the AI
>> lines are a bit slow in a couple of corners and as a result the AI lap
>> times are somewhat farther away from Wolfi/Greger-type times than at the
>> other tracks.

Warringa) writes:
>EldredP's, then I too can finally win from the AI! :)
>Just making fun here Eldred, no offense :)

>Andre

>>Time to crank open the rpy 2 lp convertor then !   (Now whose driving
>>line shall we have?)

>>Phil

>>> I believe the AI is a bit slower because the Papyrus engineer that
>>> developed the AI lines (the *.lp files in the track folders) for all the
>>> circuits didn't really like Silverstone and didn't race there very much,
>>> so he never really nailed a couple of the corners.  Therefore the AI
>>> lines are a bit slow in a couple of corners and as a result the AI lap
>>> times are somewhat farther away from Wolfi/Greger-type times than at the
>>> other tracks.