>The beginning of the article talks about things written on the GP3 forum at
>High Gear critizing people for discussing the graphics and screenshots.
>Saying it makes him mad when people seem to dissect GP3 yet attacks it in
>the following paragraph saying:"Once again without ONLINE game play GP3 will
>not be worth the box Crammond puts the disk in."
>Now as I said, I'm into attacking Rick or the site, they are great. I've
>been visiting his sites since the F1RS site but the writer of this article
>(Tom?) has to re-check some things. Aren't article like these supposed to
>show both sides? All I see this so Pro-GPL, Anti-everything else attitude.
Pro-GPL, don't you think? The exclusion of multiplayer internet play is a
big minus for GP3. Especially since there are rumors that GP4 or some other
future version will have it.
Of course I'll have to add a GPL comment here: Do you really think GPL would
be as popular (in this newsgroup) if it didn't have its internet multiplay
option?
I've seen things in GPL online races you people wouldn't believe..
Greger Huttu disappearing to the horizon off the shoulders of Zandvoort.
I've watched Casper Gripenbergs on fire at the entry to Masta Kink.
All those moments won't be lost in time like tears in the rain.
As for Rick's site, it can't be that great, since it doesn't work on Netscape
at all, just asks me to use IE4. Who makes this kind of sites anymore? So, I
cannot comment on the whole article, since I can't read it.
-Juha
--