rec.autos.simulators

I know Rick who runs the unofficial and I don't want to offend him or
anything with this but that article must be the most biased, uninformed
article I've ever had the dis-pleasure of reading. I'm surprised at that
author, who appears to be a "true" sim racer.

99% of the article goes on to complain and moan about the lack of "tcp/ip
code".
And all of that rubbish, Would anyone like to take a look here:
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
and tell me on the 25th of June what they see?

Without wanting to turn this thread into a GPL/GP3 debate, the article
starts on this. yet another reading from the book of Kaemmer it seems. As
some of you know I'm a great fan of GPL but hate to see other sims expelled
"because its not GPL".

The beginning of the article talks about things written on the GP3 forum at
High Gear critizing people for discussing the graphics and screenshots.
Saying it makes him mad when people seem to dissect GP3 yet attacks it in
the following paragraph saying:"Once again without ONLINE game play GP3 will
not be worth the box Crammond puts the disk in."

Now as I said, I'm into attacking Rick or the site, they are great. I've
been visiting his sites since the F1RS site but the writer of this article
(Tom?) has to re-check some things. Aren't article like these supposed to
show both sides? All I see this so Pro-GPL, Anti-everything else attitude.

I can't belive it! I know I'll be flamed for this but I've had my word.

Thanks,

Jan.
=---

Who cares about that site?

I mean it's about Ubisoft racing games for God's sake!!!! ;-P

-- seriously, the site is quite biased.
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.

In fact I find it rather unfortunate as he does have some good points in
there, but he sinks his credibility with his agressive statements.

Shame.

Jan.
=---

It may not be GPL, but (when properly patched and snazzed up with community
add-ons) it's still the best modern F1 sim out there.

I don't know about the site being biased or not. I never read any of the
editorial before.

Jan.
=---
<snip>

Just a joke ;)

Please note that when you click on the forum section of the site, by miracle
you appear on the board section of ACT-Labs.  Check out the wheel reviews on
their site.  Pretty obvious :)

<ducks>

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.

<snip>
</snip>

Well I want to make it clear that the site is NOT biased. The guy who runs
the site didn't even write this, its someone he knows how seems to do these
articles from time to time.

Like I said, the site is usually great only this latest article is awful I
feel. I don't want to give the site a bad name or anything, it's a great
site.!

Just this guy who writes these articles I don't agree with.

Hardy har har:-)

Look at the addy I posted and scrool down to the news at June 25th, now that
explain it enough?

:)

--
l8er
ronny

Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
to take effect. Reboot now?
          |\      _,,,---,,_        I want to die like my Grandfather,
   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_              in his sleep.
        |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'     Not like the people in his car,
       '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)            screaming their heads off!

--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------

Surely you jest?
--
Nos

Stephen