>Looking at this from a different perspective how many of you are using
>the MS TCP/IP stack to use the Internet? If the courts say that IE4 is
>not an integrated product what is going to stop NetManage and other IP
>software firms from sueing MS to unbundle the IP protocol, or what about
>Symantic for including Defrag?
means that the Justice Department saw something they felt was a
violation of anti-trust laws. Second, there are a ton of little
applications in Windows that no one has ever objected to (Write,
Paintbrush, Calculator, etc). Their intent was never to compete with
or eliminate competition from other companies who publish full
featured word processors, graphics packages ,etc but rather to give
some basic functionality in that area to the OS owner. IE4 is rather
different. Look at the comparison:
Wordpad/Write vs. Microsoft Word/Corel Wordperfect
Paintbrush vs. Photoshop
Terminal vs. Procomm Plus
IE4 vs. Netscape
Which one is different than the rest? Clearly the latter, because its
a complete, commercial size/quality product being packed in free with
the OS. Obviously, Microsoft could at some point start putting Word
into Win95, but they don't need to. They have nearly the same
monopoly in office suites that they do in Operating Systems. They
also provide OEM Office Suites for sale with computers, so most mail
order companies also give you Office or Home Essentials. So Microsoft
does not feel any compelling need to capture marketshare or destroy a
competitor in the word processing market. Therefore, Wordpad
continues to be the 'word processor' we get for free with Windows. It
is sufficiently functional to do some casual writing, but not a full
featured word processor. For that, you've got to shell out for Word.
So, I don't have a problem with SOME Internet browsing capabilities
being bundled with Win95. I would prefer that it be something with
limited functionality, features and footprint...this justifies
comparing it to Wordpad, Calculator, Paintbrush etc. It means the
customer who just needs a simple browser might be happy, but if they
want the full blown thing they decide between the commercial quality
browsers (including the full IE4). This leaves customers with the
choice without depriving competitors of the ability to compete in the
market. So I simply ask you this: Why did Microsoft feel it
necessary to include the full blown IE4 software with Windows?!
Randy
Randy Magruder
Contributing Reviewer
Digital Sportspage
http://www.racesimcentral.net/