rec.autos.simulators

CPR on 20/20

Scott B. Huste

CPR on 20/20

by Scott B. Huste » Sun, 01 Feb 1998 04:00:00

I dont know how many of you watched the special on Bill Gates on 20/20
Friday night.. but they showed a clip of CPR.  Showing how they have
someone rigged with sensors simulating a pit stop to import into the
game.  They then show a clip of the game...  MOVING AT ABOUT 5 FPS!!!
I just laughed... it was choppy as hell!!  Now that showed the true
nature of the game!!  Of course they threw in that it was a "best seller
for Microsoft".

Good interview though.  Gates is a fascinating man.

Scott
--
/////////////////////////////////////////////////
//                                             //
//      Scott B. Husted                        //
//                                             //
//      http://www.racesimcentral.net/~sbhusted          //
//                                             //

//                                             //

//                                             //      
//      ICQ# 4395450                           //
//                                             //
/////////////////////////////////////////////////

Aaron5

CPR on 20/20

by Aaron5 » Sun, 01 Feb 1998 04:00:00

Yeah, that "Best-Seller" part was the kicker for me.  Laughed for nearly 5
minutes.

Barton Spencer Brow

CPR on 20/20

by Barton Spencer Brow » Mon, 02 Feb 1998 04:00:00


>...the special on Bill Gates on 20/20...but they showed a clip of CPR...Of course they threw in that it was a "best seller for Microsoft".>>

Free prime-time advertising for the "greatest auto racing sim ever
created" -- Bill knows how to market! Take that clip and the glowing
reviews of CPR by the mass-market magazines (which are pristinely
objective, of course -- no one could ever be swayed to bias by the
pitiful sort of advertising budget a mom 'n' pop joint like Microsoft
has to work with), and put it up against the nattering nabobs in here --
well, truth and justice ALWAYS prevail, right?

If every person who ever lurked in this NG were to have some sort of
bizarre alien mind-meld, and they wrote to Microsoft en masse saying
what a piece of ***CPR is (I'm fantasizing, OK?), and if they didn't
FIX it, they'd never buy another Microsoft product as long as they lived
-- imagine the effect it would have on Microsoft: absolutely zero,
zilch, zed, zowie, nada...

As long as MS has the loyal and supportive mainstream of gamers -- the
fast-twitch Duke Nukem this week/Mayhem the next/Super-Slasher *** 'n'
***Mario Brothers the week after -- to go out and plunk down their
lawn-mowing money for whatever hyper-adrenal trendo-schlock parent-shock
diversion-of-the hour the software companies grind out for them, why
should they even give people interested in accurate simulations a second
thought?

Obviously, they haven't.

We will now join Bill in a heartfelt chorus of that old hymn, "Bringing
In The Sheaves"...

Bart (betcha this don't make it either) Brown

Randy Magrud

CPR on 20/20

by Randy Magrud » Mon, 02 Feb 1998 04:00:00


Fascinating in the sense that he apparently successfully assumes that
most people watching TV are incredibly naive.  He puts on this
innocent act on Tv that he's just an innocent little person trying to
make the world a better place.  He absolutely understands the concept
of leverage and how to use it to wipe a competitor off the planet.
Putting IE40 in Win95/98 has nothing to do with innovating the
operating system.  Its all about:  "beat *THIS* distribution
mechanism, Netscape!"

Randy
Randy Magruder
Contributing Reviewer
Digital Sportspage
http://www.digitalsports.com

Barton Spencer Brow

CPR on 20/20

by Barton Spencer Brow » Mon, 02 Feb 1998 04:00:00

Attaboy, Randy!

Bart

Greg Cisk

CPR on 20/20

by Greg Cisk » Tue, 03 Feb 1998 04:00:00


>Well, the issue isn't really the quality of the product, is it?  If

I think it is. I have IE4.0 because there is nothing that netscape gives
me that IE4.0 doesn't. Plus Outlook Express is a fantastic email/news
client. I certainly wouldn't use IE4.0 is it didn't kick some ass. Plus
it is free. You can't beat that. Since I use the Contentric Network as
an ISP I get netscape free (as part of the package). I didn't even
consider it. IE 4.0 is a decent product, and I could care less if
people think Bill will rule the world :-)

--
Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.

Barton Spencer Brow

CPR on 20/20

by Barton Spencer Brow » Tue, 03 Feb 1998 04:00:00

Netscape Navigator is not only free now; the code has also been freed --
something that MS is not too likely to do with IE. So what? Give it
about 4-6 months and I think you'll see.

Bart Brown

Byron Forbe

CPR on 20/20

by Byron Forbe » Tue, 03 Feb 1998 04:00:00


> I dont know how many of you watched the special on Bill Gates on 20/20
> Friday night.. but they showed a clip of CPR.  Showing how they have
> someone rigged with sensors simulating a pit stop to import into the
> game.  They then show a clip of the game...  MOVING AT ABOUT 5 FPS!!!
> I just laughed... it was choppy as hell!!  Now that showed the true
> nature of the game!!  Of course they threw in that it was a "best seller
> for Microsoft".

> Good interview though.  Gates is a fascinating man.

    "Was" a good seller? Have people woken up already and completely
stopped buying it? :))
John Walla

CPR on 20/20

by John Walla » Wed, 04 Feb 1998 04:00:00



>Putting IE40 in Win95/98 has nothing to do with innovating the
>operating system.  Its all about:  "beat *THIS* distribution
>mechanism, Netscape!"

Undoubtedly - the wierd thing is however, I'd use IE4 (or IE3 for that
matter) in any case. It's just a much more intuitive product. Same
goes for Office - a whole lotta hype and hoopla, but it's a really
solid and excellent product.

Maybe CPR99 will be also?

Cheers!
John

Randy Magrud

CPR on 20/20

by Randy Magrud » Wed, 04 Feb 1998 04:00:00




>>Putting IE40 in Win95/98 has nothing to do with innovating the
>>operating system.  Its all about:  "beat *THIS* distribution
>>mechanism, Netscape!"

>Undoubtedly - the wierd thing is however, I'd use IE4 (or IE3 for that
>matter) in any case. It's just a much more intuitive product. Same
>goes for Office - a whole lotta hype and hoopla, but it's a really
>solid and excellent product.

Well, the issue isn't really the quality of the product, is it?  If
IE4 is so wonderful that everyone will want it, why not sell it
through normal distribution mechanisms and let the market  decide?
The problem is, Netscape had the big marketshare, and Microsoft could
afford to give the thing away and not worry about making money on the
deal because they are not funded by browser sales, but by OS and other
application software.  Netscape didn't have that kind of luxury, did
they?  So again, the word is "leverage".  If Bill is so confident in
the superiority of his products, let him charge for them.  If he's
right, he'll still win the browser war.  If he's wrong, he won't.
Again, let the market decide, not the loss-leader distribution system.
It makes me question whether Bill even believes in his own software,
since he can't seem to get away from using OS leverage to knock out
competitors.

Randy
Randy Magruder
Contributing Reviewer
Digital Sportspage
http://www.digitalsports.com

Randy Magrud

CPR on 20/20

by Randy Magrud » Wed, 04 Feb 1998 04:00:00



>>Well, the issue isn't really the quality of the product, is it?  If

>I think it is. I have IE4.0 because there is nothing that netscape gives
>me that IE4.0 doesn't. Plus Outlook Express is a fantastic email/news
>client. I certainly wouldn't use IE4.0 is it didn't kick some ass. Plus
>it is free. You can't beat that.

You're right.  You can't beat that.  Exactly Bill's point.  Microsoft
could afford to lose money on IE4 by bundling it with a cashcow like
Win95/98.  Netscape has no such leverage.  Even if Netscape matched
IE4/Outlook express feature for feature, Microsoft would still win on
price & distribution, wouldn't it?

Randy
Randy Magruder
Contributing Reviewer
Digital Sportspage
http://www.digitalsports.com

Mikes Design

CPR on 20/20

by Mikes Design » Wed, 04 Feb 1998 04:00:00



Hi Randy,
                One the one hand I see what your saying but, isn't that the
point or benefit of becoming very successful in a business climate? I mean
I understand that Netscape cant hope to compete with MS in size or any
other way but, isn't this similar to what we see when say a Wal-Mart opens
in a town like where I live? They did and killed a bunch of long time
retailers who just couldn't compete for whatever reasons. Be it mass buying
power etc. Don't get me wrong I think it really was a pity as many of those
older stores had much better service and quality of product IMO. I would
like to hear more views on all this as I am really interested in why this
is all going on. I am not so well informed on the whole Justice Dept./MS
story. I know as a contractor almost all of the work I get it due to having
the lowest bid. Of course I cant due it for free to knock off my
competition, but I can throw in some "extras" as I usually do. Are these
things that I sited similar to the I.E4 or am I missing something? Just
curious, Cya, Mike

John Walla

CPR on 20/20

by John Walla » Wed, 04 Feb 1998 04:00:00



>You're right.  You can't beat that.  Exactly Bill's point.  Microsoft
>could afford to lose money on IE4 by bundling it with a cashcow like
>Win95/98.  Netscape has no such leverage.  Even if Netscape matched
>IE4/Outlook express feature for feature, Microsoft would still win on
>price & distribution, wouldn't it?

Not if Netscape only matched them, no it wouldn't. It's a bit like AMD
trying to oust Intel from their *** position - as long as you
come up with products that are "as good" or "almost equal" you have no
chance. When you're chasing you need to offer more or better in at
least one aspect of the product, and right now Netscape are arguably
behind on price, availability, image and product quality.

Cheers!
John

Greg Cisk

CPR on 20/20

by Greg Cisk » Wed, 04 Feb 1998 04:00:00


Not quite similar. IE4.0 is a MS product which they give away free.
You would have to give everyone (who wants it) a free construction
something or other. Like manufacturing your own track lighting
and giving it out free no questions asked. I doubt you would have
the financial resources for that. Do you? I could use some :-)

--
Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.

Walk Walke

CPR on 20/20

by Walk Walke » Wed, 04 Feb 1998 04:00:00

Mike, I think the whole justice dept. issue revolves around what they call
"predatory pricing". MS can afford to distribute, for free, a great product.
Netscape can not. Therefore, MS must be trying to drive Netscape out of
business.

I think this is an invalid argument. MS can afford to give IE4.0 away
because there is so much money in their other core lines of business. The
entire Back Office suite sales (SQL server, SMS, Proxy Server, etc.) allows
them to give away a product like IE4.0. Netscape also offers a similar suite
of software that pound-for-pound isn't up to***with the MS line.

The real issue here is survival in a competitive marketplace. If Netscape
hadn't rested on their laurels, they might be in a better position than they
are in now. It is ridiculous to blame all of Netscape's problems on MS.

When Bill Gates started MS, he transformed the Information Revolution. 90%
of the technologies we all enjoy today stem directly and indirectly from the
products MS has created. No one handed them the divine rights to rule this
next generation of the computing age. They earned it with solid products and
an intelligent marketing plan. MS fought and is still fighting the survival
of the fittest. Look at IBM *** in the 80s. What are they doing today?

As far as the full scope of the DOJ investigation goes, I again think it is
unfounded and unnecessary. Bundling IE4.0 with Win98 or Win95 should be no
big deal. Every COMPAQ computer also comes with AOL installed and you don't
hear any whining about that...

-/- Walk Walker
BAMotorsports
A Premium Sim-Racing Team


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.