I just want a modern F1 sim that has more realistic physics than the UBIsoft tittles. If Papy does a modern F1 sim with the GPL
engine and the car feels like a modern car with downforce and stiff suspension (actually I would really like it with early 80's cars
that had big tires and no ground effects), then I might like it better than GP3. I just want something with modern graphics and
better physics than the Ubisuck games.
Lutrell :-)
DSR # 74
http://insideracingtechnology.com/dsr1.htm
>I don't get it.
>It may look pretty, but surely if the physics engine is virtually the same
>as GP2, then whats the point. It will be effectively GP2.5 or GP2+
>Surely the real reason to buy this sim is if the physics are more realistic
>than its predecessor.
>Since GPL came out, nothing has got close. GP3 must be at the same level.
>Shame that won't happen because 'arcade' drivers will moan its too hard.
>GP3 will also sell even if the physics aren't that different, just because
>of the name.
>Ohh well, my opinion :)
>Gavin
>www.sharknose.freeserve.co.uk
>> Looks like it could have great graphics, but what PC system will it need
>to run smooth with all cars. When GP2 came out, I had a
>> fast PC for the time and the game ran a bit slow with all graphics and
>car. If the driving physics of GP3 are at least as good as
>> GP2, then I will play it even if I can only run a few cars with these
>graphics.
>> Cant wait!
>> Lutrell :-)
>> DSR # 74
>> http://insideracingtechnology.com/dsr1.htm
>> >http://www.futurenet.com/pcgamer/games/game_shots.asp?item_id=2209&vti=p
>> >The middle screenshot is obviously from GP2, but wow.
>> >--
>> >-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
>> >-- May the Downforce be with you...
>> >"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
>> >how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."