rec.autos.simulators

GPL force feeback - setting latency in core.ini

David Ewin

GPL force feeback - setting latency in core.ini

by David Ewin » Thu, 24 Jan 2002 06:15:02

I've been tweaking my core.ini settings for force feedback for my new
Logitech Momo wheel and I have been having some trouble with latency.
I understand that the current thinking is not to set latency by bumping
kerbs, but to swerve back and forth on a straight and try to get the
feedback to match.  What exactly are you trying to feel in this
exercise? Should the wheel get light during this?  How fast do you drive
when you do this test? When I try this going very slowly (around 20
mph), I can get what I think is okay, but if I step it up to 40 mph the
wheel gets completely light and I have absolutely no control.  Does that
indicate a latency that is too long?

Any help with this would be appreciated.

Dave Ewing

--
*****************************************************
David A. Ewing

*****************************************************

Kirk Hous

GPL force feeback - setting latency in core.ini

by Kirk Hous » Thu, 24 Jan 2002 06:43:36

From what I've read to have latency free reactions GPL has to predict what
you should be feeling instead of what the wheel is actually doing.  If you
increase the latency GPL has to do less predicting and you get better
feedback but you'll be feeling the road behind your car.  Can somebody clear
this up?  Are any super low latency wheels coming out?


> I've been tweaking my core.ini settings for force feedback for my new
> Logitech Momo wheel and I have been having some trouble with latency.
> I understand that the current thinking is not to set latency by bumping
> kerbs, but to swerve back and forth on a straight and try to get the
> feedback to match.  What exactly are you trying to feel in this
> exercise? Should the wheel get light during this?  How fast do you drive
> when you do this test? When I try this going very slowly (around 20
> mph), I can get what I think is okay, but if I step it up to 40 mph the
> wheel gets completely light and I have absolutely no control.  Does that
> indicate a latency that is too long?

> Any help with this would be appreciated.

> Dave Ewing

> --
> *****************************************************
> David A. Ewing

> *****************************************************

Haqsa

GPL force feeback - setting latency in core.ini

by Haqsa » Thu, 24 Jan 2002 08:28:00

What you are looking for is for the forces to feel natural and in phase
with your steering motions.  Admittedly, it can be easy to fool yourself
this way.  After playing with is some more, I think the best way to test
it is to make a single lane-change type maneuver, as if pulling out to
pass someone, rather than constantly swerving back and forth.  The
reason is that even with real cars, if you swerve back and forth at the
wrong frequency you can get out of phase with the chassis frequency, and
then end up swerving wider and wider, much like what happens with the
wrong latency correction.  But with a single passing type maneuver the
feeling is immediate and very obvious.  In this type of maneuver you
should feel resistance to the initial motion, the force should change
direction as you bring the wheel back the other way to straighten out,
and then should die out very quickly as the car straightens out.  With
inadequate latency correction the force will continue in the same
direction after you have already reversed the direction of the wheel,
and will often throw the wheel back the other way.  Try it at a medium
speed like maybe 60 to 80 mph, so that you do not have to deal with loss
of traction, which will change what you are feeling.  When it is correct
it should feel as natural as changing lanes to pass someone on the
highway.  When it is incorrect it feels obviously wrong.

BTW if you also have NASCAR 4 save yourself some trouble and try setting
it there first.  Do the same exercise as above, but at Watkins Glen in
Simulation mode with the "<fast>" setup, so that there is some
similarity in the steering ratio.  This is quicker because you can
change it from the options menu without even getting out of your test
session.  For me at least, the value that worked right in N4 also worked
right in GPL.


> I've been tweaking my core.ini settings for force feedback for my new
> Logitech Momo wheel and I have been having some trouble with latency.
> I understand that the current thinking is not to set latency by
bumping
> kerbs, but to swerve back and forth on a straight and try to get the
> feedback to match.  What exactly are you trying to feel in this
> exercise? Should the wheel get light during this?  How fast do you
drive
> when you do this test? When I try this going very slowly (around 20
> mph), I can get what I think is okay, but if I step it up to 40 mph
the
> wheel gets completely light and I have absolutely no control.  Does
that
> indicate a latency that is too long?

> Any help with this would be appreciated.

> Dave Ewing

> --
> *****************************************************
> David A. Ewing

> *****************************************************

Juan Vizos

GPL force feeback - setting latency in core.ini

by Juan Vizos » Thu, 24 Jan 2002 23:40:12

Hehe .. just a casual aside thrown in here...   I 've got two pc's set up to
race and so have two ff wheels..   one act labs which is sorted but the
early guillemot ferrari wheel on the other machine   is really hard to keep
straight !!
              It reminds me of that old van we all set off for morocco in..
the one with the half inch play either way in the steering...  in order to
keep in a straight line you have to describe a gentle series of arcs along
the track, valiantly trying to keep up as the ff wanders back and forth...
while my co teamie has a tried and successful way with this drawback, which
involves the honda .and turning the ff waaay down...., he   has most success
on tracks without long straight bits....


> What you are looking for is for the forces to feel natural and in phase
> with your steering motions.  Admittedly, it can be easy to fool yourself
> this way.  After playing with is some more, I think the best way to test
> it is to make a single lane-change type maneuver, as if pulling out to
> pass someone, rather than constantly swerving back and forth.  The
> reason is that even with real cars, if you swerve back and forth at the
> wrong frequency you can get out of phase with the chassis frequency, and
> then end up swerving wider and wider, much like what happens with the
> wrong latency correction.  But with a single passing type maneuver the
> feeling is immediate and very obvious.  In this type of maneuver you
> should feel resistance to the initial motion, the force should change
> direction as you bring the wheel back the other way to straighten out,
> and then should die out very quickly as the car straightens out.  With
> inadequate latency correction the force will continue in the same
> direction after you have already reversed the direction of the wheel,
> and will often throw the wheel back the other way.  Try it at a medium
> speed like maybe 60 to 80 mph, so that you do not have to deal with loss
> of traction, which will change what you are feeling.  When it is correct
> it should feel as natural as changing lanes to pass someone on the
> highway.  When it is incorrect it feels obviously wrong.

> BTW if you also have NASCAR 4 save yourself some trouble and try setting
> it there first.  Do the same exercise as above, but at Watkins Glen in
> Simulation mode with the "<fast>" setup, so that there is some
> similarity in the steering ratio.  This is quicker because you can
> change it from the options menu without even getting out of your test
> session.  For me at least, the value that worked right in N4 also worked
> right in GPL.



> > I've been tweaking my core.ini settings for force feedback for my new
> > Logitech Momo wheel and I have been having some trouble with latency.
> > I understand that the current thinking is not to set latency by
> bumping
> > kerbs, but to swerve back and forth on a straight and try to get the
> > feedback to match.  What exactly are you trying to feel in this
> > exercise? Should the wheel get light during this?  How fast do you
> drive
> > when you do this test? When I try this going very slowly (around 20
> > mph), I can get what I think is okay, but if I step it up to 40 mph
> the
> > wheel gets completely light and I have absolutely no control.  Does
> that
> > indicate a latency that is too long?

> > Any help with this would be appreciated.

> > Dave Ewing

> > --
> > *****************************************************
> > David A. Ewing

> > *****************************************************

David Ewin

GPL force feeback - setting latency in core.ini

by David Ewin » Fri, 25 Jan 2002 04:56:10

Thanks, Haqsau, I'll give this a try.

Dave Ewing


> What you are looking for is for the forces to feel natural and in phase
> with your steering motions.  Admittedly, it can be easy to fool yourself
> this way.  After playing with is some more, I think the best way to test
> it is to make a single lane-change type maneuver, as if pulling out to
> pass someone, rather than constantly swerving back and forth.  The
> reason is that even with real cars, if you swerve back and forth at the
> wrong frequency you can get out of phase with the chassis frequency, and
> then end up swerving wider and wider, much like what happens with the
> wrong latency correction.  But with a single passing type maneuver the
> feeling is immediate and very obvious.  In this type of maneuver you
> should feel resistance to the initial motion, the force should change
> direction as you bring the wheel back the other way to straighten out,
> and then should die out very quickly as the car straightens out.  With
> inadequate latency correction the force will continue in the same
> direction after you have already reversed the direction of the wheel,
> and will often throw the wheel back the other way.  Try it at a medium
> speed like maybe 60 to 80 mph, so that you do not have to deal with loss
> of traction, which will change what you are feeling.  When it is correct
> it should feel as natural as changing lanes to pass someone on the
> highway.  When it is incorrect it feels obviously wrong.

--
*****************************************************
David A. Ewing

*****************************************************

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.