rec.autos.simulators

by **Gunnar Horrigm** » Sat, 18 Aug 2001 03:55:57

..and it sucks. big time. not only are the graphics _worse_ than on
the Dreamcast, but I found it totally impossible to judge distance.
this, of course, will make it unplayable. for me anyway.

--
Gunnar
#31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
myk, trygg og god.

by **Galley_SimRace** » Sat, 18 Aug 2001 04:54:20

> ...and it sucks. big time. not only are the graphics _worse_ than on
> the Dreamcast, but I found it totally impossible to judge distance.
> this, of course, will make it unplayable. for me anyway.

Yeah, it's NOT TOO GOOD!
--
Stuff You Gotta Have
software for BeOS and PalmOS
http://www.stuffyougottahave.com/

by **Rafe McAulif** » Sat, 18 Aug 2001 14:59:47

Not surprised. The PC version was complete crap. Removed it after a
day.

Rafe Mc

On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:54:20 GMT, Galley_SimRacer

>> ...and it sucks. big time. not only are the graphics _worse_ than on
>> the Dreamcast, but I found it totally impossible to judge distance.
>> this, of course, will make it unplayable. for me anyway.

>Yeah, it's NOT TOO GOOD!

by **Gunnar Horrigm** » Sat, 18 Aug 2001 19:53:23

> Not surprised. The PC version was complete crap. Removed it after a
> day.

the PC version is a different beast alltogether. the PS2 version is a
port of the Dreamcast version, which is pretty decent.

--
Gunnar
#31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
gnus don't kill people. gnus-summary-lower-score kills people.

by **Rafe McAulif** » Sat, 18 Aug 2001 21:38:27

Fair enuff. Have they changed it a lot?

Rafe Mc

>> Not surprised. The PC version was complete crap. Removed it after a
>> day.

>the PC version is a different beast alltogether. the PS2 version is a
>port of the Dreamcast version, which is pretty decent.

by **Gunnar Horrigm** » Sat, 18 Aug 2001 21:41:48

> Fair enuff. Have they changed it a lot?

don't think so. but like I said, distance-perception was completely shot.

it gets a bit tricky to find your braking point when you can't see if
your 25 og 200 meters from the turn.

--
Gunnar
#31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
"a poster is a human being or the software equivalent"

by **Gunnar Horrigm** » Sat, 18 Aug 2001 21:43:27

> Fair enuff. Have they changed it a lot?

don't think so. but like I said, distance-perception was completely shot.

it gets a bit tricky to find your braking point when you can't see if
your 25 or 200 meters from the turn.

--
Gunnar
#31 SUCKS#015 Tupperware MC#002 DoD#0x1B DoDRT#003 DoD:CT#4,8 Kibo: 2
"a poster is a human being or the software equivalent"

by **Alex Kihuran** » Sun, 19 Aug 2001 00:29:15

They didn't change anything because it's a completely different game made by
a different developer but sold under the same name with the same publisher.
I tried the PC version and have the DC version on my DC and the DC version
is MUCH better, but F355 Challenge is still better :)

Thanks,
Alex

> Fair enuff. Have they changed it a lot?

> Rafe Mc

> >> Not surprised. The PC version was complete crap. Removed it after a
> >> day.

> >the PC version is a different beast alltogether. the PS2 version is a
> >port of the Dreamcast version, which is pretty decent.

rec.autos.simulators

ok, so I tested Le Mans for the PS2

ok, so I tested Le Mans for the PS2

ok, so I tested Le Mans for the PS2

ok, so I tested Le Mans for the PS2

ok, so I tested Le Mans for the PS2

ok, so I tested Le Mans for the PS2

ok, so I tested Le Mans for the PS2

ok, so I tested Le Mans for the PS2

ok, so I tested Le Mans for the PS2