rec.autos.simulators

GP4 Mini-Review

jason moy

GP4 Mini-Review

by jason moy » Sun, 15 Sep 2002 11:46:36

Sorry if it looks like I'm quoting Frank, for some reason supernews
doesn't have the original post.

On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 21:03:00 -0400, "ymenard"



>> The UI is atrocious. It's as if Crammond wants GP4 to fail. (Maybe he
>does.)
>> But, if you can manage to get all the helps turned off, the controller set
>> up, the graphics at a sensible PO and FF turned off, you will be treated
>to
>> the finest *driving* simulator offered for PC. The *** is, with the
>> attitude that 95% of the people here have, you will never actually
>> experience GP4.

>> ....as 95% of the people here have not, as is obvious from the inaccuracy
>of
>> 95% of the posts about GP4.

Hi, thanks for implying I'm a moron.

Anyway, I spent 4 hours driving the simulation with all aids turned
off, no steering help, and my controller properly configured (10
degree lock, 0% steering help, 0% reduce with speed).  Granted, I
spent about 2 of those hours trying to calibrate and configure my
controller since, regardless of what you actually select, the game (as
GP3 did) automatically uses the default controller to select things in
the menus.  The entire concept of having "steering lock" as a
controller option rather than a car setup parameter is also
ridiculous.

Things I learned from this:

- the driving model is less convincing than a need for speed game -
anyone who has seen an in-car view of a modern F1 race knows that the
drivers navigate turns by using constant wheel lock and steering with
the throttle, something that is impossible in this game (and makes it
overly difficult to drive since you have to vary wheel lock instead of
throttle travel)
- the Ferrari, BAR, etc all have 6 gears - welcome to the year 1996,
Geoff
- the invisible barriers are a curious design decision, as is the poor
cllision detection in general
- gotta love bringing the car to a stop, switching to a replay, then
realizing that the car is hovering 2-3 inches above the ground
- the tracks and graphics are incredible, almost to the point of
making me want to play it anyway - almost

Jason

-----
GPLRank 24.50
N2002Rank -12.995

mark jeangerar

GP4 Mini-Review

by mark jeangerar » Sun, 15 Sep 2002 12:28:25

You are exactly the attitude I am talking about. I'm willing to bet you've
never even driven GP4.

In this group we get a lot of posts from guys like you, in the manner in
which you post. A whole lot of "shirt", not so much "stuffing". You're
statement on it's own indicates that you would never touch a Crammond game.
It also indicates that, had you, you would slander it regardless of you real
opinion. After all, you do have a reputation to keep up here, and changing
your mind about something on r.a.s. would be to commit credible suicide.

The problem, as I see it, is not your opinion of GP4 because you are well
entitled to it whatever your reasons. The problem is in the fact that you
answered my post. Reading through the GP4 posts on r.a.s., one comes away
with the distinct impression that it is the single worst driving and racing
simulator that has ever been produced. Nothing could be further from the
truth. Also, the fact that you cite "the simracing community" as the
authority in your post (another thing that leads me to believe you have
never driven GP4, not having an opinion of your own) is a cheap trick.
Unfortunately, it becomes more effective every time it is uttered. If the
"simracing community" that will follow you and those like you, rather than
think on their own, could have the clarity of mind to make their own
decisions - an approach without bias and preconception - many of them would
side against "the simracing community". No so much for the need to take a
side, mind you. But rather to simply choose what they perceive to suit their
individual needs more satisfactorily.

That being said, GP4 is an excellent racing simulator. As good as anything
else available anyway. It is a superior driving simulator because of the
tire model alone. (Although you would have to have had some experience at
the limit of adhesion to recognize it and there in lies the flaw with
marketing it to the general public. In this forum however, I would have to
assume that that is what we would treasure as much as anything else.) What
it isn't, is racing software. All "sims" should be racing software, at least
since GPL came out. It's unfortunate that more titles aren't up to date in
multiplay.

Confusing the abilities of any title is unfair to those who come here for
information. In the case of GPx it's outright bigotry. There are so many
things that I want to explore with GP4 but am afraid to post here. I fear
asking a simple question and getting 40 replies that all but answer the
question. I fear the prejudice and close minded conformity that will
disallow even the good natured response from providing any real substance.

...and it's all because of ***s like you that have nothing constructive
to add and, apparently, a whole bunch of spare time.

...maybe you should get a hobby...

...like driving a sim or something. At least then your posts would be on
topic and substantive.

--

"Nothing gets closer!" - Crammond

mark



> > The UI is atrocious. It's as if Crammond wants GP4 to fail. (Maybe he
> does.)
> > But, if you can manage to get all the helps turned off, the controller
set
> > up, the graphics at a sensible PO and FF turned off, you will be treated
> to
> > the finest *driving* simulator offered for PC. The *** is, with the
> > attitude that 95% of the people here have, you will never actually
> > experience GP4.

> > ....as 95% of the people here have not, as is obvious from the
inaccuracy
> of
> > 95% of the posts about GP4.

> Sorry, that doesn't convince me at all.  GP4, or any title in the history
of
> *** that will continue to bare all the idiosyncrasies of a Geoff
Crammond
> game engine is and WILL fail to be considered by the simracing community
as
> a serious racing simulator.

> Even if it hides some little hint of gem, it's still mixed up with a ton
of
> turd.

> --
> -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> -- http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
> Corporation - helping America into the New World...

Dave Henri

GP4 Mini-Review

by Dave Henri » Sun, 15 Sep 2002 12:44:58


  Well of Course it's Captain,  but we don't go around saying Captain Penske
now do we??  :)
Besides calling him Captain brings back bad memories about loosing his
boat.(see I didn't say ship like most non-squids would say.)

dave henrie



> > "Steve Smith" <

> > > I'm continually amazed at how ignorant game zines and e-zines are abt.
> > > sims - not just car sims, but flight sims.  They seem to know the most
> > abt.
> > > stuff that never existed: dragons, monsters, aliens, sorcery, alchemy,
> > magic
> > > potions, and the Lost Dry-Cleaners of Atlantis.

> > > --Steve
> >   What do you mean they didn't exist?  I can personally vouch for Nemo
the
> > owner of the Lost Dry-Cleaners of Atlantis...  :)
> > dave henrie

Darf

GP4 Mini-Review

by Darf » Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:06:31

The trouble is everyone has tried to tell him to burn the barn down
(including all the turds) and build a new Barn. (a new physics engine).
But he just continues trying to reorganise the turds in the old Barn, and
keeps painting the outside to make it look pretty.
How many of you guys have heard the Wiggles say
 " WAKE UP GEOFF "  ?



> Even if it hides some little hint of gem, it's still mixed up with a ton
of
> turd.

Darf

GP4 Mini-Review

by Darf » Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:59:36

Not trying to get anybody upset here or start flamewars 3.
Myself and quite a few of the guys that post here, guys that I race with,
have tried GP4. People that I have spoken to about it, in general have the
same opinion as myself. I have used racing sims / games since F1GP was
around.
As you know this was the first of the GP series. I have done extensive
tampering with GP2 and 3. No matter what I have tried, I have never even
closely reproduced the "feeling" of the physics engines of GPL or even
F12002, or even LFS for that matter. IMHO even ICR2 had a lot better feel to
it than any of the GP series.
Now here I must admit the following:
I heard a lot of bad reports about GP4, even before hearing the General
consensus about it on R.A.S.
With that in mind, I borrowed a copy of GP4, installed it and gave it a try.
At first it was undrivable, after using the Auto Graphics Config.
I then tried running it a few more times. It was better.Got onto R.A.S.,
Tried a few of the Tips, Tricks, Tweaks etc.
Now Don't get me wrong, the game was playable. One guy on R.A.S. said that
he loved the game as a non serious sim, and used the Hotseat function when
his Buddies came around and got Zonked together.
Now I admit that I have NOT spent hours tweaking it and messing with it to
try and get the feel better.
The reasons for this are:
1. IMHO GP4 still has the same feel as GP3 and 2.
    The Car seems to Handle like it is on rails, then suddenly it is gone.
    ( This is very reminiscent of F1RS )
2. GP4 is letdown by the lack of any Online ability.
Now just remember these 2 things:
This is all only IMHO (everyone is entitled to that)
If anyone has any more tips on setting the car or controls etc up, that will
give the car a more realistic (IMHO) feel, please Post and I will try your
recommendations and take the big McLaren out for a few more laps.
Nobody wanted The GP series to be good more than I did. I rushed down to the
Computer store like a Dog on Heat the day GP2 was released.
This still didn't change my opinion of the Game or of what I think of the
Series now.
By very strong contrast, When I first installed GPL I thought it was the
biggest pile of Shiite that had ever been written. But after learning a bit
about it, and tampering a bit, and realising that these old (no winged) cars
were supposed to be 4 wheel drifted around corners, It ended up as being the
most rewarding SIM that I have ever used.
My respect for it now has only increased, with the hardware that exists now,
this SIM is truly awesome, even if its graphics by today's standards are
only so so.
After 2 years of the CD sitting in it's box, I am now enjoying it more than
ever.
I am always willing to keep an open mind about anything, no matter what
others have to say about it.
In my experience, most of the guys that post at R.A.S. are the same.

Darf


> You are exactly the attitude I am talking about. I'm willing to bet you've
> never even driven GP4.

> In this group we get a lot of posts from guys like you, in the manner in
> which you post. A whole lot of "shirt", not so much "stuffing". You're
> statement on it's own indicates that you would never touch a Crammond
game.
> It also indicates that, had you, you would slander it regardless of you
real
> opinion. After all, you do have a reputation to keep up here, and changing
> your mind about something on r.a.s. would be to commit credible suicide.

> The problem, as I see it, is not your opinion of GP4 because you are well
> entitled to it whatever your reasons. The problem is in the fact that you
> answered my post. Reading through the GP4 posts on r.a.s., one comes away
> with the distinct impression that it is the single worst driving and
racing
> simulator that has ever been produced. Nothing could be further from the
> truth. Also, the fact that you cite "the simracing community" as the
> authority in your post (another thing that leads me to believe you have
> never driven GP4, not having an opinion of your own) is a cheap trick.
> Unfortunately, it becomes more effective every time it is uttered. If the
> "simracing community" that will follow you and those like you, rather than
> think on their own, could have the clarity of mind to make their own
> decisions - an approach without bias and preconception - many of them
would
> side against "the simracing community". No so much for the need to take a
> side, mind you. But rather to simply choose what they perceive to suit
their
> individual needs more satisfactorily.

> That being said, GP4 is an excellent racing simulator. As good as anything
> else available anyway. It is a superior driving simulator because of the
> tire model alone. (Although you would have to have had some experience at
> the limit of adhesion to recognize it and there in lies the flaw with
> marketing it to the general public. In this forum however, I would have to
> assume that that is what we would treasure as much as anything else.) What
> it isn't, is racing software. All "sims" should be racing software, at
least
> since GPL came out. It's unfortunate that more titles aren't up to date in
> multiplay.

> Confusing the abilities of any title is unfair to those who come here for
> information. In the case of GPx it's outright bigotry. There are so many
> things that I want to explore with GP4 but am afraid to post here. I fear
> asking a simple question and getting 40 replies that all but answer the
> question. I fear the prejudice and close minded conformity that will
> disallow even the good natured response from providing any real substance.

> ...and it's all because of ***s like you that have nothing
constructive
> to add and, apparently, a whole bunch of spare time.

> ...maybe you should get a hobby...

> ...like driving a sim or something. At least then your posts would be on
> topic and substantive.

> --

> "Nothing gets closer!" - Crammond

> mark




> > > The UI is atrocious. It's as if Crammond wants GP4 to fail. (Maybe he
> > does.)
> > > But, if you can manage to get all the helps turned off, the controller
> set
> > > up, the graphics at a sensible PO and FF turned off, you will be
treated
> > to
> > > the finest *driving* simulator offered for PC. The *** is, with the
> > > attitude that 95% of the people here have, you will never actually
> > > experience GP4.

> > > ....as 95% of the people here have not, as is obvious from the
> inaccuracy
> > of
> > > 95% of the posts about GP4.

> > Sorry, that doesn't convince me at all.  GP4, or any title in the
history
> of
> > *** that will continue to bare all the idiosyncrasies of a Geoff
> Crammond
> > game engine is and WILL fail to be considered by the simracing community
> as
> > a serious racing simulator.

> > Even if it hides some little hint of gem, it's still mixed up with a ton
> of
> > turd.

> > --
> > -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> > -- http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> > -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
> > Corporation - helping America into the New World...

Damien Smit

GP4 Mini-Review

by Damien Smit » Sun, 15 Sep 2002 18:15:43

Reading your post, I was about to ask if you'd tried the Hungary conversion.
Then I saw this...

Give it a go.  It's a big improvement on the F1 2002 version and gives a
glimpse of how good F1 200X could be if ISI got the tracks right.  Monaco is
probably the most disappointing track in F1 2002 - considering it's the most
famous, you'd think they would have put more effort into it...

Damien Smit

GP4 Mini-Review

by Damien Smit » Sun, 15 Sep 2002 18:20:02

No!  Don't do it.  We must, as sim racers, do everything in our power to
discourage big companies making wannabe sim-rubbish like GP4. ; )

res0zlh

GP4 Mini-Review

by res0zlh » Sun, 15 Sep 2002 19:01:47

the GP4 posts on r.a.s., one comes away

While I have yet to try GP4 , my experiences with GP3 would tend to lead me
to expect that it is at least a decent simulator with some significant
virtues, even if it maybe lacking in some areas , and overall compared to
the competition. Generally, I have found that if the concensus of opinion in
this group is that a game is the "best" of its genre, then I will probably
love that game. If  the majority think it's "crap", but at least a few
people think its "great", then the game is probably a flawed gem ( GP4 would
seem to fit this category).  Then there are the games that nobody seems to
have a good opinion of or are just lukewarm about , and chances are those
games are not worth my time investigating.
 I have played alot of good racing games that have been declared " utter
***"  by some of the more knowledgeable members of this newsgroup, but I
have learned over the years to read between the lines of their posts, and
cull the worthwhile information from their reviews, and ignore their
personal biases, as well as their tendencies to see things as black and
white ("great sim or Arcade crap"} . You have those who love Papyrus
products to the extent that all other non-PAPY products are "crap" or just a
notch above being "crap".  You have those people for whom GPL was such a
revelation in authenticity, that they will only grudgingly acknowledge any
virtues in any new sims, lest they be disloyal to their first love , GPL. So
I look for those grudging compliments in their posts, and figure that the
game must be pretty good in those areas. Then you have the "console game
haters", from whom you can pretty much ignore any of their opinions of
console racing games, and only pay attention to their PC sim reviews. For
valid console racing game reviews you pretty much have to look for reviews
from people who like both GPL as well as GT3, since they know what great sim
physics feel like, and are not PC snobs.  If you read plenty of magazine or
e-zine reviews along with numerous posts in R.A.S. , you can get a pretty
good feel for which games are Great, good, adequate, or truly "crap".
GP3 certainly had a number of faults, but it also had it's virtues, which
made it great fun to play, at least until I started playing F12001, which
also had it's flaws but a few more virtues ( particularly the great force
feedback effects ). GP3 did not suddenly become "crap" to me simply because
F12001 was so much more fun, it just became second rate by comparison.


> You are exactly the attitude I am talking about. I'm willing to bet you've
> never even driven GP4.

> In this group we get a lot of posts from guys like you, in the manner in
> which you post. A whole lot of "shirt", not so much "stuffing". You're
> statement on it's own indicates that you would never touch a Crammond
game.
> It also indicates that, had you, you would slander it regardless of you
real
> opinion. After all, you do have a reputation to keep up here, and changing
> your mind about something on r.a.s. would be to commit credible suicide.

> The problem, as I see it, is not your opinion of GP4 because you are well
> entitled to it whatever your reasons. The problem is in the fact that you
> answered my post. Reading through the GP4 posts on r.a.s., one comes away
> with the distinct impression that it is the single worst driving and
racing
> simulator that has ever been produced. Nothing could be further from the
> truth. Also, the fact that you cite "the simracing community" as the
> authority in your post (another thing that leads me to believe you have
> never driven GP4, not having an opinion of your own) is a cheap trick.
> Unfortunately, it becomes more effective every time it is uttered. If the
> "simracing community" that will follow you and those like you, rather than
> think on their own, could have the clarity of mind to make their own
> decisions - an approach without bias and preconception - many of them
would
> side against "the simracing community". No so much for the need to take a
> side, mind you. But rather to simply choose what they perceive to suit
their
> individual needs more satisfactorily.

> That being said, GP4 is an excellent racing simulator. As good as anything
> else available anyway. It is a superior driving simulator because of the
> tire model alone. (Although you would have to have had some experience at
> the limit of adhesion to recognize it and there in lies the flaw with
> marketing it to the general public. In this forum however, I would have to
> assume that that is what we would treasure as much as anything else.) What
> it isn't, is racing software. All "sims" should be racing software, at
least
> since GPL came out. It's unfortunate that more titles aren't up to date in
> multiplay.

> Confusing the abilities of any title is unfair to those who come here for
> information. In the case of GPx it's outright bigotry. There are so many
> things that I want to explore with GP4 but am afraid to post here. I fear
> asking a simple question and getting 40 replies that all but answer the
> question. I fear the prejudice and close minded conformity that will
> disallow even the good natured response from providing any real substance.

> ...and it's all because of ***s like you that have nothing
constructive
> to add and, apparently, a whole bunch of spare time.

> ...maybe you should get a hobby...

> ...like driving a sim or something. At least then your posts would be on
> topic and substantive.

> --

> "Nothing gets closer!" - Crammond

> mark




> > > The UI is atrocious. It's as if Crammond wants GP4 to fail. (Maybe he
> > does.)
> > > But, if you can manage to get all the helps turned off, the controller
> set
> > > up, the graphics at a sensible PO and FF turned off, you will be
treated
> > to
> > > the finest *driving* simulator offered for PC. The *** is, with the
> > > attitude that 95% of the people here have, you will never actually
> > > experience GP4.

> > > ....as 95% of the people here have not, as is obvious from the
> inaccuracy
> > of
> > > 95% of the posts about GP4.

> > Sorry, that doesn't convince me at all.  GP4, or any title in the
history
> of
> > *** that will continue to bare all the idiosyncrasies of a Geoff
> Crammond
> > game engine is and WILL fail to be considered by the simracing community
> as
> > a serious racing simulator.

> > Even if it hides some little hint of gem, it's still mixed up with a ton
> of
> > turd.

> > --
> > -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> > -- http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> > -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
> > Corporation - helping America into the New World...

Damien Smit

GP4 Mini-Review

by Damien Smit » Sun, 15 Sep 2002 19:01:47

Mark,

The reason that most people in this group have a dislike for GP4 mainly
comes down to physics.  Being a simulation group, obviously means that
physics is the number one priority for most of us.  Unfortunately, Geoff
Crammond is quite ignorant of car behaviour (he's not the only one.)  Sure,
there's some nice things in GP4 like the beautiful track scenary and the wet
weather effects.  But the physics are primitive.  Want an example?  Try
turning all aids off, then, while cornering, try ***ly lifting your foot
off the throttle.  Heck, you can even ***ly pump the throttle with no
(realistic) consequences.  Try doing that in F1 2002 or better still - a
real (powerful) car.

I found it strange that you mentioned the tyre model in GP4.  This is yet
another category where F1 2002 simply walks all over it.....???

FWIW - The following have a reputation for good physics :-  Nascar 2002,
GPL, Live For Speed, F1 2002

You also mentioned prejudice in this group, and in the case of ymenard, your
comments are probably justified!  FYI there's also a few yanks who don't
have much time for modern F1 in general like Gerry Aitken, Doug Ellison & Co
so their comments should bew taken with a grain of salt, though they're
usually pretty honest. ; )

Feel free to ask questions about GP4.  I *have* spent some time with it.
(It's just that in that time I found a few too many shortcomings)

Cheers
Damien

Ian

GP4 Mini-Review

by Ian » Sun, 15 Sep 2002 19:52:09

I think you'll find that Gerry and Doug are not "yanks" but British.

--

Ian P
<email invalid due to spam>


Ian Bel

GP4 Mini-Review

by Ian Bel » Sun, 15 Sep 2002 20:15:46

Nice post where you laud the tire model... the tire model that take NO
account whatsoever of Camber, Pressure and temperature... hmm, yes I see...
Excellent tire model.


> You are exactly the attitude I am talking about. I'm willing to bet you've
> never even driven GP4.

> In this group we get a lot of posts from guys like you, in the manner in
> which you post. A whole lot of "shirt", not so much "stuffing". You're
> statement on it's own indicates that you would never touch a Crammond
game.
> It also indicates that, had you, you would slander it regardless of you
real
> opinion. After all, you do have a reputation to keep up here, and changing
> your mind about something on r.a.s. would be to commit credible suicide.

> The problem, as I see it, is not your opinion of GP4 because you are well
> entitled to it whatever your reasons. The problem is in the fact that you
> answered my post. Reading through the GP4 posts on r.a.s., one comes away
> with the distinct impression that it is the single worst driving and
racing
> simulator that has ever been produced. Nothing could be further from the
> truth. Also, the fact that you cite "the simracing community" as the
> authority in your post (another thing that leads me to believe you have
> never driven GP4, not having an opinion of your own) is a cheap trick.
> Unfortunately, it becomes more effective every time it is uttered. If the
> "simracing community" that will follow you and those like you, rather than
> think on their own, could have the clarity of mind to make their own
> decisions - an approach without bias and preconception - many of them
would
> side against "the simracing community". No so much for the need to take a
> side, mind you. But rather to simply choose what they perceive to suit
their
> individual needs more satisfactorily.

> That being said, GP4 is an excellent racing simulator. As good as anything
> else available anyway. It is a superior driving simulator because of the
> tire model alone. (Although you would have to have had some experience at
> the limit of adhesion to recognize it and there in lies the flaw with
> marketing it to the general public. In this forum however, I would have to
> assume that that is what we would treasure as much as anything else.) What
> it isn't, is racing software. All "sims" should be racing software, at
least
> since GPL came out. It's unfortunate that more titles aren't up to date in
> multiplay.

> Confusing the abilities of any title is unfair to those who come here for
> information. In the case of GPx it's outright bigotry. There are so many
> things that I want to explore with GP4 but am afraid to post here. I fear
> asking a simple question and getting 40 replies that all but answer the
> question. I fear the prejudice and close minded conformity that will
> disallow even the good natured response from providing any real substance.

> ...and it's all because of ***s like you that have nothing
constructive
> to add and, apparently, a whole bunch of spare time.

> ...maybe you should get a hobby...

> ...like driving a sim or something. At least then your posts would be on
> topic and substantive.

> --

> "Nothing gets closer!" - Crammond

> mark




> > > The UI is atrocious. It's as if Crammond wants GP4 to fail. (Maybe he
> > does.)
> > > But, if you can manage to get all the helps turned off, the controller
> set
> > > up, the graphics at a sensible PO and FF turned off, you will be
treated
> > to
> > > the finest *driving* simulator offered for PC. The *** is, with the
> > > attitude that 95% of the people here have, you will never actually
> > > experience GP4.

> > > ....as 95% of the people here have not, as is obvious from the
> inaccuracy
> > of
> > > 95% of the posts about GP4.

> > Sorry, that doesn't convince me at all.  GP4, or any title in the
history
> of
> > *** that will continue to bare all the idiosyncrasies of a Geoff
> Crammond
> > game engine is and WILL fail to be considered by the simracing community
> as
> > a serious racing simulator.

> > Even if it hides some little hint of gem, it's still mixed up with a ton
> of
> > turd.

> > --
> > -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> > -- http://www.racesimcentral.net/
> > -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
> > Corporation - helping America into the New World...

Ian Bel

GP4 Mini-Review

by Ian Bel » Sun, 15 Sep 2002 20:19:20

I get the distinct impression that the GP4 engine is a retrograde step from
GP3 2000.  I have information from a well placed chap who says that the
physics engine was 'pruned' to allow the game to run properly on an XBox
with the very detailed tracks (and if you check the mesh, you'll find that
they are severely unoptimised, with high poly counts in places you could
never see). Then of course, the engine is shared on XBox and PC.

Ian
www.simbin.com


> The trouble is everyone has tried to tell him to burn the barn down
> (including all the turds) and build a new Barn. (a new physics engine).
> But he just continues trying to reorganise the turds in the old Barn, and
> keeps painting the outside to make it look pretty.
> How many of you guys have heard the Wiggles say
>  " WAKE UP GEOFF "  ?




> > Even if it hides some little hint of gem, it's still mixed up with a ton
> of
> > turd.

ymenar

GP4 Mini-Review

by ymenar » Mon, 16 Sep 2002 06:45:41


> You are exactly the attitude I am talking about. I'm willing to bet you've
> never even driven GP4.

Bwahahaha nice try.  Just this line above completely refutes your entire
troll post, as it's the basis of your post and it's completely untrue.

<snip>

Again, you only indicate stuff about "us", you are unable to prove anything
that would lead me into thinking that GP4 is even relatively good.  Like I
wrote, it has a couple of gems hidden under a ton of turd.

I'll ***ing reply to whatever post that I want.

No, it's the most shameful release ever, just after GP3.  It will surpassed
probably by yet-another-Geoff Crammond release that features his 15 years
old game engine.

No it's not.  It could have had been one if it was released a long time ago
(that's why nobody really puts down Gp2), but in modern *** it's anything
but excellent.  A true shame with all it's idiosyncrasies.

maybe you should shut the *** up?

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- http://www.racesimcentral.net/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...

ymenar

GP4 Mini-Review

by ymenar » Mon, 16 Sep 2002 06:47:45


> 1. IMHO GP4 still has the same feel as GP3 and 2.
>     The Car seems to Handle like it is on rails, then suddenly it is gone.
>     ( This is very reminiscent of F1RS )

Exactly.  Strip down GP4 of all it's gimmicks, new features and graphical
update and what do you have? F1GP or GP2.

Which is directly related to it's dropping frames versus stretching time
weird reality, something that flaws all Crammond's games.

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- http://www.ymenard.8m.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...

ymenar

GP4 Mini-Review

by ymenar » Mon, 16 Sep 2002 06:49:59


> It is a superior driving simulator because of the
> tire model alone.

Oh yeah Mark, where are the tyre temp reading in GP4???

Again, another idiosyncrasy that flaws a Crammond game.

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- http://www.ymenard.8m.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.